News

White & Case defects from University of Law to BPP

By on
13

New Yorkers’ London office cuts GDL and LPC deal with ULaw’s arch-rival

Lead

White & Case’s London office is to switch its training contract deal from the University of Law to BPP in a move that will do little to settle nerves at Europe’s biggest law school after it was sold in June for the second time in three years.

The New Yorkers generally take on about 30 trainee solicitors a year in the UK capital. Moving the deal for providing those trainees with the Graduate Diploma in Law and the Legal Practice Course will be a blow to ULaw, which has weathered a series of law firm defections to its arch-rival over the last year. Among those to have switched their business are Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance; Linklaters has, however, remained loyal to ULaw.

Neither of the universities nor White & Case would comment after a report of the news appeared on Myspace-style law firm partners’ chat room Roll on Friday. But a source close to the deal confirmed yesterday afternoon to Legal Cheek that the firm had indeed switched its affections to BPP.

Details of the move leaked out on the heels of an even bigger shake-up to the legal education market as Kaplan Law School confirmed that it was throwing in the towel after eight years in London.

The demise of its GDL and LPC offerings will leave the two big players scrambling for the law firm refugees. Kaplan had deals that covered trainees from nine City law firms and organisations: Bates Wells Braithwaite, Fieldfisher, Holman Fenwick Willan, Ince & Co, Penningtons Manches, the London office of Mayer Brown, Mills & Reeve, Nabarro and PwC Legal.

Earlier this summer ULaw pinched arguably the jewel in Kaplan’s training deal crown, its agreement with top US firm Shearman & Sterling. Will it beat BPP to the rest of the stricken law school’s bounty? Watch this space…

13 Comments

Lol

Just laughing at “Myspace-style law firm partners’ chat room” description of RoF.

One day somebody should collect all the different ways LegalCheek describes RoF because I never see the same one twice

(22)(0)

Plagiarism Cheek

That’s the spirit Alex, talk down RoF all you want. Everyone knows this is the second story in two days you lot snatched straight from that website. Unfunny bunch of flogs.

(15)(1)

Legal Beak

You ok hun?

(0)(5)

Cockpit

Hi Alex/Jonathan, how nice of you to drop by.

(3)(0)

Do some research Legal Cheek ...

My ass is Sherman a ‘Top U.S. Firm.’ I’m sure Skadden and Sullivan and Cromwell are shaking in their boots at the thought of the mighty Shermans…..

(3)(5)

SullCrom Swagg

They’re not a bad shop, but I agree that to claim they are a ‘top law firm’ and place them next to the likes of Wachtell, Simpson Thatcher or SullCrom is laughable.

Seems to me like this kind of puffery is quite commonplace at LC… Last week one of their hacks claimed CC was ‘aristocracy’ – that made me guffaw heartily.

(2)(4)

aristocrat

I agree legalcheek is often sloppy.

Well I guess but CC is at least top tier MC unlike Sherman.

Although it is considered less ‘establishment’ than the other members. Freshfields are 250 years older and have the whole Solicitor to the Bank of England connection in their favour. Compared to Freshies et al (Links, S&M) then yes CC isn’t as aristocratic. Top tier firm though.

(5)(2)

Anonymous

You are fast becoming the most annoying LC poster. Since when did ‘top’ become synonymous with ‘super elite’?

(2)(3)

Anonymous

Not getting your point?

(1)(0)

SullCrom Swagg

Diddums.

(0)(4)

Anonymous

I wasn’t criticising your comment. I was largely agreeing. Re-read. Also Wachtell while top, wouldn’t be considered ‘aristocratic’ either. Like Skadden it’s a new firm.

(1)(0)

Anonymous

I mean, you can’t even spell the firm’s name

(1)(0)

Anonymous

I feel bad for MySpace for that comparison.

(8)(0)

Comments are closed.