Linklaters’ latest partner promotion round features a notable lack of women

By on

Global titan falls short of its gender diversity target


Commercial super power Linklaters has set tongues wagging in legal London this week, following a partner promotion announcement that features relatively few women.

The magic circle firm — which alongside Slaughter and May has the highest proportion of women partners in the magic circle at 24% — revealed today that, worldwide, it has promoted a total of 24 lawyers to its top ranks, including 10 in its London HQ.

New London partners include University of Leeds grad Mark Drury, corporate lawyer Will Aitken-Davies, former Nabarro associate Philip Goss, and Oxford-educated Ian Hunter. The other partner promotions went to former Melbourne-based lawyer Oliver Sceales, real estate specialist Tom Watkins, ex-Linklaters counsel Georgina Kon, capital markets lawyer Alexander Shopov, University of Edinburgh graduate Neil Dixon and dispute resolution expert Ros Gallagher.

Certainly a mixed bag in terms of legal know-how, but on the diversity front the lack of women sticks out like a sore thumb. All but two of these London-based newbie partners are male, meaning that only 20% of the new cohort are female.

Internationally, the numbers are better — slightly. If we add the firm’s Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Paris, New York, Munich, Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Stockholm offices into the mix, then we’re looking at a figure of 20.8%.

The figures make for surprising reading given the firm’s commitment to gender diversity. And while Linklaters’ associates are predominantly female (51%), there is a distinct lack of women in the top ranks — as is also the case in most City firms. The commercial powerhouse has set a target of 30% female partners by 2018 in an effort to combat this. Currently it’s still some way off at just 24%.

In terms of its heavily male-dominated partnership promotion round, then, Linklaters looks to be following in the footsteps of commercial rival Macfarlanes. We’re hoping this isn’t going to become part of an ongoing trend — and so, it seems, is Linklaters. A spokesperson said:

We have made clear that improving diversity at the firm is a key global priority and our track record over recent years is showing encouraging improvement.

They continued:

While we would have clearly preferred a better gender balance in this year’s cohort, we will judge the success of our many gender focused initiatives over a longer time span than individual years and with a sense of a healthy male and female ‘future partner pipeline” we are confident that the direction we are heading will continue to yield improvement and allow us to meet our ambitious targets.

It had, in fact, been a pretty good start to the month in terms of gender diversity news. Pinsent Masons promoted eight women to its top ranks, Allen & Overy was applauded for making marked progress in its strive towards its gender diversity target, and Linklaters made headlines for considering a woman for the important role of senior partner.



‘set tongues wagging’? What, among you and Charlotte Proudman?



That is an image for you us to savour.



*and us



Sorry, but this is continual stream of stories along these lines is not only boring but somewhat insulting to those promoted. To make partner in a City firm is very tough, you can be sure that those who made it have earned it worked hard on gaining clients and impressing partners above them. Their gender is irrelevant. To say that their promotion is “disappointing” or similar really is a kick in the teeth.

Why not drop this non-stop hand wringing and instead put efforts into more positive articles.



To be honest I doubt the Linklaters partners neither know or care about legalcheek to be affected by what it says. Making partner at Links is one of the biggest achievements in city law.



For fuck sake, stop posting the same shit all the time.



You don’t see diversity in the promotions? Well I see it. Lots of non-Oxbridge, upper-society lawyers being promoted here.

If you want a 50-50 parity of female lawyer promotions then I shall demand for at least 1 asexual space-alien transvestite attack helicopter lawyer to be promoted every year, because such people/things/beings exist in society and must be represented in law firms.



How many women applied for partnership? How many men? Of those applicants, how many were good enough that they could reasonably have been promoted?

What if only two women applied but 88 men did? The data would show an unfair 100% success rate for female applicants verses a measly 25% for male! (Do you see my point?)

I’m not saying this is the case, but if you’re going to write these boring articles every week, at least provide enough data to support the insinuations contained in them. Reading articles complaining that there isn’t a perfect 50/50 split in everything is getting tedious.



I believe diversity was an old old wooden ship used during the civil war era



This is getting really boring. If I wanted to spend my free time reading childish articles about diversity statistics with inane social commentary I would not be on this website, and I suspect I’m far from alone.



You’d be on The Grauniad



Is this not a copy paste of the Macfarlanes article last week? Is KK a broken record broken record broken record?


Comments are closed.