News

The Law Society has just wasted £7 million on a failed business venture — here is what they could have spent it on

By on
9

Independent review reveals a catalogue of errors led to conveyance software flop

lead1

An independent review into a Law Society-backed business venture that left solicitors £7 million out of pocket has unveiled a series of failures.

In a joint venture with Indian-based global IT firm Mastek, the Law Society big-wigs attempted to revolutionise the glamorous word of conveyance law by establishing an online portal called Veyo.

Paying £600,000 for a 60% stake in Veyo back in 2014, and a further £2,668,000 to Mastek over the same year, the Law Society invested heavily in the development of the new software technology. However, citing a “radically” changing market — just one year on — society management pulled the plug. And all the senior staff who worked at the newly formed Legal Practice Technologies (LPT) and the Law Society on Veyo are no longer employed.

With reports suggesting the failed venture cost reached an eye-watering £7 million, an independent review into what went wrong has revealed a catalogue of embarrassing errors. Speaking to website Legal Futures the society’s chief executive, Catherine Dixon, revealed an overly complex management structure led to poor communication.

Furthermore, staff not only lacked certain expertise but there was insufficient input from expert conveyancers. Dixon — who said she was “deeply sorry” for the failure of Veyo — confirmed that a full version of the review would not be made available to the public.

This is second time that attempts to create an industry-wide online conveyancing system have hit the buffers. In 2011, Land Registry discontinued a similar scheme because of escalating costs and security concerns.

With solicitors left to guess the finer details of what one can only imagine is a very damning report, here are some ideas from Legal Cheek as to how the Law Society might have more profitably spent the £7 million.

1. Caffeine

lead1

2. Alcohol

lead1

3. Graduate Diploma in Law

lead1

4. Legal Practice Course

LPC

5. Trainee Lawyers

lead1

6. Property

Rightmove
Rightmove

Got a better suggestion? Be sure to post it below.

9 Comments

Anonymous

17 Law Society CEOs?

(9)(0)

Anonymous

The Law Society is just like a union – a mostly useless bureaucratic monster which bangs the table occasionally for its members’ rights because its members can no longer keep up with those union payments.

(1)(0)

Lee Travers

I think we should ban doors that can only be pushed or pulled and make it so all the doors are swinging doors. Its well annoying (and embarrassing!!) when you push a door you can only pull. Or we should make it so all doors can only be pushed/or only pulled, so nobody makes that mistake ever again!!!

(10)(1)

Anonymous

Some proper journalists for LC?

(18)(6)

Anonymous

Burn…

(2)(0)

Anonymous

This post has been removed because it breaches Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(10)(1)

Anonymous

Whilst the headline article is spelt correctly, you may wish to check the web address for this piece: ‘could of spent it on’ – could of or COULD HAVE??? ugh

(1)(1)

Lord Hotpants of Dover

I “would of” spent it on some of the high class hookers that frequent Wetherspoons near chancery lane… innit..

(1)(0)

Anonymous

It was more like 11 million not 7

(1)(0)

Comments are closed.