Cambridge law student who burned £20 note in front of homeless man KEEPS university place

Ronald Coyne reveals he’s been threatened with chemical attacks in apology letter to peers

A University of Cambridge law student who sparked outrage after attempting to burn a £20 note in front of a homeless man will not be expelled.

The prestigious university came under pressure to remove Ronald Coyne after Snapchat footage of him goading a homeless man while dressed in white tie went viral in February (screenshots below).

But Coyne has kept his place at Cambridge’s Pembroke College after penning an apology letter (in full below), admitting he had abused his “privilege”.

Circulated by email to his college peers, Coyne — who was a fresher at the time and claims to have received threats of “violence” and “chemical attacks” following the incident — continued:

I made a terrible mistake, and I quite rightly faced disciplinary action for it. I have addressed the root causes of my behaviour by attending awareness classes, relating to both alcohol and social inclusion.

The decision comes despite a petition calling for Coyne’s removal, which garnered over 23,000 signatures.

A spokesperson for Pembroke College told Legal Cheek: “Disciplinary action has been taken, but of course the college cannot comment on the outcome of individual disciplinary cases. However, we recognise that this incident has resulted in understandable concern.”

Stressing that the college places “great value” on how it treats others, the spokesperson continued:

Following the incident, Pembroke students raised more than £1,000 by for the local rough-sleeper community, and across Cambridge there has been a significant rise in student volunteering with rough-sleeper charities locally.

The note burning, which we discussed at length during a live Facebook stream, divided readers’ opinions at the time.

One suggested that Coyne — who was promptly dismissed from the Cambridge University Conservative Association (CUCA) — was just a “young guy who did a silly thing”, while another reader commented: “his actions are those of a sociopath.” Another, perhaps rightly, said: “bye bye training contract.”

Read Ronald Coyne’s letter in full:

Dear all,

As you may recall, earlier this year it was widely reported in the media that I attempted to set alight to a £20 note on Bridge Street in Cambridge. Until now, there had been an ongoing disciplinary process on a University and college level which had meant I couldn’t respond publicly. Now that these processes have concluded, I am setting out to try to remedy some of the hurt caused by my actions. As one of those steps, I want to take the opportunity to apologise.

My actions were wrong and without thought or consideration. I abused my privilege as a student at such a great university, and behaved in a way which is totally contrary to the values of the university and of its students. I acknowledge that my behaviour put the entire university in a negative light, and for that I am sorry. For the effect that my behaviour had on you as a community, I am also sorry.

I am extremely fortunate to have a place at Cambridge. My experience of Cambridge was of a place which is positive, accepting, and friendly. Yet on that evening, I forgot what it really meant to study at Cambridge. I misrepresented what it meant to be a student here. The gift of a great education should be a tool to enrich society, not an excuse to debase it. I made a terrible mistake, and I quite rightly faced disciplinary action for it. I have addressed the root causes of my behaviour by attending awareness classes, relating to both alcohol and social inclusion.

I am truly sorry for the upset I have caused my fellow students. I cannot begin to express my heartfelt remorse for the guilt by association you all faced, on many levels. When the media commentary flared up, strangers sent piles of abusive mail to my family home threatening me with violence, and chemical attacks. I received some sympathetic letters and emails from people who thought that the online abuse went too far. To those people, I am still grateful. I would like to end by repeating my deep regret at the offence and hurt caused by my actions, and asking for a second chance.

Ronald Coyne.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

120 Comments

Coco the Killer Clown

The Clowns are coming for you tonight, wee Master Coyne!

The University wouldn’t do the right thing because you’re one of them and wrote a sweet little letter.

Better pack your extra thick pampers!!!!!

(14)(2)
Reply Report comment
Coco the Killer Clown

Where’s the boy about apologising to the homeless man?

Missing?

Consequences forthcoming!!!!

🤡🤡🤡🤣🤡🤡🤣🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣

(32)(2)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Who are you to prescribe consequences for this man?

The beggar shouldn’t have been begging. He was committing an offence under the Vagrancy Act.

(1)(6)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

He”s only apologised to save his own skin. I hope he never sets foot in a law firm unless he’s in need of their services.

Foul human being.

(37)(4)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Why did the Tories expel him? This is exactly what you would expect of BoJo et all at Uni. Future Party Leader?? Interesting that he didn’t cross the road to taunt the homeless guy. Coward. If it was me he did it to, I would have crossed the road and taught him a lesson he would have remembered for a very long time.

(9)(2)
Reply Report comment
Sughers III

A very, very stupid one. But I don’t suppose any of the people slating him on this page have ever made a similarly big mistake, in any aspect of their lives. I’m sure they too would wish for forgiveness and a second chance, however, had they ever made such a mistake… Ask the homeless guy whether he forgives him, I suspect you might be surprised at his answer. No doubt, some of the people braying for this young man’s blood are consciously or otherwise envious of him, which may colour their response to his unfortunate indiscretion.

Yours faithfully,

Ronaldo Coin

(2)(2)
Reply Report comment
Interloper

Wasn’t a mistake thought was it ! Was in actuality an action he subsequently regretted, made whilst he was pissed (and therefore less inhibited). Probably had a right old larf (braying guffaw ?) about it at the time..

Speaks massive volumes for the sort of person he is. I don’t think what he did was in any way defensible and the manner of his apology is equally nausea-inducing. I would suggest he tries sleeping on the streets to get a taste of what life is like for people that have no other choice but there’s probably little point as his cosseted upbringing will have arrested any nascent instinct for empathy at an early stage of his “development”…ffa

(2)(1)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

what would you call it then ? an action that should ruin his academic career, ruin everything he has worked for, diminish his intellect and professional capacity because he is a mean twat ? honestly people, you should calm the fuck down a bit, no one is arguing him being as absolute idiot and a mean person by doing this… but are you better? the ones, who are threatening him with so called consequences ? are YOU a better person, a kinder one ? nope.

and after all, let’s all think about the fucked up and mean things we’ve done in our lives when drunk/young/stupid, yeah ? i bet you’d get the same threats if that was put on the internet.

or am i wrong ?

(4)(2)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

People like that shouldn’t be forgiven – he clearly has a fundamental behavioural problem and he obviously looks down on others. The cunt should be stripped of his privileges.

(26)(11)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

More likely it will all be forgotten by the time he graduates and he can proceed to get the positive reinforcement/normalisation for such behaviour with a TC, along with likeminded “young bucks”, at some arishole MC outfit like Anal & Ovaries..

(3)(1)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

He should consider a career with the DWP as a government lawyer.

They specialise in snatching money away from sick and disabled people while laughing and snarling.

(35)(10)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Anonymous, you would never make it through even the first stage of the Government Legal Service recruitment programme. DWP lawyers are civil servants who advise Ministers and draft legislation on the instructions they receive. If you dislike the outcome, vote for a different party, don’t shoot the messenger.

(13)(7)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Most peope on here would never make it past any TC process with their extremely warped views on the profession and unrealistic snobery and arrogance

(8)(2)
Reply Report comment
Former government lawyer

Actually, they don’t, that’s the politicians’ job. if you think a government lawyer or civil servant can refuse to take instructions to do something , because of a moral objection to a Government policy, you are naïve. They are bound by the ethical code which applies to all civil servants, and lawyers by the Code of Ethics adopted by their regulator. Anything beyond this is a matter of conscience. I guess if a lawyer feels strongly enough about an issue in which he or she receives instructions, they can always choose to resign. Then again, they probably wouldn’t have become a government lawyer in the first place if they take this course.
At present there are some 2000+ UK government lawyers providing advice, drafting legislation and providing litigation services to Whitehall. They come from across the political spectrum and they do their jobs by putting personal opinions aside, acting impartially and to the best of their professional ability. They can no more refuse to act on proper instructions than can a lawyer in private practice who disagrees with his client’s values and ethics.

(9)(2)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Don’t bother explaining things on this website mate, it’s chock-full of two-bit pinheads suffering from delusions of grandeur.

(13)(3)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Except they don’t act impartially, but like vicious Tories. Endless spurious speculative appeals and contemptuous language towards vulnerable and disabled people.

“I was only following orders.”

(3)(6)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

I don’t think he was commenting on the difficulty of getting or performing a DWP job, more that callousness is a positive attribute for it.

(3)(2)
Reply Report comment
🤡

🎼He’s Ronald McDonald… the hamburger-happy clown… the McDonald’s drive-in restaurant is his favourite place in town🎶

Copyright 1966.

(0)(0)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

He’s suffered enough and done his time. He will have learned a valuable life lesson. Let him get on with his life. He’s unlikely ever to practice law in any form.

(19)(34)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

His letter only expresses remorse at how his actions have damaged the spirit of the university and the impact it has had on his fellow students. He does not express genuine remorse for his actions towards the homeless guy. He isn’t sorry for what he did, he is only sorry he got caught.

(62)(0)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Boozed up, undoubtedly encouraged, peer pressure, trying to fit in. Hopefully he learns from it and gives something back.

Eternal condemnation is path to pursue my fellow cheekers.

(11)(8)
Reply Report comment
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Mercy comes to those who repent.

He still hasn’t acknowledged that what he did was cruel to the disabled man.

He’s only sorry for bringing his university into disrepute.

No contrition = no mercy.

(13)(1)
Reply Report comment
Sir Geffroy De Joinville

His troth is lost and he should do the decent thing.
Sous le code de la chevalerie, il doit indemniser sa victime.
Did he pay the homeless person a hovel and a years sack of porridge?

(2)(1)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

It is fantastic that his apology is only for attempting to set alight a £20 note on Bridge Street. If he had put that limited apology before me I would have dismissed him.
He is fortunate that Cambridge ‘s standards are so low. Given the importance of Cambridge University to the social fabric, their low threshold is our loss.
I wonder how long he pondered over his incomplete factual admission in his opening paragraph thinking “I can probably get away with saying that and no more”.

(12)(3)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Agreed. These sanctimonious ghouls only revel in his disgrace because he’s from a privileged background. They’d behave the same way if they saw him volunteering in a soup kitchen.

(5)(4)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

He has a very punchable face.

That letter clearly shows no actual remorse. All it does is reinforce that all he really cares about is reputation and status.

(13)(3)
Reply Report comment
A Superior Brand of Clown

His arrogance and superiority is written all over his face in that picture.

I think his face would make a great mask.

Perhaps in the sense of Hannibal Lecter’s police-officer mask…?

(7)(1)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

It’s because they do it in that shithouse film based on that shithouse club that Cams and Bozza belonged to in Oxford.

And guess what Coyne ? It ain’t funny and you’re a sad twat.

It would have been funny if Cambridge threw him out for this. Might have made a point about such behaviour being unacceptable. Since they didn’t, one can infer that it is ipso facto acceptable in their eyes. So they’re also twats.

(4)(2)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Nowhere in that PR-written letter is there an apology for his actions. There is not even a mention of the gentleman he humiliated. There are only apologies for causing a bit of an upset to the university.

“I made a terrible mistake, and I quite rightly faced disciplinary action for it. I have addressed the root causes of my behaviour by attending awareness classes, relating to both alcohol and social inclusion.”

It wasn’t a mistake. It was a choice.
If he didn’t have the brain cells to be “aware” that humiliating a homeless man in this way was vile behaviour, he surely doesn’t have the brain cells to be at Pembroke.

Pembroke should have kicked him out.

(12)(2)
Reply Report comment
Sir Ponsonby Smythe-Smallpiece

I cannot recommend Cambridge University’s Social Inclusion Classes enough.

Before I went to them, I always assumed that the homeless peasant was secretly laughing along at the joke, and was therefore in on the banter.

I had no idea that in fact it was deeply distressing and humiliating to the tramp concerned.

It isn’t Mr Coyne’s fault that he didn’t grow up on a council estate.

(13)(0)
Reply Report comment
Coco the Killer Clown

Hurry home, Ronnie!

The clock is ticking!

It’s almost time!

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡💡😁💡😁💡💡😁🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣😁🤣🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡😁😁

(4)(3)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

His apology summarized: I’m sorry to the university. I’m sorry to fellow students. People have been really mean to me.
Also, is it just me, or does he have one of the world’s most punchable faces?

(10)(0)
Reply Report comment
Regretful DWF Trainee

Give the guy a break, we’ve all done worse. I accepted a TC from DWF so we all know whose position we would prefer to be in.

(2)(2)
Reply Report comment
BBC News

NEWS JUST IN:

Ronnie’ testicles have just been found next to a blood-stained clown mask and a rusty bread-knife outside Pembroke College.

(3)(1)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

It seems someone can no longer make restitution in any way that will satisfy everyone, if they ever could. Maybe if you were less unhappy with your own lives you wouldn’t care so much than a young man made a foul error of judgement. Maybe you’d pick up on the harassment he’s received as being disgusting in itself.

(3)(7)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Eh? Maybe if you were less unhappy with your own life you wouldn’t care so much that people do not accept the disgusting behaviour of this idiot and his artificial apology to those whose cooperation he requires to further his own career, and his total absence of apology to the gentleman who he humiliated.

See? The Daily Mail”if you were less unhappy with your own life” mantra could just go on and on and on..

(3)(3)
Reply Report comment
Alexandr

I’m perfectly happy with my life.

I’m not perfectly happy with this sort of utterly foul behaviour from a privileged nut job.

Simples!

(5)(0)
Reply Report comment
Sir Geffroy De Joinville

Hear Hear Sir Ponsonby , the ungrateful serf should have been delighted with the warmth provided by the burning £20 note.

(3)(1)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

The man has apologised. He’ll likely have difficulty with applications post-university.

So now, you can all get over it. Don’t pretend this is about anything other than prejudice against wealth and privilege.

(3)(12)
Reply Report comment
Anonymous

Show us where he has apologised to the gentleman he humiliated and taunted. Not the grovelling to the people he needs for his studies and career, but the actual apology to the homeless gentleman.

(10)(0)
Reply Report comment
Proelia

False contrition. He is devoid of empathy which is exhibited by his behaviour to begin with and the failure to show genuine remorse and to apologise to the homeless man. All he has done is engage in a pity play through the content of that letter which is a device to manage the facade. He has no insight at all into his behaviour as he is a clear narcissist. He just has sufficient cognitive function to create an appearance of remorse, but really, there is none.
Expect similar behaviour in the future but it will always be somebody or something else’s fault, never his.

(5)(0)
Reply Report comment
Ronald "Sackcloth and Ashes" Coyne

I would like to extend an invitation to all persons whose fathers earn in excess of £100K per annum to my pity party, this evening at Pembroke College, 9pm til late.

Dress code: no clown outfits.

(7)(0)
Reply Report comment
Uncle Brother

Most homeless people end up so as a result of addiction. The only way to get addicted is to be born rich, with substantial disposable income and no job. Indeed, many inheritors purposely make themselves disabled through their addiction so as to take advantage of a lower tax rate on their trust fund.

Many people from working class backgrounds work hard at school to get into a top university, seeing that as their best root out of poverty.

It is likely that this over-privileged addict taunted and even physically assaulted (this is common behaviour among addicts)the hard working student on a daily basis, until the latter snapped. I would hope the homeless addict is investigated fully, and possibly prosecuted the relevant public order, hate crime, and sexual offence legislation

(2)(6)
Reply Report comment
Old Pembrokian

I have been following this saga with interest.

I attended Pembroke College in the 1970s, and I can tell you that nothing like this would have happened then.

The wealthy students would occasionally try to outdo each other by making ridiculously large donations to homeless people in an effort to show off.

I fear that the cruel money-burning ritual must have been a product of the excesses of the 1980s and later.

I had considered making a six-figure donation to my old college upon retirement from a successful career, but seeing how they have decided not to rusticate this unfortunate specimen, thereby minimising his behaviour, I shall not be doing so.

(4)(2)
Reply Report comment
Uncle Brother

Nonsense, the 80s were characterised by a healthy money motivation that would have scoffed at wasting a perfectly good £20 on an outcome (putting a violent addict in his place) that could have been achieved without any investment at all!

(1)(0)
Reply Report comment
charlottan

everyone makes silly mistakes …. in this case he thought his alcohol and peer – fuelled, and politically – inspired obnoxiousness was funny when its not….. “rustication” (such an old fashioned term, quaint) would be breaking a nut with sledgehammer…. this is like a storm in a tea cup….. it only matters to those (irrelevant) people who love to bash a Oxbridge sort (an impulse which comes from a place of insecurity)

do hope that Ronald coyne has done some soul – searching and learned a contradictory lesson in appropriate behaviour and how big and blown out of proportion some actions can become with the help of the media (social and otherwise)….

(0)(0)
Reply Report comment
Docs Ludvig Friedrich Von Lowenstein, Heinrich Litevsky, nurses Latvka Dablitz, Simka Oblenski and all the staff at the World (mental) Health Organisation.

Aha. We have another psychiatrist. Welkommen Proellia.
There is enough material here for an entire convention.
And we use the old fashioned term psychopath.

(0)(0)
Reply Report comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.