Fake Squire Patton Boggs website given court approval in bizarre decision

By on

A training contract at may differ somewhat to scheme at

Screenshot taken from

Chinese copyright chiefs have given the thumbs up to — a website that seems to be a blatant attempt to rip off the well known international law firm Squire Patton Boggs (which itself resides at

In a bizarre decision handed down by the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (ADNDRC), a panel of one managed to overlook the fact that Qinhuangdao Hongshun, the Chinese company which owns, has got nothing to do with Squire Patton Boggs, and backed its use of the domain.

Legal Cheek understands that Chinese copyright law isn’t big on common sense, and ruled in favour of Qinhuangdao Hongshun because it registered before Squire Patton Boggs filed its own trademark application in China.

A clue to Qinhuangdao Hongshun’s possible intentions lies in documents filed to the ADNDRC by Squire Patton Boggs, which state that it had asked the top law firm for $450,000 (£333,000) in exchange for the transfer of

Happily, Qinhuangdao Hongshun’s win seems set to be temporary. Squire Patton Boggs has released this statement on the matter:

The ADNDRC decision simply pushes the resolution of the domain dispute to a later time when the currently pending trademark invalidation proceedings will be concluded.

Readers fluent in Mandarin can read the decision on the ADNDRC’s website.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.



Fascinating news.



What a terrific pinch of RollOnFriday.

Smashing good work Alex, doing mumma proud!



It would seem this first appeared here So by your logic it was “pinched” from them. Don’t journalists report on news broken elsewhere all the time?



Hi Alex.



Articles misses the best part of the fake SPB website… the entire front page has FAQ’s about how to protect your IP in China….



I seem to recall that this sort of dispute was quite common in the early 90s when quick-thinking kids bought domain names for popular things and then got forced to hand them over to the companies concerned.

That said, I’ve heard that pupillage differs quite considerably between and too…



This has nothing to do with copyright. It’s a domain name dispute, linked to a trade mark dispute. I also doubt that the ADNDRC has the final say in this, because .net is a top level domain and not within its control. Ultimately WIPO can become involved:


The panelist Hong Xue SJD, professor at Beijing Normal University. plus other ip roles around the world


Comments are closed.