News

Don’t leave trainees in retention limbo, Law Society tells firms

By on
11

Rookies should know whether they’re hired or fired at least eight weeks before qualification

The Law Society of England and Wales has published fresh guidance urging law firms to avoid leaving trainees in retention limbo.

The Law Society’s Junior Lawyers Division (JLD) pushed for these recommendations over fears some employers fail to let their trainees know whether they will be offered a newly qualified (NQ) position “until the last moment”.

Expanding, the chair of the JLD, Adele Edwin-Lamerton, told Legal Cheek that trainees are often “left in limbo, with no NQ role and no clue when or if that may change, and unable to look elsewhere for fear of appearing disloyal”. She continued:

“In extreme cases trainees have been told there is no role for them the day before their training contract ends.”

Legal Cheek has been told by City lawyers that trainees interviewing for associate positions at other firms in the run-up to qualification season is far from unheard-of. This is done as a sort of back-up — time and effort trainees may feel is poorly spent if they do then get kept on.

To combat this, the guidance says that “as part of good practice” firms should inform rookies at least 12 weeks before qualification as to when they can expect a decision about retention. Then, the recommendations state, outfits should inform trainees of this decision no later than eight weeks prior to their expected admission date.

If a firm is unable to provide this information it should inform trainees of this along with reasons why. “This guidance will mean trainees know where they stand early enough to make plans for the future,” Edwin-Lamerton concludes.

The 2018 Firms Most List

While this guidance will hopefully give limbo-loving firms a polite nudge, not all outfits keep trainees hanging on.

In December, Legal Cheek reported that Mayer Brown had confirmed that all four of its trainees due to qualify in March (yes, you read that correctly) had already accepted associate roles at the firm. The year before, Slaughter and May posted its perfect 100% spring retention score before Christmas, too.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub

11 Comments

Anonymous

This is a two way street of course – I knew a girl on my intake who accepted an NQ position, but then a week before the TC ended announced that she was off to a rival firm (having never actually put pen to paper).

HR were livid (probably because they forgot to get her to sign), as was the partner of the snubbed department (and the other NQs who suddenly had 3 associates work between the 2 of them). Much better for all parties to get it agreed well in advance.

(11)(1)

Anonymous

Even when they do put pen to paper, there are rarely any repercussions for someone backing out of a future employment contract.

I have known trainees sit on multiple NQ offers and play the system to their advantage, resulting in others in their intake not being made offers where they reneged so late in the process. The suggested process wouldn’t resolve that issue.

(3)(0)

Anonymous

This information is great and all but good journalism and a good read would have stated some specific examples with trainee experiences at City firms.

(4)(0)

Anonymous

*cough* Norton Rose Fulbright

(8)(0)

Anonymous

*cough* Cms Cameron Mckenna Nabarro olswang…

(1)(1)

Anonymous

CMS = farce

(0)(0)

salivating dog

RELEASE DAS RETENTION FIGOOOORRRSSS

(0)(0)

Anonymous

The list would be so long that it would eclipse the article if you named all the firms that do this.

(8)(0)

Anonymous

I qualified a while ago and the firm didn’t even tell me I had a job, I just turned up the next day as a NQ and did the same job, I did the day before 🙁

(7)(0)

Anonymous

I’ve never signed anything or had my credentials checked in nearly 10 years.

I could be a complete fraud and no-one would know (I’m not and I have all my certificates in case anyone asks…)

(4)(0)

Anonymous

Mike Ross… Is that you?

(10)(0)

Comments are closed.

Related Stories