Skip to content

Trainee solicitor worked second job at Home Office and accessed visa files

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

12

12 month suspension

Piles of files
A trainee solicitor who took a second job at the Home Office and used his access to check visa files linked to clients, relatives and people he knew has been suspended from practice for 12 months.

Md Towhidul Islam was working at immigration firm Waterstone Legal when, in August 2019, he also started work as an executive officer litigation caseworker at the Home Office.

The second role gave Islam access to the Home Office’s Central Referencing System, which contains confidential information relating to UK visa applications. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal heard that he went on to access eight files which had not been allocated to him.

Two related to clients of Waterstone Legal, five concerned members of his family and another involved someone he knew personally. Most of the immigration matters had already concluded by the time Islam accessed them, and the SRA accepted that his actions had no direct impact on any live appeals.

The 2026 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

Islam also failed to tell the Home Office that he was continuing to work as a trainee solicitor while employed as a caseworker. Given the nature of the two jobs, the tribunal found that he should have recognised the potential for a conflict of interest and disclosed his position.

The tribunal heard that Islam had been warned when he joined the Home Office that access to its systems was restricted and that personal data had to be handled carefully.

There was no evidence that Islam passed any of the information he accessed to a third party or that he intended to cause harm. The tribunal nevertheless found that the risk of harm from accessing confidential immigration records without a proper reason should have been obvious.

It described Islam’s conduct as stemming from a “misplaced and inappropriate curiosity” about immigration matters with which he had a personal connection.

Islam admitted acting recklessly, lacking integrity and failing to behave in a way that maintained public trust in the profession. Allegations of dishonesty were withdrawn by the SRA as part of an agreed outcome.

In mitigation, Islam said the conduct took place during a particularly difficult period in his life, when he was balancing his studies, two jobs and family pressures connected with his wife’s pregnancy. He also stressed that he had not yet qualified as a solicitor at the time of the misconduct.

Islam resigned from the Home Office in November 2019 and qualified as a solicitor the following year. The tribunal heard that he had since reflected on what happened and that there had been no further disciplinary concerns.

The SDT suspended Islam for 12 months and imposed conditions on his practice for a further year. During that period, he will require SRA approval for certain employment and will be prevented from taking on roles including law firm owner, manager or compliance officer.

He was also ordered to pay £41,350 towards the SRA’s costs.

guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
SALTY GRAD
SALTY GRAD
17 days ago

£41,350 in costs?! What is this madness.

Anon
Anon
17 days ago

It’s gobsmacking to me that this gets a 12 month suspension, but Kieran gets struck off for a his bike insurance claim. Such a circus.

Bob
Bob
17 days ago
Reply to  Anon

A fraudulent bike insurance claim. Agreed though, this definitely warrants striking off.

Cashew
Cashew
17 days ago
Reply to  Anon

I’m thinking it might be due to the dishonesty charge being dropped.

Crying Paralegal
Crying Paralegal
17 days ago

The SRA is a fickle thing – here, the guy was working two jobs with a clear conflict of interest in his professional life… allowed to remain a solicitor following his suspension term.

In the other case of the lawyer working a side hustle on JustAnswer, he is struck off.

And the other solicitor who (admittedly yes) lied to his insurance (but curse Big Insurance), completely outside of his professional life, is also struck off.

The SRA chops and changes as they please!

Last edited 17 days ago by Crying Paralegal
Cashew
Cashew
17 days ago

The lawyer working with JustAnswer on the side was confronted by his employer with evidence including an invoice and failed to fess up. He also said the invoice was for work done by his brother as I recall reading last week. He compounded the issue.

Crying Paralegal
Crying Paralegal
17 days ago
Reply to  Cashew

I agree the JustAnswer guy definitely compounded the issue – my comment was intended to highlight how seemingly similar cases before the SRA can result in such varying sanctions! 🙂

Personally, I think that in this article’s case, knowingly accessing the confidential information should’ve amounted to dishonesty (there is no honest reason why he needed to access those documents, he knew this, destroying the confidential nature of the information etc) – and therefore should’ve either been a strike off as in the JustAnswer case, or otherwise if we are letting off the individual in this case, then you could argue that the JustAnswer man who was grindmaxxing should’ve also just been suspended. But hey that’s just my thoughts 😀

Anon
Anon
17 days ago

Woke racism against British people.

Woke2
Woke2
12 days ago
Reply to  Anon

JustAnswer lawyer – dishonesty
Bike insurance lawyer – fraud and dishonesty
Second job lawyer – double clicked on files of people he knew in his second job. No dishonesty, no harm.

What is woke?

Frightened Paralegal
Frightened Paralegal
16 days ago

Who wants to play Regulation Roulette?

Barmey
Barmey
17 days ago

Over £40,000 in costs – what an absolute joke.

It’s like the only two options open to the SDT are strike-off or extreme costs/fines on juniors. The SDT needs to fix up, ASAP.

blagoyewitch
blagoyewitch
16 days ago
Reply to  Barmey

TOPKEK

Related Stories

Junior solicitor struck off after asking colleague to hide file

Denied it when confronted by firm

Aug 10 2026 7:56am
2

Solicitor avoids strike off over antisemitic social media posts

Suspended suspension and restrictions on social media activity

May 26 2026 8:51am