Mixed reviews đ˝ď¸

From Michelin-quality meals to stale biscuits, Legal Cheekâs spies have seen it all. Exclusive data from our survey of over 2,000 trainees and junior associates reveals the low-down on law firm canteens and food. With one rookie describing food quality as “a factor when deciding whether to stay or leave”, itâs time to shine a spotlight on the unsung hero of corporate law: the food!
First up: the bad. âIf you want a daily dose of food poisoningâ, pipes up one newbie, their canteen âdoes the trick!â Another at the same firm adds that the food is âpretty inedible at timesâ (poor them!). A hungry source elsewhere is equally unimpressed:
âSometimes I wonder whether the London canteen chefs have ever actually tried the food theyâre serving.â
But spare a thought for those who donât even have these slim pickings! Asked to rate their firmâs canteen, one wit remarks: âIt isnât great largely because it doesnât existâ.
From the bad and non-existent, we move to the merely expensive. One junior complains that the food is âsuper expensive with small portions. When complaints are made, they respond with âweâre cheaper than Wagamamaâ.â Hard to argue with that! Another trainee has found a different solution, opting âfor Tesco meal deals insteadâ.
On a more positive note, even rookies unimpressed by the food have plenty of praise for those serving it. âFood abysmal, staff wonderfulâ, as one memorable quip puts it. Reports are peppered with praise for âamazing and friendlyâ baristas, âbrilliantâ kitchen staff and âan absolute gemâ of a pastry chef. One junior sums up the general feeling rather neatly: âAmazing staff. So kindâ.
There is, however, one minor caveat: the occasional culinary âexperimentationâ.
âThe catering team likes to get creative with certain dishes — which can be hit-or-missâ, says one rookie.
And finally, we arrive at the crème de la crème: the dizzying culinary heights of City law firms. One budding food critic at Winston Taylor claims that âthe canteen is the best part of the mergerâ. Meanwhile, a fellow foodie at another top firm reveals that âwe have a good cafĂŠ and a high standard restaurant (never call it a canteen, darling). The chefs are extremely talented and provide bespoke menus each week (although I do wish we offered dinner, too).â Restaurant it is!
But the two titans of the legal food world have to be Travers Smith and Paul, Weiss. Newbies at the former wax lyrical about Braithwaites, the âfamous in-house restaurantâ, hailing it as âexceptionalâ and âthe best in the city, easilyâ. Rookies here enjoy ârestaurant quality food available for breakfast, lunch and dinner — completely free of chargeâ.
But could Paul, Weiss be even better? One rookie certainly thinks so: âI would genuinely eat at Air [the in-house restaurant] rather than go out to anywhere in Soho. The dinner service is sublime”.
The knockout blow, however, comes from this particularly enthusiastic newbie, who describes Paul, Weissâ offering as follows:
âAbsolutely market leading, without any shadow of a doubt. Better than peers at tech firms. Air Restaurant makes other options in Soho / Mayfair look like a joke. The staff are amazing, they know your name and preferences. Yesterday for lunch, I had a ribeye, grilled prawns, seared swordfish, blowtorched toro (tuna belly) sashimi, and a slice of wood fired nduja pizza, along with a salad that makes Michelin chefs roll over in bed. Absolutely dunks on any other law firm.â
You can find comprehensive ratings on food and other important factors like legal tech, training quality, and work-life balance on the Legal Cheek Firms Most list 2027.
I must say I do miss tucking into Milbankâs Eggs Royale coupled with a coffee and a can of coke.
P.S. I wont accept criticism as to the choice of beverages from anybody who hasnât experienced the combination. It just works.
I’m not here to comment on your choices but are curious as to how you ended up with such a combination
I’d rather get paid more – fancy lunches aren’t covering my mortgage