Trainee says Linklaters should teach lawyers how to code, Linklaters now teaching lawyers how to code

Magic circle outfit pilots scheme that will see its top legal minds become more tech savvy

code-pic

Global law firm Linklaters is encouraging its lawyers to learn how to create computer code thanks to one forward-thinking trainee.

The firm — keen to embrace the latest technological advances — has revealed a new “pilot programme” which teaches its lawyers “the basics of coding”. Having been approached by a plucky trainee, Linklaters’ top brass decided to green light the initiative, allowing some of the firm’s top legal minds to get their geek on.

For those of you who have visions of Linklaters’ lawyers in Matrix-style leather jackets as green code flies across the computer screen, allow Legal Cheek to explain.

Coding in a legal context essentially means creating a computer system that can identify and classify documents. In theory this means a lawyer could create a code to sift through large volumes of legal documentation, flagging up which ones are important or relevant to a particular case. Speaking to Legal Business, Paul Lewis, a partner at Linklaters, said:

We see coding as very useful for lawyers who are involved in technologies such as blockchain, smart contracts and AI. But, at an even more basic level, it’s also just useful for lawyers to have a grounding in computational logic — it complements all sorts of traditional legal skills

The new programme is just one of a number of new technology-embracing initiatives trumpeted by Linklaters.

Earlier this summer the firm — which offers around 110 training contracts annually — revealed it had put pen to paper on a deal that would see it team up with London-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) service provider RAVN. At the time, a spokesperson for the firm said:

We have a master services agreement in place with RAVN, which was signed recently. Having this agreement will enable us to create statements of work and use the technology if it is likely to be of benefit to us and or our clients.

A host of other firms have brought similar systems on board in an attempt to lighten the load for their junior lawyers. Fellow magic circle player Slaughter and May opted for a robot called Luminance, which, according to its creators, can understand hundreds of pages of complex legal documentation every minute. Meanwhile Clifford Chance’s Kira can help its lawyers quickly analyse contracts and identify potential legal issues.

With AI tech so heavily reliant on coding, it’s clear to see why Linklaters wants its lawyers to have, at the very least, a basic understanding of how it all works.

9 Comments

Anonymous

“NEWS
Trainee says Linklaters should teach lawyers how to code, Linklaters now teaching lawyers how to code”

“NEWS
Trainee says Slaughter and May should pay its lawyers more to retain talen, Slaughter and May still does not listen”

(15)(1)
LOOK AT ME!!!! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

So this has nothing to do with teaching lawyers how to code, and everything to do with teaching them how to use new AI programs?

Misleading headline there. It’s no different from employers teaching their employees how to use more features of Microsoft Excel like macros.

(5)(5)
Anonymous

“Coding in a legal context essentially means creating a computer system that can identify and classify documents. In theory this means a lawyer could create a code to sift through large volumes of legal documentation, flagging up which ones are important or relevant to a particular case.”

What does this actually mean? That sols would write thousands of lines of code to develop a bespoke program for the project or case they are working on? Or that they will enter instructions into proprietary software to perform actions on a database of documents that have been uploaded for search?

If the former, good for Linklaters. Though that seems utterly implausible and an odd use of sols’ time.

If the latter, that’s not coding. That’s just using software packages.

Of course the story might be that sols can go along to classes at Links to learn about coding, so that they become a little more experienced in the very basics of certain clients’ work. Which is good, but hardly revolutionary. Many cases require a brief introduction to the world of the client.

(7)(2)
Anonymous

Potentially the worst reading headline that I have come across in a while.

(4)(0)

Comments are closed.