Research: Judges feel less valued by the public, the media and the profession than they did two years ago

By on

And the majority have concerns about their personal security


New research has revealed judges feel less valued by society than they did two years ago.

Judges were asked how they feel different groups in society value them. Across the board, there was a distinct drop in perceived value between 2014 and 2016.


Only 46 of the 1,559 judges questioned (3%) said they felt the media valued them, while even fewer (38 or 2%) said they felt valued by government.

The Brexit legal challenge perhaps most notably exemplifies this trend. In the days following the High Court’s anti-government ruling — one that was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court — the media lambasted the judges involved and described them as “enemies of the people”.


However, while the profession was quick to rally around the judiciary following these scathing attacks, only 62% feel valued by lawyers, the new data reveals.

However, this overall figure disguises a distinct difference between types of judges. While 85% of Court of Appeal and 82% of High Court judges said they felt valued by the legal profession, only 45% of Upper Tribunal and 35% of First Tier Tribunal judges could say the same.

This data is all part of the 2016 UK Judicial Attitude Survey, which questioned serving salaried judges about the job and their perception of it.

Other interesting headlines from the data include that 76% of judges feel their working conditions have deteriorated in the past two years. Sixty-four percent of judges rated the morale of court staff as poor, while 43% described the maintenance of their court building in the same terms.

A particularly interesting section of the report looks at judges’ concerns about their security. Just over half (51%) said they sometimes worry in court about their personal security as a result of their judicial role, while 37% admitted this concern follows them outside the courtroom. This was a new question asked in the 2016 survey, therefore the result cannot be compared with a 2014 figure.

personal security

Again, this stat differs greatly depending on the judicial post. District judges are most fearful, with 76% admitting they sometimes have concerns for their personal safety in court. Down the other end of the spectrum, only 18% of Court of Appeal judges said the same. However, Court of Appeal judges are among the most anxious about their safety on social media. Twenty-one percent confessed they sometimes have concerns, second only to circuit judges (22%) and just ahead of High Court judges (19%).

Despite these gloomy findings, most of the judges (61%) that took part in the survey agreed that, retrospectively, they still would have applied to be a judge.


For all the latest news, features, events and jobs, sign up to Legal Cheek’s weekly newsletter here.


Not Amused

Respect is earned.



What an utterly stupid thing to say.



Good to know the MOJ is splurging cash on fuzzy feelgood surveys when Legal Aid is being cut to the bone.



Having done some work for the UCL Judicial Institute, which the MoJ commissioned to do these surveys, I can tell you that cash is not being “splurged”. There is a real need for this research, especially if anyone wants to a) prevent more judges from choosing to retire early due to poor conditions and b) make the bench a worthwhile career choice for up-and-coming lawyers (which the recent rounds of High Court recruitment have demonstrated not to be the case).


Liberal Boy

Boohoo, stop being enemies of the people and blocking Brexit and people might like you.



They are not ‘blocking Brexit’…they are making sure it is done properly within legal boundaries.


Anonymous Coward

Who cares? Judicial posts are not popularity contests.

That’s the entire concept of an independent judiciary. They aren’t subject to populism.



Call the waaambulance. Judges don’t have an automatic right to be respected and “feel valued by society”; no-one does.



I could not agree more. Why should they be valued any more than the police or civil servants? All of these people do jobs just as important to proper functioning of our society.


Lovely Liz

After the loss in value of the £ v $, circuit judges and below are on less than a NQ at US firms. No wonder they’re peeved, even if it isn’t all about the money.



Should have not tried to block Brexit.



Do people still not get the whole Brexit thing? Judges weren’t trying to block it – a case came to the court and they had to decide it on the law, err… that’s what judges do. They didn’t decide to interfere in the process.



I wonder how popular Lady Hale is amongst property law lecturers



Who gives a shit? Why is legal cheek shit?



And yet here you are…



Funny how these populists criticise judges for ‘blocking’ Brexit when actually, they were upholding that slightly important thing known as Parliamentary sovereignty and trying to mitigate the constitutional mess that these populists have created.


Ciaran Goggins

They have certainly arrived at a place where they cannot guarantee their safety.


Dominic D'Souza

Great article Katie


Comments are closed.