News

Bill allowing judges aged 66+ to apply for Lord Chief Justice post presented today

By on
13

Keith Vaz to older judges’ rescue?

Keith Vaz MP will present a bill today which, if passed, will give older judges the opportunity to apply to be the next Lord Chief Justice.

Lawyers were left scratching their heads when the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) revealed prospective Lord Chief Justices would have to be younger than 66-years-old to apply. This is so the next top judge can serve four years in the post, before they reach the statutory retirement age of 70.

Not only was this age limit unexpected, it also ruled out a number of front-runners. Clear favourites Sir Brian Leveson, of phonehacking inquiry fame, and Lady Justice Hallett were knocked out of the race because they’re both 67-years-old. This opened the floor to Lady Justice Sharp, who at just 61-years-old qualified for Lord Chief Justice stardom.

The confusion and annoyance rumbled on into March. Yesterday, speaking before the Constitution Committee, JAC chairman Lord Kakkar was asked who was responsible for imposing the age limit. He seemed to point the finger at Liz Truss.

But before the blame game got fully underway, Vaz has now announced he’ll be introducing a bill to parliament to disregard the age of candidates vying for Lord Thomas’ job. A member of the Justice Select Committee and a former practising solicitor, Vaz said losing talent on the basis of age is “poor practice which hinders the process of finding the best legal minds in a mire of technicalities”. He continued:

If there are concerns that those appointed must serve for a reasonable length of time, exceptions can surely be made to delay retirement until Heads of Division have completed their service.

The bill is scheduled to be presented at 12.30pm today and, in full, reads:

Bill to require those responsible for the selection and interviewing of candidates for, and appointment to, the posts of Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of England and Wales, the Keeper or Master of the Rolls and Records of the Chancery of England and the President of the Family Division of the High Court of England and Wales to disregard the age of applicants under 70 years of age; and for connected purposes.

For all the latest news, features, events and jobs, sign up to Legal Cheek’s weekly newsletter here.

13 Comments

Anonymous

Mr Vaz still has a job …

(3)(0)

Anonymous

Mr Vaz still has a knob …

(1)(0)

Anonymous

This post has been removed because it breached Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(0)(0)

Anonymous

Mr Vaz still has a blob …

(1)(0)

Anonymous

Whatever the rent boys got paid it wasn’t enough…

(4)(0)

Anonymous

Absolutely! Disgusting behaviour by Vaz

Anonymous

Private Member’s Bills aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

In any event, it would be far more helpful if there was a change of the retirement age across the board for judges given the recruitment crisis. Why force out perfectly good judges at 70 if they cannot be replaced?

(5)(1)

Anonymous

Agreed, at a time when so many people are having their retirement age increased, and the general expectation that people will live longer, surely it is time to review the position with judges? Certainly in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court at least. Most of them are only going to go into arbitration type roles in any event.

(3)(0)

lol

Because they are liable to be demented maybe?

(0)(0)

Not Amused

Hmmmm …

Isn’t this the case of a Member of Parliament presenting a Bill in order to advance the interests of a tiny group of known individuals? Is that entirely appropriate? What links does Mr Vaz have to these individuals?

(3)(5)

Anonymous

That’s every single article today you posted on NA. Do you even have job? Seriously starting to sdoubt it right now

(9)(0)

Anonymous

Keith Vaz should be in prison.

(6)(0)

Anonymous

Is this to make sure the right man gets the job?

(0)(0)

Comments are closed.