Put a cork in it! Mail Online expresses shock at ‘barristers earning £300,000 a year’ recommending budget supermarket wine

Tabloid picked up on comments made by two lawyers in Counsel Magazine

The Mail Online has seized on an article about bargain wines printed in a magazine for, it says, “barristers earning £300,000 a year”.

The Counsel Magazine article in question is called ‘Summer Wine 2017’, and was penned by 11KBW silk Sean Jones and City Law School’s Professor Dominic Regan.

Alongside a fetching picture of three glasses of Rosé, the barrister magazine’s resident wine critics recommend readers stock up on, for example, Co-op’s “luscious” Chilean Pinoit Noir (£8), Lidl’s Confidence Côtes de Gascogne (£5.50) and Tesco Finest Gascogne 2016 (£6.50). More expensive bottles (Henry’s Drive Padthaway 2012 (£16.99); Provence’s Chateau d’Esclans Whispering Angel (£17)) are also name checked.

A screenshot of the Counsel Magazine article

The Mail Online has taken this story and given it the tabloid treatment. The headline on its piece is: ‘Who needs Châteauneuf-du-Pape? Magazine for barristers earning £300,000 a year recommends bargain wines from Aldi, Lidl and Morrisons for less than £8 (and it proves expensive plonk is not always better)’.

While it is undeniable some top barristers earn into the hundreds of thousands, the bar’s fat cat stereotype needs to be rethought. Bar Council data shows that while 16% of barristers (approximately 2,500) do, indeed, earn over £240,000, 13% of the profession (roughly 2,000) make do with £30,000 or less.

These earnings estimates do not factor in that key overheads need to be deducted, such as travel, insurance and office space, which the Bar Council estimates “together account for about half of a barrister’s turnover.” Taking this all into account, very few barristers will be on £300,000 a year (a figure restated in the tabloid piece’s first paragraph). Indeed, Regan quipped to Legal Cheek:

Maybe counsel working for the Mail earn £300k a year!

To the newspaper’s credit, the ‘all barristers are balling’ message is tempered with some much-needed wisdom further down the piece (though note the silks gaffe):

[A] barrister’s salary can vary widely depending on what type of law they practice and what chambers or organisation they work for. Some silks, who are all self-employed, earn as little as £12,000 in the first year of qualifying.

Furthermore, some understanding of the vast differences in advocate earnings has shone through in the comments section. One reader said most advocates are “barely solvent these days”, given that “rates have remained the same since 1992”. Another comment read: “Criminal barristers turn over around £70k a year and make around £30k if they are lucky). The only ones who drag the average up to £60k do eg shipping, tax etc”.

Not everyone’s so sure. The replies to the above £30k a year comment include: “absolutely incorrect” and “You are so wrong! They earn a hell of a lot more than that.” A fellow Mail Online enthusiast said: “At £1,000pa, working, say, 46 weeks and 40 hours per week ought to come to £1.84 Million by my calculator”. While one reader commented: “ive never heard of any suck low paid lawyers ever except the ones still training doing their articles.”

Despite the mixed comments, Regan told us that, overall, he’s pretty happy with the Mail Online piece. He also said:

Speaking for myself, not Sean, I get more feedback on wine writing than anything I have ever written about civil procedure. Strange but true.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.



It is very interesting all this talk of pay and such. I wonder what Katie King earns.

A) 19,999 or less
B) 20,000 to 29,999
C) 30,000 to 39,999
D) 40,000+


Do you care about how Katie might feel when you write this rubbish? (No doubt you laughed your little heads off while writing..)

Corbyn. Symphathiser

One can get some lovely wines, especially at Lidl or Aldi, for not much at all. I myself am a big fan of Cremant, which can be picked up in Lidl for under £10.


what is this non-story? An article based upon an article based upon an article?! Why!?!?


It is hilarious isn’t it, the number of people that come here slating LC for not being the something like the financial times.


It’s actually an article about and article about an article (Legal Cheek – Mail – Counsel Magazine)


That is what OP said… Also – *an. I was going to comment on how you wasted your time ( and in a sense I now have), but sadly I have now wasted more time than that responding.


The public would get a shock if the BSB published the statistics about the number of barristers going bust.

HMRC is killing off a lot who have had their income slashed and can’t afford to pay their bills.

I bet there are a lot of staff at the Daily Fail who get £300K a year for writing pure shite such as the article referred to.


That’s the trouble with being at the independent Bar. You’re always using current income to pay last years taxes, and if your income goes down, HMRC decide to bankrupt you so you can’t practise. One of the reasons many counsel work til they drop- they’re always chasing the last tax bill.

Main reason I went in house before it was too late and haven’t looked back…

Curious George

Real counsel please publish (albeit anonymously)

– Area of law
– Call
– In house/Chambers


Insolvency/3 year practising (5 year call)/£205k (gross)


I billed over 1,500 hours of work on CFA’s at £250 per hour. Do the math.

Wig jockey

Public law/human rights (defendant). Chambers. 190k (gross)


Commercial. Chambers. 350k.

So the Mail was right about me!


Writing an article to complain about another article complaining about a wine advisory leaflet.

Katie King classic! Boring, uninformative drivel.

#FlingtheKing #MakeLCgreatagain

Impoverished lawyer who hasn't even hit the top tax bracket

Please sir, will you buy me a sandwich?

Impoverished lawyer who hasn't even hit the top tax bracket

One day you will suffer for your greed


Sean Jones QC will earn over £300,000 per year.

Why all the faux outrage?

Criminal barristers love to talk about how little they earn, but this piece wasn’t about you. So just go back to comparing cock sizes with your colleagues at the criminal bar – the rest of us don’t want to hear.


Comments are closed.