News

DLA Piper keeps 75 NQs as Addleshaw Goddard retains 38 rookies

By on
26

From sizeable cohorts come solid results

DLA Piper and Addleshaw Goddard have unveiled their 2017 retention results.

From a huge qualifying cohort of 96, DLA Piper confirmed that 75 soon-to-be associates had put pen to paper on permanent deals. Equating to a score of 78%, the global firm was, at the time of publication, unable to provide details on how many offers it made or the destinations of its recruits.

According to DLA’s UK managing partner, Sandra Wallace, the outfit had an unusually large number of NQs this year. She said:

In 2015, the firm had an above average trainee intake in the UK. We pride ourselves on our strong retention rates and, whilst this has resulted in our retention percentage being slightly lower than normal, we are delighted that this year we have been able to offer more NQ roles than in recent years.

The latest retention result comes just weeks after DLA — which usually offers about 70 training contracts a year — upped rookie and trainee remuneration.

Its London NQs now earn £75,000, up from £70,000 (7% boost), while their regional counterparts will start on a salary of £42,000, up from £41,000 (2% boost). City trainees saw their pay elevated to £44,000 in year one and £49,000 in year two, equating to rises of 5% and 4% respectively.

Elsewhere, Addleshaw Goddard — known as the ‘northern giant’ thanks to its strong presence in both Leeds and Manchester — revealed that 38 of its 47 NQs are staying put. This equates to an impressive retention score of 81%. The firm was unable to provide a breakdown of which offices or departments its new lawyers would be qualifying into, but did tell us all 47 trainees received an offer.

Today’s retention score means Addleshaw Goddard has equalled its 2016 performance. On that occasion the outfit kept 22 of its 27 NQs or 81%. Its new recruits will earn £62,000 in London and £40,000 in the regions.

Trainee autumn retention 2017

Firm Score Breakdown
Burges Salmon 100% 28/28
Watson Farley & Williams 100% 15/15
Fieldfisher 100% 13/13
Blake Morgan 100% 9/9
Forsters 100% 8/8
Sullivan & Cromwell 100% 4/4
Latham & Watkins 95% 21/22
Ashurst 95% 19/20
Macfarlanes 92% 23/25 (two on FTC*)
Slaughter and May 91% 29/32
Travers Smith 90% 18/20
Ince & Co 90% 9/10
Stephenson Harwood 90% 9/10
Blake Morgan 89% 8/9
Reed Smith 86% 12/14
Allen & Overy 85% 40/47
Linklaters 84% 47/56
Gowling WLG 84% 21/25
Bird & Bird 83% 15/18
White & Case 83% 15/18
Covington & Burling 83% 5/6
Osborne Clarke 82% 14/17
RPC 82% 14/17
Clifford Chance 81% 42/52
Addleshaw Goddard 81% 38/47
Bond Dickinson 81% 22/27
Eversheds Sutherland 80% 44/55
Herbert Smith Freehills 80% 28/35
Hogan Lovells 80% 24/30
Clyde & Co 79% 34/43 (one on FTC)
Mills & Reeve 79% 15/19 (one on FTC)
DLA Piper 78% 75/96
Simmons & Simmons 78% 21/27
Shearman & Sterling 75% 12/16
Pinsent Masons 74% 67/91
Mayer Brown 73% 8/11
Withers 73% 8/11
Trowers & Hamlins 70% 7/10
Berwin Leighton Paisner 67% 16/24
Browne Jacobson 67% 6/9
Freshfields 66% 27/41
Dentons 64% 18/28
Mishcon de Reya 64% 9/14
Taylor Wessing 62% 16/26
Kirkland & Ellis 56% 5/9
Weil Gotshal 50% 5/10
Stewarts Law 25% 1/4

*Fixed term contract

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub.

26 Comments

Anonymous

Decent stats considering the sheer number of trainees compared to other firms. Nearly 100 trainees is always going to present a challenge.

(13)(0)

Anonymous

Exactly. Imagine if they kept all on. That would be madness.

Burges Salmon still top the list. I like receiving their beautiful salmon pink paper. Largely due to the fact it means they are acting for the other side on a matter. Cats toying with pigeons.

(7)(0)

Anonymous

Ah, but all their lawyers have sparkling CV’s and love non contentious work to avoid having to confront another person. Their favourite thing is bragging about being a Bristol firm when the reality is they get the train in and walk 1 minute from the station to their office and rarely engage with the local market.

(4)(0)

BS Lawyer

Meow

(0)(0)

Anonymous

Yes, you will meow because that’s what pussies do.

(4)(0)

Anonymous

So many NQs! Pied Piper of Hamelin.

(1)(0)

Anonymous

75 NQs? What an utter boiler room…

(4)(5)

Anonymous

Largest UK based first with 8 UK offices. I know there are only around 30 trainees in London which is pretty typical.

(4)(0)

Anonymous

UK based firm*

(1)(1)

Anonymous

CMS.

(5)(0)

Inquisitor

I quote Tommy on 8 September. “At the time of publication there is one big name absent from our table. CMS — which recently merged with City duo Nabarro and Olswang — is still to reveal its autumn figures. Legal Cheek understands that the numbers are being finalised and will be released very soon.” Very soon? VERY SOON? That was a lie wasn’t it Tommy?

(3)(0)

Anonymous

They’re going to fixed term contract themselves out of embarrassment. Mark my words.

(0)(1)

Breesus Christ

WHO DAT WHO DAT

(0)(0)

Dissappointed A&O Trainee

Do we not think that the Magic Circle should be given a separate table due to the increased difficulty and prestige?

Seems rather odd to include them with the masses.

(1)(13)

Anonymous

Get off your high horse, you are nothing special.

(11)(1)

NQ at Linklaters ('Links')

I beg to differ.

It is particularly nice up here on my stallion.

(1)(4)

Anonymous

Can’t spell disappointed either. They obviously can’t be trusted with a computer so should be chained to the photocopier.

(2)(0)

Anonymous

He puts the Diss into dissappointed

(1)(0)

Andy Murray

Your gender assumption is alarming.

(0)(0)

Anonymous

What a colossal twat.

(0)(0)

Anonymous

It would be interesting to know the CMS rates. Should be about 60-70%.

(0)(0)

A miserable cunt

THE CMS RESULTS ARE OUT

(0)(0)

Anonymous

C(hlamydia) +ve
M(easles) +ve
S(hingles) +ve

(1)(0)

Bongo

CMS IZ SHIT

(1)(0)

Anonymous

What about Norton Rose? Does that firm still exist?

(0)(0)

Anonymous

AG didn’t make offers to all of its trainees and a few are on fixed term contracts. Take these articles with a pinch of salt.

(1)(0)

Comments are closed.