News

The (unofficial) results are in: Archbold victorious in battle of criminal law bibles

By on
8

Three-quarters of barristers back old text over newer rival

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has revealed 75% of its members would rather use an alternative, more traditional practitioners’ text than the version currently favoured by the courts.

Since 1822, judges and lawyers would usually refer to Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice in the courtroom. The red-backed book costs £395 and weighs 2.64kg.

Then, in July last year, a group of judges decided that the popular practitioners’ text should be replaced by the much newer Blackstone’s Criminal Practice.

The latest comments from across Legal Cheek

While the text is both lighter (2.58kg) and cheaper (£375), last year’s decision upset some lawyers who were fans of Archbold. The switch also created confusion when both texts were referred to during criminal trials.

The CBA, the representative group for criminal barristers, also had concerns about how last year’s decision was made. In the words of Chris Henley QC, the association’s vice chairman, judges made the call “at the last minute, when many of us had already committed to purchase one or other.” He also lambasted the “complete lack of consultation”.

The CBA called on its members to share their views on the battle of the criminal law bibles. Now, the CBA has revealed the bar overwhelmingly prefers the older, heavier, more expensive text to its newer, lighter, cheaper cousin. Carmelite Chambers’ Henley said:

“The result of the CBA’s online consultation on practitioners’ preference for Archbold or Blackstones is interesting. 597 members responded. 75% said they prefer to use Archbold, 20% Blackstones and 5% said they had no preference.”

The next step is for these results to be communicated to the senior judiciary. Judges have argued that switching the texts has saved approximately £100,000.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub

8 Comments

Anonymous

That is a lot of money for a BOOK. LOLburrito!

John C

It’s a lot of book!!

Anonymous

Surely criminal judges need to have access to both books?

Anonymous

I dont agree. Lets have a second referendum.

Anonymous

How about Archbold just wake up to commercial realities and lower to price of their book to Blackstone levels? If they can’t do that and go out of business then so be it, but it isn’t up to the state to artificially subsidise the publisher when a cheaper and roughly equivalent alternative is available for stocking the nation’s court rooms.

Legal Aid Pauper

I blame immigration!!!

Immigration Barrister

If this was somehow about immigration law, the book would cost £700, we’d be charged £1300, receive only 85% of the pages, and only have half of it drafted in a way that makes any sense.

Anonymous

But some really earnest people would have written it

Join the conversation

Related Stories