‘Even the most hungover first year law student would understand this’: Journalists’ Article 50 gaffe will make you cringe

Avatar photo

By Katie King on

Lawyers more than happy to correct them

Social media has erupted into a series of ‘I know my law better than you’ squabbles.

In one corner: journalists, namely LBC radio host Iain Dale and editor of the Spectator Fraser Nelson. Both men recently reignited the debate around the Gina Miller case, which concluded in the Supreme Court almost a year ago. Readers will no doubt remember the bench of 11 justices ruled that Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty can only be triggered following a free vote in parliament.

For the avoidance of doubt, the court did not rule on whether Article 50 is reversible. Devereux Chambers barrister Jolyon Maugham QC had planned to bring a legal question to this effect to the High Court in Ireland, however this was discontinued this spring.

Weird, then, when former Tory politician Dale retweeted the following tweet, which included a screenshot of a Business Insider article from January, claiming the Miller case ruled Article 50 is irreversible:

In his tweet (embedded below), Dale described Article 50’s revocability as “another lie from Remainers”. He also name checked Lord Kerr, a Scottish Lord who was part of the team that drafted Article 50 (not to be confused with the Supreme Court justice of the same surname). Kerr has said on record that triggering the treaty provision can be reversed.

Dale wasn’t the only journalist interested in the Miller case this weekend. Nelson also tweeted a screenshot of the Business Insider article alongside a caption to the effect of ‘the Supreme Court said Article 50 cannot be revoked’. He has since deleted this tweet, but screenshots remain on the social media site.

The double-whammy of gaffes has been music to the legal Twitterati’s ears, who rarely shy away from legal fact-checking. One now retired technology disputes lawyer said Nelson’s comment was simply “wrong, wrong, wrong”:

A selection of other responses include the Secret Barrister’s contention that he “expected better” from Dale, and University of Sussex professor of public law Lindsay Stirton’s “they’re making this sh*t up”. Our favourite of all, however, came from Hélène Tyrrell, an academic at Newcastle Law School:

Nelson has since deleted his tweet but has not apologised for it. Dale, however, is sticking with his guns, tweeting:

Much to the concern of public law experts like King’s College London’s James Lee:

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub

Related Stories

Daily Express forced to make huge correction to human rights story, again

Yet the tabloid newspaper has just released a slideshow explainer about the ECHR...

Mar 23 2017 12:28pm