Two elderly men by a roaring fire: Top crime QC describes her Oxbridge interview in new play

By on

Review of The Robing Room, a monologue performed by and about Felicity Gerry QC

A new play dramatically weaves two storylines together: the personal experiences of complex crime barrister Felicity Gerry QC, from her humble beginnings as “an Essex girl” to high-flying a international lawyer, and one of her many dramatic court cases involving a rape and murder.

The Robing Room is written as a monologue by playwright Ness Lyons — who is a former employment lawyer and currently a legal consultant — and features a hilarious account of Gerry’s interview at an Oxbridge college.

In it, she describes the two elderly male interviewers: “They sat me by a roaring fire and interrogated me about the legal principles involved in a hypothetical situation: me stealing my own umbrella. It’s a famous scenario but I didn’t know it at the time — I hadn’t had any legal training! They kept on at me, asking questions, until I lost my temper, sparking like the flames in the grate, and said: ‘You teach me the law and I’ll tell you the answer.'”

Needless to say, the play’s central character continues: “I didn’t get in.”

The latest comments from across Legal Cheek

The play’s other story is both tragic and graphic: the true-story murder case of a woman who posted a ‘Lonely Hearts’ advertisement only to be raped and murdered by the man who answered the ad. Gerry acted for the prosecution in the case.

Lyons — who was commissioned by the First 100 Years project to write the ten-minute monologue — says that she wanted to “honour the victim in the case and her sad, tawdry death” as well as explore the “more human side of being a female barrister”.

The play was recently performed at a First 100 Years event held at Simmons & Simmons in London. The First 100 Years project celebrates the 100 years since women could practise as lawyers.

Gerry, who practises at Carmelite Chambers in London and also teaches in Australia, tells Legal Cheek:

“Lyons has managed to put together my own personal experiences with what I do as a barrister. It combines my emotional story with the court’s more clinical story. Courts are forensic, they have to be; you are professional at all times and keep your emotions apart. But of course real life isn’t like that. I am not really like that. This play demonstrates that.”

After her Oxbridge debacle, Gerry went on to study law at Kingston Polytechnic (now a university) and then at the Inns of Court School of Law (as City Law School was then known).

She is keen to stress that Oxbridge “is changing”, and has been invited to speak as part of a programme at Lady Margaret Hall in Oxford to encourage pupils from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds to apply there.

Gerry also believes the bar is an excellent place for anyone who wants to do things in their own way and isn’t conformist (and doesn’t have the ‘right’ background): “You can talk to anyone and be anyone at the bar. It is full of interesting people and they all bring something different. I worked out that I will never ‘fit in’ at the bar but I also worked out that you don’t have to. You can plough your own furrow.”

Lyons is looking to develop The Robing Room into a wider piece. She has also just completed another full-length play entitled Bed of Shame about a first-year law student who is desperate to fit in. She is exposed and shamed on social media at a time when the whole campus is talking about — or refusing to talk about — consent: “The play explores how far she’ll go to get retribution and poses the question ‘just what is justice anyway?'”

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub



God, how ghastly! I’ve spent enough time listening to her grating voice in court to never want to hear it again.


At least you were listening 😉


this is the reason we have the golden jurisdiction

those pesky yankees had women lawyers from the 1850s and a judicature like reform from the 1840s

don’t tell the children this

let them bask in our glory

Not Amused

Behaving like that will, rightly, result in a candidate being rejected.

We have just had David Lammy terrifying BME applicants for his own personal advancement just after Oxbridge applications were made. Is it really necessary for every remaining narcissist willing to upset and disturb children just to get a bit of attention to crawl out of the wood work now?

Young people are about to be called to interview. That process is difficult enough without this sort of off putting commentary going on.

Oxbridge does not need to “change”. The candidate was rightly rejected. If people could show slightly more respect for the impact they have on young people then that would be much appreciated. All Oxbridge interviews will be over by 20 December – you can surely all wait until then to spout nonsense.


How did your oxbridge interview go, Not Amused?

Benny Goodman

In the context of these two individuals in particular, I would say spot on.


Which two individuals? Spot on how? Don’t get what you mean.

Benny Goodman

Sorry that was a reply to NA’s post! i.e. in relation to Felicity Gerry and David Lammy.


Lawyers non shocka in talking about their favourite thing in the world – themselves.


Was the picture deliberately chosen to resemble this well-known silk ?


telling tales out of school always ends in tears


Is there any chance you might be able to spell check and proof read your work? It’s always full of basic errors! For example, random words in sentences, like paragraph 2.

I’m assuming you are soooooo busy writing amazing content that you don’t have time to proof read!


If this isn’t self-serving, I really don’t know what is.


“Gerry also believes the bar is an excellent place for anyone who wants to do things in their own way and isn’t conformist (and doesn’t have the ‘right’ background)”

So she’s a comedy writer?

Join the conversation