News

Dentons investigated by SRA over faked notes scandal

By on
13

Largest law firm in the world in firing line after slam by tribunal in staff discrimination case

Dentons has referred itself to the regulator after a tribunal cited a “lack of honesty” in the global firm.

The outfit, the largest in the world by lawyer headcount, in December 2017 lost a claim brought against it by a former recruitment manager. Bina Hale was made redundant by the firm just months after giving birth and while still on maternity leave, following what the tribunal decision described as a “difficult pregnancy”.

There were two other recruiters who could’ve been made redundant, but were saved from this fate after being judged to be more professional. But the tribunal said the reasons given for Hale’s lower professionalism score “gave us the impression of someone scratching around desperately for justification” — particularly given the other team members had been at the firm for a shorter time than Hale.

Hale — who was described by a corporate partner as being a “Marmite character” — felt the situation was “unacceptable and unfair”, and her solicitors called the entire redundancy process “a sham”. She was successful in her claim for sex discrimination and unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal in Bury St Edmunds.

The 2018 Firms Most List

Now, eyes turn to the law firm’s conduct during the redundancy process, which was slighted by the tribunal. A spokesperson for the law firm tells us it conducted an internal investigation following the judgment’s release and has shared details on this with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). “We are now working with the SRA on their own investigation, and expect its findings to be published within the next few weeks,” they continued.

The main point of contention, it seems, for the tribunal surrounded the notes made by two of Dentons’ people, HR manager Suzanne Barnes and Hale’s line manager, Emma Rowe.

In the judgment, it says Barnes met with Hale on three occasions but “destroyed” handwritten notes she’d purported to have made at the time. The tribunal, on this, questioned:

“Barnes destroyed the notes that she had made. One has to ask oneself, why would she do that?… Was she hiding something?”

Tribunal members’ eyebrows were also raised by a document written by Rowe, “purporting to represent the notes she used for her discussion with Mrs Hale over the telephone” about “why she had scored Mrs Hale less than the others for professionalism”.

Though Rowe claimed the note had been torn out of her day book, which is filled with brown paper, the note was written on white paper. Also: “The date was wrong and extraordinarily, the date on Ms Barnes’ typed note was also wrong, with the same incorrect date. One of them was copying from the other, after the event.”

The tribunal described Rowe’s evidence as “muddled and unconvincing” and “not credible”. “We have found that Mrs Rowe retrospectively made up her handwritten notes,” the tribunal said. The SRA said: “We will gather all relevant information and decide on any next steps.”

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub

13 Comments

KK

Wenger is finally out though fam!!!

(10)(0)

Anonymous

Shut down McDentons

(8)(1)

Anonymous

The SRA need to crack down on this, suspending people from practising for a period or striking off the roll is the way to do it and stamp out such bad practices.

(0)(0)

Anonymous

Sh1t firm

(6)(1)

Anonymous

Until as recently as 2010 Dentons 1was London corporate outfit Denton Wilde Sapte and was hardly well known for truthfulness, and uprightness regarding its employees and partners. There are enough publications, some of them high profile that hardly bring any credit or credibility to this law firm now known as Dentons. Well done SRA. Finally time to close Dentons.

(9)(0)

Anonymous

The arrogance of this firm is shocking! The case is the most shocking damming verdict I have ever seen a judge pass ! I hope the payment by the courts is huge – otherwise it will have little impact on this firm ! SRA should fire the board and senior management for their handling of this case , why did they let it get this far? with so many skeletons .. well done Hale ! They clearly underestimate her !

(9)(0)

Anonymous

Oh yes! And another exclamation mark! And another!

There are numerous grammatical and other errors in your post! I won’t bother going through them all!

But I will point out that “damming” should be “damning”! I don’t know why, but that spelling mistake really pisses me off whenever I see it!

(3)(6)

Anonymous

In defence of Anonymous at 6:50am The arrogance of this FIRM DENTONS previously known as DENTON WILDE SAPTE is shocking! The case is the most unbelievable and damning verdict I have ever seen a judge pass ! I hope the payment by the courts is huge – otherwise it will have little impact on this firm ! SRA should fire and dismiss the board and senior management for their handling of this case , why did they let it get this far? with so many skeletons since at least 2009 .. well done Hale ! They clearly underestimate her ! Maybe previous cases where employees have been hurt and false disclosures made to court by DENTONS OR ITS PREVIOUS OUT FIT DENTON WILDE SAPTE Should also be re examined!!!!!

(2)(1)

Anonymous

What a moron ! I think you’ve missed the fundamental point of the comment this is not a grammar lesson , The findings are Damming !!!! ( I hope you don’t not go into meltdown with all the mistakes in my post !!!)

(3)(3)

Anonymous

This post has been removed because it breached Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(0)(0)

Anonymous

This post has been removed because it breached Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(1)(0)

Mark Wyatt

I think Emma Rowe is doing a wonderful job at Dentons!
The firm is a major client of my company and I cannot speak highly enough of them!

(0)(5)

Anonymous

This post has been removed because it breached Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(0)(0)

Comments are closed.

Related Stories