HMCTS hits back at claims a criminal barrister’s high heels were confiscated by court staff for being ‘too spiky’

Avatar photo

By Katie King on

Lawyer said colleague had to do hearing in bare feet

Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has responded to claims that a barrister had her shoes confiscated by court staff for being “too spiky”.

Adam King, a barrister at QEB Hollis Whiteman, said a colleague of his had to conduct a hearing in bare feet after an encounter with security at London’s Wood Green Crown Court. He also said his colleague had written to HMCTS by email about the incident.

King’s tweet has racked up hundreds of likes, retweets and comments, with fellow lawyers describing the incident as “disgusting”, “astonishing” and potentially discriminatory.

Susan Acland-Hood, the CEO of HMCTS, was quick to respond, clarifying that “shoes shouldn’t have been confiscated” and that she’ll “sort this incident”. Following enquiries, today HMCTS responded with this statement:

King tells us he’s following this up with HMCTS.

This isn’t the first time criminal barristers have taken to Twitter to air their court security gripes.

In March, one “hungry and confused” family law barrister said her plastic knife and fork were nabbed by security, while in December an academic claimed one of his law students had their notebook confiscated by court staff.

Before then, last summer we reported on the notorious “sip test”, which requires court users to taste unsealed beverages to prove their contents are harmless. Barristers flooded to Twitter to slam the test for “wasting valuable time”.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter