Bar students won’t be told their exam results before resits

By on

BSB says it’s not possible to release grades sooner for ‘quality assurance’ reasons

Students caught up in this summer’s online bar exam fiasco won’t be told their results before resits, and some aren’t too happy about this.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) announced last Friday it will offer students the opportunity to resit the centralised Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) assessments using the traditional ‘pen and paper’ from 5 until 12 October. They have until Monday to register their resit requests but this will be before the results of the August assessments are released in mid-October/November.

Bar student body, Students Against the BSB Exam Regulations (SABER), has today written to the regulator demanding it release provisional moderated grades before the October sit. In an open letter, the group writes:

“We question the rationale of deliberately withholding exam results until after resits and therefore preventing students from making an informed decision about incurring the financial, practical, and psychological costs of preparing for and sitting the exams.”

Other students waded in on SABER’s #ReleasetheResults debate, with one user mocking the BSB’s latest decision: “Go on! Have a guess about whether you passed or not! It’s not like taking a bunch of time off work for gruelling revision is such a big deal and if you don’t wanna give it another crack unnecessarily it’s only your career that hangs in the balance.”

Secure your place: The Legal Cheek Virtual Pupillage Fairs 2020

The BSB explained why results could not be issued sooner. It said: “We understand that candidates might prefer to know their August marks before deciding whether to register for one or more of the October exams but there are a number of quality assurance processes that must be followed before results can be formally confirmed and issued; it is not possible to issue them any earlier. It is also a widely accepted academic principle that a candidate who has passed an exam should not be able to resit that exam simply to improve their mark.”

The statement continued:

“If a candidate is concerned that their grade in August might not reflect their true ability, whether or not they believe that they may have passed, they should opt to resit in October before their August sit results are known, and the better of their August and October grades will then be regarded as definitive. The October exams are open to all candidates who have not exceeded the maximum number of permitted attempts and have been put on as a means of mitigating the issues that any candidates encountered with the August exams. We are therefore treating August and October as the same ‘sit’.”

It added that once the results for the August exams are known to students, they will have an opportunity to resit an exam in December but only if they failed that exam in August.

Last month’s bar exams descended into chaos with reports hitting the national press of students urinating in bottles and buckets over fears their online assessments would be terminated if they went to the toilet. Others faced technical issues, with Twitter aflood with reports of students being locked out of the remote proctoring system. The BSB conceded that around one third of exams were affected by difficulties at some point during the examination period.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub


Bored Of This

Legal Cheek, I beg you stop publishing these articles. Isn’t this meant to be a legal news site? This issue is old and the vast majority don’t care about it. Stop giving the whingebags a platform.


A London Silk

All this whole debacle has done is expose this cohort to be entitled, spoiled and thoroughly unintelligent. Welcome to the latest instalment of the now global scale embarrassment that is the stinking attitude of last year’s BPTC students.


Proper London Counsel

The only option is for the BSB to pre-emptively disbar the entire cohort. At least that way the rest of us would be spared.



Good to see the snowflakes attempt to generate sympathy and spectacularly fail, again.



How long until the snowflakes send out a long letter moaning about this? Looking forward to the diversity points they drag up this time.


Riffat Barq

Students took March opinion and drafting exam in fear, panic and under immense stressful circumstances specially the international student who travelled in emergency back home. So by the end of this year a chance to sit in opinion & drafting exams with automatic mitigation just like August sit of centralized exams, specially those students who couldn’t take August sit of drafting and opinion exams. International students are under extreme financial stress they don’t know how they will be able to continue or complete their studies.



Surprised by the above comments. This is genuinely outrageous and will ruin people’s summer for no reason as many will feel they should re-sit just in case. I would have been knackered if I hadn’t had the summer off after BPTC exams and before my pupillage. There is absolutely no reason the marking procedure – including moderation and ‘quality checks’ – can’t be speeded up by hiring a few more markers. Lawyers work hard to make things happen in short order for court and client deadlines – why can’t the moderator?


Comments are closed.

Related Stories