Post Office scandal: Urgent action against lawyers not necessary, says regulator 

Avatar photo

By Thomas Connelly on

4

Public not at risk


The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has said that there is no evidence indicating that any solicitor linked to the Post Office scandal poses an ongoing risk to the public that requires “urgent action”.

In update on Friday, the regular said it has been gathering evidence through various means, including obtaining a court order compelling the Post Office and Royal Mail Group to hand over relevant documents, and reviewing information shared publicly through the inquiry.

So far, the SRA says it has reviewed tens-of-thousands of pages of information and evidence.

Media scrutiny around the scandal has intensified in recent weeks following the airing of Mr Bates v The Post Office, an ITV drama which documents how hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system known as Horizon.

The 2024 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

“We will take action where we find evidence that solicitors have fallen short of the standards the public expects,” the SRA said.

“Our investigation covers multiple, multifaceted issues where there may have been potential misconduct,” it continued. “New issues and evidence are coming to light on an ongoing basis, particularly from the public inquiry. We expect further relevant evidence from the inquiry in the coming months, when it will look at issues such as the conduct of the group litigation and governance.”

“We expect to be in the best position to take any meaningful action to get the right outcome after the full facts and all the relevant issues have been aired through the inquiry,” the SRA added.

The regulator said it’s keeping its position under constant review and that at present, “we do not have evidence to show that any solicitor presents an ongoing risk to the public that needs to be addressed through urgent action”.

The inquiry into what went wrong first launched in 2020 and is being led by retired High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams. A number of lawyers have already given evidence as to their role in the prosecutions. No end date for the inquiry has been set.

4 Comments

sra critic

Of course not. It’s far more important to charge solicitors for the collapse of Ince and pursue trainees for innocent mistakes!

Djed

Translation: we haven’t yet found a trainee to pin the blame on

Cowboy

What needs to be looked at is whether the basic but rigorous rules of disclosure that the police and CPS have had to apply for decades were applied in the case of each of these poor people who were wrongfully prosecuted . Post Office Lawyers on £100 K plus need to be quaking in their boots for any wilfull blindness not trainees who may have been kept in the dark which has allowed this unforgivable injustice to occur . The truth will out !

Anonymous

They need to be Suspended or put under day to day Supervision of Experienced Barristers/Managers if SRA cannot find a final position of striking off for incompetence where relevant.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Post Office scandal: SRA unlikely to expedite lawyer prosecutions  

Likely wait until inquiry's conclusion

Jan 10 2024 10:38am
10

Post office inquiry: HSF admits using law grads in major disclosure task

Hearing postponed after thousands of documents not disclosed

Sep 6 2023 1:51pm
12