Ban sexual relationships between barristers and pupils, landmark report urges

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

8

Strongly discouraged but currently no regulatory prohibition

Barrister's wig and gown
An independent review has called for a new rule to make it “serious misconduct” for barristers, clerks or chambers’ staff to have sexual relationships with pupils and mini-pupils, in a bid to tackle abuse of power at the bar.

The landmark report, led by Baroness Harriet Harman KC, warns that aspiring barristers are particularly vulnerable to exploitation during the year-long pupillage stage, given the influence chambers hold over tenancy decisions.

“Sexual relationships between pupils and members of chambers or clerks/staff with influence over their careers should be prohibited for the duration of pupillage. This would make it serious misconduct for a barrister, clerk, or chambers’ employee to have a sexual relationship with a pupil, mini-pupil, or anyone undertaking work experience in that chambers,” the report states.

Currently, there is no regulatory prohibition on sexual relationships between pupils and members of chambers or clerks with influence over their careers. The current guidance strongly discourages such relationships due to the obvious risks of coercion and conflicts of interest, but they are not explicitly banned. As a result, the issue is usually left to chambers’ discretion, with policies and enforcement varying widely across the profession.

The prohibition is among a wide-ranging set of recommendations in the Independent Review of Bullying, Harassment and Sexual Harassment at the Bar, published this morning.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Chambers Most List

Other proposals include:

• A new Commissioner for Conduct to oversee standards across the bar and judiciary.
Making training on bullying and harassment mandatory for all students, barristers, chambers’ employees and Inns staff every three years.

• Requiring chambers to adopt anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies, with consistent procedures for handling complaints.

• Introducing tougher sanctions, with the report stressing that bullying, harassment and sexual harassment should be “career-limiting or career-ending”.

• Extending reforms to cover judicial bullying, with calls for greater accountability in courtrooms, abolition of the JCIO’s three-month complaint time limit, and the use of court recordings to support complaints.

Launching the report, Harman KC said the bar must take action now. “Strong sanctions are needed to send the message that things are going to change, that serious misconduct will not be met with a quiet word or a brief suspension but will be career-limiting or career-ending,” she said.

The review concludes that only radical change will end what it describes as a “culture of denial” at the top of the profession.

8 Comments

Bean Counter

There are no sensible data to support this stuff. The campaigners know that. That’s why they use self-reporting surveys and voluntary round tables to generate reports than are designed from the start to over-represent the problem.

Anon

This isn’t the very first time sexual harassment has been reported as a widespread problem at the Bar.

What ulterior motive would so many barristers have to independently report sexual harassment across the profession and across different chambers over many years?

What about those too who report sexual harassment in the entertainment industry, medicine, professional sports, banking, parliament and at other places?

With so many people coming forward in so many different contexts, it points to sexual harassment being a real problem worth addressing.

Urgh

It’s a real pity this report didn’t highlight how any woman working in a voluntary capacity to gain legal or advocacy experience doesn’t have the same protection from sexual harassment as an employee does. An employee can go to an employment tribunal and have a judge hear the facts of their complaint – a volunteer cannot.

I have read legal guides for students which stated that a pupillage application would not be taken seriously unless there was evidence of lots of voluntary advocacy experience on it. So many students are pressured to volunteer to build their legal CVs, and they have been sexually harassed by barristers abusing their position whilst trying to get into the profession.

The best a volunteer can do if someone senior refuses to act to stop the sexual harassment (perhaps out of the hope of not wanting to stop donations from the legal profession) is to approach the police and hope they have the time to deal with it.

There is literally one law for volunteers when it comes to sexual harassment, and another from employees.

US Partner

Oh, how charming of you to suggest that the only way to get some valuable advocacy experience is by putting up with a bit of sexual harassment. Honestly, I’d have thought that was a bit of an overreach. Your analysis of the situation is rather unusual.

Frankly, I’m more bothered about whether the young ones can actually think critically than about their run-in with the odd perv.

Associate

I volunteered at one law-based charity where a future pupil barrister genuinely asked a member of staff if he was being asked to work with a female student on a tribunal case because he was single.

It wasn’t. He was asked to offer back-up as their schizophrenic client had a past history of racist outbursts. He really thought the organisation was going to hand women to him for romantic purposes, and none of the staff questioned it.

I’m not sure if these types of people could exist outside of chambers in the world of HR departments and larger corporations.

Justice Prevails

If it’s consensual, why should we care? A teacher can be in a relationship with his student, so long as it’s consensual. There is nothing wrong with that. See Macron as an example.

People are overthinking relationships and this wokery must stop right now.

Alex

Your titling at windmills there. This has nothing to do with consent and everything to do with middle aged plus women pulling the ladder up behind them, annoyed that some young women wish to trade their youth and attractiveness for experience and lifestyle.

Realist

We’re talking about the Bar here, not Size 6 yoga instructors being picked up by bankers on Tinder.

How many pupil barristers trade on their looks to get a tenancy, and since when can a senior member of chambers make someone a KC??

Join the conversation