News

Exclusive: Attorney General responds to Bar anger at his ‘foolish’ barristers comment

By on
3

Legal Cheek‘s Kevin Poulter has just asked Attorney General Dominic Grieve what he meant by his comment last night that criminal barristers “would be foolish to resist” the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA). Grieve’s response is below…

“The point I was making last night,” the Attorney General told Poulter, was that to “go on strike or stop working” over QASA “would be a mistake”.

As a former criminal barrister himself, Grieve added: “I’m perfectly aware that QASA is controversial. I can understand – indeed I have some sympathy for the criminal Bar’s view – that it is something which they’d prefer not to have.”

He then fired this warning to barristers: “The criminal Bar would find itself in a very difficult position if it were to be seen to be resisting this move, because I don’t think that it is likely to have public opinion on its side in the arguments it is putting forward.”

It seems unlikely that this message will appease the likes of Twitter Joke Trial silk John Cooper QC, who this morning tweeted:

The full interview – in which Grieve goes on to predict that the Bar will shrink over the next few years, noting that there were just 3,500 practising barristers as recently as the late 1960s (there are four times as many now) – is below…

3 Comments

Mark

Not only calling us foolish, but now thinly veiled threats? Kudos Dominic, kudos.

(0)(0)

pogsy

I would love to see the barristers for 1 year, then everyone will see that they were not needed in the first place.
In the main the only thing they add to a court case is cost.
If they were all on strike the accused would not be at a disadvantage a the prosicution would not have a barrister either i.e. Neutral outcome.

(0)(0)

Fighter

Pogsy ? Really ? Wait until someone accuses you of doing something you haven’t done and then still say you don’t want someone fighting your corner. Your views are the sort of views that allow the politicians to get away with misleading the public.

(0)(0)

Comments are closed.