Skip to content

‘Law Undergraduate of the Year’ competition removes minimum A-level requirement after Twitter uproar

Avatar photo

By Alex Aldridge on

AAB requirement no longer applies, confirms City law firm sponsor

lead

The ‘Law Undergraduate of the Year’ competition has ditched its minimum A-level requirement after a storm of anger in the legal Twittersphere.

The furore began on Saturday when Birkbeck College professor Matthew Weait spotted that the competition included a condition barring from entry anyone without at least two As and a B at A-level.

And it continued this morning when Weait tweeted his email of complaint (pictured below) about the clause to the competition’s sponsor, Mayer Brown.

studentofyear-letter

As Weait points out, a minimum A-level requirement could indirectly indiscriminate against clever students who didn’t go to great schools but went on to do well at university.

Happily for wannabe lawyers of this ilk, Mayer Brown moved swiftly today to remove the requirement. A spokeswoman for the firm told Legal Cheek:

“The intention was for the competition to mirror our criteria for vac scheme entrants generally. We would like to make clear that there is no minimum A-level requirement. While most of our trainees have at least AAB we actively seek to recruit talented candidates who are on course to get a good degree via another route.”

She added that the firm’s commitment to diversity is underlined by its ongoing ‘CV Blind’ graduate recruitment pilot.

The closing date for entries to the ‘Law Undergraduate of the Year’ competition — which is run by recruitment company Target Jobs — is 4 February 2015.

Related Stories

6 in 10 aspiring barristers fail to secure pupillage first time, research finds

Missed out on pupillage first time round? You’re not alone

Apr 10 2026 12:01pm
17
news SQE Hub

80% of SQE students say route ‘not fit for purpose’ as junior lawyers group calls for urgent review

Concerns around delivery, affordability and impact on wellbeing

Apr 9 2026 8:39am
26