Not guilty: Man accused of robbing High Court judge on Middle Temple Lane cleared of wrongdoing

By on

Terry Brown offered no defence and refused to leave his prison cell during the trial

A man who allegedly mugged a top judge in the heart of legal London has been cleared by a jury at Inner London Crown Court.

Terry Brown, from Bethnal Green, London, was accused of robbing Sir Robin Knowles CBE QC on Middle Temple Lane on 27 September last year.

The prosecution alleged that Brown — who offered no defence and refused to leave his prison cell during the trial — approached the 57-year-old High Court judge and told him to hand over his wallet. The court heard earlier this week how the top judge “appears to have been kissed on the cheek by the mugger as he fled” with around £140 of Knowles’ cash.

Furthermore, the prosecution stated that Brown, 45, was clutching a bottle of champagne during the mugging, which he had stolen from Lamb Building chambers earlier that same evening. He was charged with one count of burglary in relation to this, alongside one count of robbery.

Giving evidence on Tuesday, Knowles — a former financial law specialist at South Square Chambers — reportedly told the court:

I did the calculation that the best thing for me to do was to produce my wallet rather than arguing or trying to run. I felt under a very real threat that the bottle would be used to hit me and I’m fully aware of how devastating the injury that type of action could cause. I was pretty focused on that danger.

According to legal news website CourtNewsUK (£), a jury of eight women and four men took just three-and-a-half hours to return not guilty verdicts on both counts.

Brown — who wasn’t represented during the trial — apparently told HMP Wandsworth’s prison doctor:

I got up to so much I do not know if it was me or not and it was a long time ago.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek’s careers events, sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub here.


Wallet owner

It’s not Terry’s, it’s mine!


The Bounder



Corbyn. Sympathiser

This is a good post.


Jones Day junior associate

The judge probably let him off because he had a nice smile. Just like Katie.



Whoever you are, I will have you know that this is not funny nor amusing – just sad and creepy. Get a life.


Luke from Chelmsford

I think this was discussed recently. The Jones Day cult is more than just one person. Also – it is amusing.


Corbyn. Sympathiser

This is also a good post.


Terry Browne

Amazing quality stuff from LC. What can have been in the minds of the jury?
What is the ratio decidendi behind this?



The prosecution case was utterly implausible. Champagne? Lamb Building Chambers? Don’t make me laugh. No wonder he was acquitted….



lol at the poor prosecution sap that managed to lose this case.



At least he wasn’t on a CFA


Google digger

The prosecutor was a ‘Michael Williams’. Given his call, it’s possible it was this chap:



Poor devil. He looks a bit stupid over this.



You can only believe that the jury thought this was a case of misidentification.


Ciaran Goggins

Joshua Bonehill is the not man what will be blamed for this.



So Knowles gave evidence in open court on oath that was rejected by a jury. In other words he was not believed. What are the implications for his judicial career?


Comments are closed.