Lord Chief Justice urges public to ‘remember judges are human’ as he reveals sad impact of online threats

By on

Some need counselling over ‘shocking’ case content

Paid a six-figure salary to watch advocates try to impress you seems like a decent job. However, the head of the judiciary of England and Wales has revealed the sad impact online abuse and sensitive cases is having on the profession.

Lord Burnett has revealed that, while he doesn’t believe judges should be free from criticism, the abuse they face is getting out of hand. Judges, unfortunately, “face a torrent of personal abuse for decisions they have made — increasingly online and in social media”. He also said there is “a growing number of cases where judges are threatened and physically abused”, this comment coming days after a litigant was sentenced to 20 weeks for rugby tackling a judge to the floor outside court.

On this abuse, Burnett, who has been the Lord Chief Justice for just two months, continued:

“Some is calculated to intimidate judges individually or collectively. Such abuse is capable of undermining the rule of law. Judicial independence and impartiality is at the heart of the rule of law.”

Public hate and the potential effect this has on the administration of justice has been brought to the fore since the Brexit legal challenge which, fun fact, was in the Supreme Court exactly a year ago today. Judges at almost every stage of the hearing were minded to condemn abuse of those involved, directed at lawyers and claimants alike. High Court judges hearing the case were then labelled ‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’ by the press when they handed down their pro-claimant judgment.

It’s perhaps unsurprising, then, that research from February has revealed judges feel less valued by society than they did two years ago. Less than half (43%) feel valued by the public; the numbers drop staggeringly to 3% and 2% when considering how valued they feel by the media and the government respectively.


This, clearly, has had an impact on the mood among judges, which has been described as poor in various Lord Chief Justice reports. Another factor causing this low morale — which has been cited as a reason for the High Court’s failure to fully staff its benches — is the sometimes harrowing cases judges have to try.

Burnett said “there is some pretty shocking material that comes across our desks which we have to take into account to be able to determine the cases before us”, adding:

“Our judges work incredibly hard making important, often life-changing decisions, day in, day out, in difficult circumstances.”

Indeed, the plight faced by judges when dealing with these is becoming more public.

The latest comments from across Legal Cheek

Mr Justice Dingemans broke down in tears at Bristol Crown Court when sentencing Nathan Matthews to at least 33 years in prison for the murder of his stepsister, Becky Watts. Not long after, Burnett’s predecessor, Lord Thomas, spoke out about harrowing sexual offence cases and the emotional toll that they can have on judges. He said:

“Few people have any idea of the sheer depravity to which people can sink and a judge often has material in front of him which cannot but distress people.”

Burnett said judges have been given counselling to help deal with this. “[W]e are making professional support available to judges who feel that it would assist them,” he explained. “Judges are very self-contained individuals but no one is invulnerable to the effects and materials that they see in the course of their professional lives.”

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub



Try dishing out parking tickets for peanuts.



Parking tickets for peanuts…how about the person that has to pay them peanuts on top of ever-increasing bills and families to feed?? Sympathy much….I doubt it….



With the breadth of society and all its failings that they have an overview of, Judges should be the salt of the earth.

I suspect that the insight into human depravity that Judge Dingemans saw is part and parcel of the harvest that feeds a tranche of the Bristol middle class. Police, psychiatrists, social workers, prison officers, head teachers, solicitors, barristers and the attendant IT experts they all need.

There is the odd one – George Bernard Shaw, Charles Dickens, Gandhi, Annie Besant – who try and change society, once they become aware of its ills, but most continue with their middle class lifestyles.

Trolling is the other side of the middle class coin.

Twas ever thus…

Hang me for fulfilling the evil details of a life without hope in your middle class net, with your ceremonial cap on, and you will get the sort of crowds you deserve. When you do, invest your pension funds and private equity in crowd control measures to secure targeted economic growth.



Did one too many late night bifters lead to this nonsense diatribe?



Nope, years of experience. Are you just going to get in your Audi and drive on by then, with the majority ?



You snivelling fool



Gizza bifter, La!


Me snivelling…? It is the Judges in the article who are getting upset about trolling and offences against their person. My conscience is clear. Is yours ?



My conscience is far from clear. My actions in the past have been irreprehensible. I am a changed man now though. I think.


Ciaran Goggins

There are bent judges just as there are bent plod. Seems they hate being called out on that. Old Bailey delenda est.


Comments are closed.

Related Stories