Junior solicitor struck off for fare dodging just two years after qualifying

By on

Adam Kemeny avoided paying £650 worth of train fares from Shoreditch to Surrey

📸 Redhill station (credit: Google)

A junior lawyer has been struck off for dodging train fares on his morning commute.

Adam Kemeny, who was less than a year into his first job as a newly qualified (NQ) solicitor, was found to have avoided £650 worth of train fares over several months in 2017.

Kemeny was caught by ticket inspectors in October 2017 sneaking out a back gate at Redhill station (pictured top) in Surrey. It turned out that the hapless NQ had dodged fares 64 times in the previous 65 days, travelling from his home in Shoreditch to his firm’s Redhill branch without tapping out at the far end.

The UCL geography graduate had worked as a paralegal for several years after completing a law conversion course and the Legal Practice Course (LPC). Kemeny finally landed a training contract at Thomas Eggar (since merged with Irwin Mitchell) and qualified in 2016, moving to south-east regional outfit Morrisons Solicitors. But all that effort at legal career-building came to nothing: the rookie lawyer’s fare dodging came to light less than a year into the job, and Morrisons promptly sacked him for gross misconduct.

Kemeny told the disciplinary tribunal that his actions were down to “great financial hardship”, as he was unemployed for several months after his training contract ended. But a Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) prosecutor pointed out that Kemeny’s salary was £38,000: more than enough to cover the £17 cost of the daily trip.

The 2019 Firms Most List

Kemeny’s lawyer said that his client was “a very young solicitor indeed” whose misconduct did not relate to his professional practice, describing him as a “broken man”. He had repaid the train company, confessed to his bosses and reported himself to the regulator.

But the panel decided that Kemeny’s conduct “amounted to a failure to act with integrity and failure to behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in him and in the provision of legal services”.

The tribunal also found that the young lawyer had been dishonest, pointing out that “a solicitor had to display honesty whatever his level of experience”. It ordered that Kemeny be struck off and pay costs of £3,000.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub



38k NQ? Sure he wasn’t working at Morrisons supermarket?



No. You’d earn more there.



The article reports his firm is in Redhill. US firms have really warped peoples perceptions of wages outside of London.



I feel sorry for him.

Rail fares are a disgrace.

Jeremy Corbyn will nationalise railways by imposing a windfall tax on city greed!!

70% income taxes!!

We need fare caps and income based tickets!!

And lots of new council housing within the M25!!!



Panicking 1 y PQE solicitor from Penge

I thought rail fares were optional!!!

Now panicking!!!!

Who do I self report to????

I must self destruct my career!!!!



This isn’t the first time, various lawyers and bankers caught at it, and they were earning significantly more than £38k.

Just. Really. Dumb.



Would you report yourself to the regulator? If I was caught with something like this and paid the fine, I’m not sure I would…


The SRAa

Concealment makes it worse and pushes up the costs bill significantly, somehow.



Only if you get caught..



Well thank goodness a GDLer with a degree in geography can leave the profession.

There will be more opportunities for law graduates now!


Daily Hate Mailer

But how much is his house worth?



People who live in Shoreditch are naturally not the brightest lot.



When did your mum move there?



In 2012, when she realised that she could make 400/hr as a prostitute



“finally landed a training contract at Thomas Eggar (since merged with Irwin Mitchell) and qualified in 2016”




Of course you’re a “US FIRM LAD”



eat my choad


Your LSE guy




Hi Dave.


Baron Von Erich

I don’t blame him one little bit. The cost of public transport compared to anywhere else in Europe is an absolute disgrace.



£17 daily commute across (roughly) 260 working days a year comes to £4,420. Take home salary (assuming no pension etc) for £38,000 is £29,220.

Considering the train alone is going to cost the chap over 15% of his salary I think it’s a bit much to suggest he has ‘more than enough’.

I feel sorry for him. A slap on the wrist and paying the fine should be punishment enough. It seems disproportionate to ruin his future over skipped tickets when it appears the motivation was genuinely financial hardship.


Travel Extortion

Well said. The travel costs including rent, bills food and possibly debt is stressful. Do the SDT live in the real world ? I don’t think they should have ruined his years of hard work there’s far more scrupulous characters out there.

I do feel sorry for him, yes what he did was wrong but when under financial pressure it is possible to make decisions we’re not proud of.



“there’s far more scrupulous characters out there.“

I’m sure there are far more scrupulous characters out there…everyone who pays their fare!

Dictionary time!



The illiterate OP didn’t like your admonishment!



Alas, the problem is that thinking like that you put a lot of regulators out of a job.

If you get a client like this , it is a job creation scheme to ask for leave to have a psychiatric report prepared.

You may just miss the career guillotine then.

Poor lad. Hopefully someone will give him a break.

Do not mess with the middle class is a lesson hard learned. Hit the ball low over the net everytime, or they will smash you without compunction.

I wonder if he was replaced with a cheaper paralegal.



I agree the decision to strike him off seems harsh and that train fares are extortionate, however living Shoreditch is also expensive and is very much a lifestyle choice in my view. If you can afford to rent in Shoreditch then you can afford to pay your train fare. That is the long and short of it.



Sad yet very true.



The SDT judgment confirmed he had £10k in his bank account at one point during the period in question and that his current account never went below £4k. Hardly poverty driven.



I earn just shy of £30k a year with the costs you have detailed above. I survive AND pay my train fares. It’s very easily done, no excuses.

And before somebody comments, I am not a qualified lawyer.



One rule for Cherie Blair QC, another for junior Solicitor…



Oooouuu this!!



Cherie Blair is Barrister …. not a solicitor … different rules, different regulatory body!!!




One that allows you, as a 30-something to supply class A drugs to your teenage lover, who dies as a result, you get convicted of manslaughter, and you will STILL not be struck off but merely be suspended for a few years.

Totally different standards for the Bar…



Chemsex Hendron is a living legend you poofta



He didn’t get convicted of manslaughter. It was supply. You idiot.



It’s a dishonesty offence you bunch of dimwits. Naturally he cannot work in the profession anymore.



You’ve clearly never worked in legal practice.



You’ve clearly not been up for SDT. Steal a bloody Freddo and your struck off for dishonesty. And I know that Freddo’s are currently running for £600, but its the principle.


Dickfart LLP trainee

Could I move to a top top Titan firm like Irwin Mitchell or DWF on qualification?



dickfarts sounds like a top outfit



His actions merit a fine and compensation to the train company, but to strike him off? A mile too far in my opinion.


Anon knee mouse

Wait…what kind of shite firm would not even pay your travel expenses?



maybe a final warning but this is a bit too far and harsh. The train is going in that direction anyways 🤷🏽‍♂️ Trains prices are scams these days



I’m slightly staggered at the amount of people who think this is harsh or heavy handed. Surely everyone knows that a proven act of dishonesty leads to strike off, especially if it’s done repeatedly. That’s pretty much what you sign up to when you qualify and it’s hardly a secret. I feel sorry for the guy, he’s made a massive mistake early in his career, but I suspect his ‘error in judgement’ would have continued until he was caught…



Completely agree. This is a straightforward dishonesty offence, and of course the guy had to be struck off. High train fares don’t come into it.



I think such a blanket approach to ‘dishonesty’ offences is ridiculous.

Imagine if the same approach was taken in relation to violent criminal offences. A person found guilty of ABH might as well be locked up for life because it’s pretty much murder right?

The main question is (or should be) “will this guy end up siphoning client cash?” I don’t think anybody can realistically conclude in the positive just because he has dodged train tickets.



I wonder if he bothered paying for his train fare back from the tribunal



Why didn’t he just cadge a ride from Lord Harley on his munchkin steam train?



You’re misguided, every learned friend knows Lord Harley always arrives on his motorbike



You cretin, I always travel in the Roller. Especially when I’m sitting in the Privy Arbital Court.



If I tell my Mrs her jeans don’t make her look chubby do I have to self report?

There’s got to be some level where we acknowledge he’s not been honest but having confessed etc, 60-something days skipped fares are hardly deserving the same punishment as some of the dishonestly out there. Otherwise once you miss one train fare you might as well just really go for it and start lying through your teeth all the time.



Don’t know why you’ve been downvoted. Fair point in my view.

I also think the division between dishonesty offences and other offences is overplayed. Say a lawyer gets done for fare dodging twice in ten years, that might show a very low predisposition to dishonesty yet be a big deal for SRA/BSB.

But another lawyer might get convicted twice in that period for being DUI many times over the limit, which would show grave recklessness, contempt for others’ lives and contempt for the law but wouldn’t attract much of a sanction professionally, if any.


Mohammed Bello

The Code of Conduct for solicitors is clear on requirement that people in the business of delivering legal services must act with integrity at all times. This fellow made a conscious decision – not once, not twice – to flout the rules knowing the implications that could arise out of his action. He owed the public a duty of care and therefore integrity. He chose to ignore this. Clearly, it must have been foreseeable to him that his action could lead to a gross dismissal. Training contracts are hard to come by. And those lucky to have one, shouldn’t make a mockery of it. I am afraid that the SDT’s action was proportionate in the circumstances.


Comments are closed.

Related Stories