News

Struck off lawyer suspended by bar tribunal

By on
14

Aurang Khattak removed from solicitors profession — but return to the bar remains open

A dual-qualified lawyer who was struck off the roll for repeatedly breaching account rules has been suspended by a bar disciplinary tribunal.

The Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service (BTAS) found Aurang Khattak had engaged in conduct, whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise, discreditable to a barrister and likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession.

The bar tribunal’s decision comes after Khattak was struck off the roll in 2012 following repeated breaches of the solicitors’ accounts rules, which fell short of dishonesty, when practising as a supervising solicitor between 2009 and 2012.

The 2020 Legal Cheek Chambers Most List

Khattak, who was called to the bar in 1989 and admitted as a solicitor in 2000, was suspended from applying for a practising certificate for two years and fined £1,000, according to a disciplinary finding published this week. He was also ordered to pay £600 in costs.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) says the misconduct was brought to its attention in 2017.

Commenting on the order, BSB director of legal and enforcement, Sara Jagger said:

“It is a serious matter for a supervising solicitor to allow breaches of the solicitors’ accounting rules to take place and the Disciplinary Tribunal’s decision to prevent Mr Khattak from practising as a barrister for two years reflects this.”

The tribunal’s decision is open to appeal.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

14 Comments

AA

Do you think if you’re struck off from either body, you should be banned from the legal profession entirely?

Anon

No

Anon

TBF, as a Barrister he won’t have the same account rules to follow, so it makes sense that the punishment may be less severe.

Same Anon

Read the finding and he’s also unregistered, query if he was ever going to practice anyway

Anonymous

Wow, no need to be rascist pal, let’s just have a civil conversation, ok?

Not The Same Anon

If you are going to be a fuax-SJW troll, do try at least to learn the word “racist”, pal.

Not The Same Anon

I know it was “faux”, effin typo. Still you can’t call “rascist” a typo, that is pure ignorance.

Anonymous

Sorry mate for the typo, ok? The point still stands though. But you didn’t comment on that.

Anon

First, it was not a typo. You just can’t spell. Second, you made no point other than of the little boy crying wolf variety. Big kisses, mwah.

Anonymous

Sorry that you love racism pal.

Anonymous

Well done, you mastered the first issue. The second is going to be harder work, darling.

Innocent passer-by

What on earth is going on in this thread? LC is here to make people laugh not cringe

Anonymous

Wow, no need to be rascist pal, let’s just have a civil conversation, ok?

Anonymous

Quite right, brother. Hope he apologises.

Join the conversation

Related Stories