Gateley defends awarding training contract to top partner’s niece

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

27

She looks like a decent candidate, but in giving her a TC the firm has exposed the first class graduate to a public backlash

Leading listed law firm Gateley is under fire for awarding a TC to the niece of one of its top partners.

The story emerged earlier today on lawyer message board and website RollOnFriday, which reports that the niece has a first class degree from Nottingham Trent University and has spent the last couple of years as a paralegal at a smaller firm.

The future trainee’s aunt is Victoria Garrad, Gateley’s chief operating officer and an employment law partner. Previously Garrad was the firm’s HR director.

The firm has issued this comment on the matter:

“The candidate is a relation but with regards to the selection process, she came through the application and interview process in the same way as all of our graduate applicants and Victoria was not, at any stage, involved in the reviewing, interviewing or selection process and this was undertaken in the usual way by an independent panel.”

Legal Cheek understands that the candidate exceeded Gateley’s baseline entry requirements, was assessed against the same competencies as all the other external candidates and was then selected entirely on her own merits.

The 2023 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

This isn’t the first time this sort of thing has happened. In recent years Mishcon de Reya and Vardags have both hit the headlines for hiring sons and daughters of top partners.

The offspring all tend to have good CVs and would surely obtain training contracts at firms that they don’t have links to. So you do wonder about the wisdom of them being allowed to go through the recruitment process at firms where members of their family hold senior roles — not least because it carries a high risk of exposing them to a public backlash, as has happened here.

27 Comments

TooOldForThis

Find me a law firm that hasn’t hired a partner’s kid or other close relation… I’ll wait…

anon

“Everyone else does it” isn’t a defence.

_

Feel sorry for the trainee

NQ

But why did they apply to a firm they have relations to in the first place? Seems like a quality candidate and if they pass Gateley’s competencies, they would surely thrive at another firm’s selection process?

X

Who grassed?

It could be me…

No obvious suspect here – could have been –

Anyone who failed to get a TC at Gateley

An unhappy fellow trainee at Gateley

Someone enlightened at Gateley who doesn’t like nepotism

Anyone else who doesn’t like Nepotism

Financial guy

Gateley share price has just plunged 0.63% on the back of this news

Anon

Expensive trainee

Anon

I mean, on the flip side, why should she be discriminated against just because her aunt happens to work there?

Gatekeeper?

Because she chose to apply to exactly where her aunt works. So this is not just a coincidence as you’ve put it, but more of a deliberate choice.

Also because this makes it very difficult to be sure that she was recruited on merit… it’s surely like a company awarding its legal service contract to a client company where the lawyers and client happen to be related… sure, the tender process might be properly papered over and they might have scored well on criteria… but at the end of the day – who can really be certain that the family relationship wasn’t a factor??!

The whole situation should have been avoided by the firm and the trainee.

It's a family affair

“The offspring all tend to have good CVs and would surely obtain training contracts at firms that they don’t have links to.” – they might, but maybe they want to work for the firm they have more knowledge of. Maybe their ‘relative’ speaks highly of the firm and they admire it and want to work there for the culture or whatever.

"News"

This is not news – just look at some MC trainee intakes. It gets talked about within firms and makes everyone uncomfortable. I feel sorry for the future trainee in this instance, she is not a unique case

Heh

The biggest red flag is that she’s a Nottingham Trent grad.

Bizarre

Jesus what an inane non-issue !? Yes she shouldn’t be subject to favours (she want anyway) but equally you can’t hold it against her! What do they want a blanket ban?

Critical thinker

Smell that nasty stench? That’s called presumption. Stop assuming that she was given a TC because of nepotism.

Have a cold

Can’t smell anything.

But I can see that ignoring obvious facts is a strength of yours. Let’s all ignore the issue of nepotism and just assume she got in on merit.

Yeah – we can’t. Because of the situation the firm has created – no one can ever be sure the trainee got in on their own merits.

Starting to smell… a whiff of nepotism.

Critical thinker

“No one can ever be sure the trainee got in on their own merits”. That’s my point. Can you not read? The point is l, you can’t assume either way. I’m not ignoring obvious facts. The facts are very obvious and I can read, but unlike you, I can think critically. I presume you haven’t heard of the logical fallacy called “affirming the consequent”. Look it up.

Grande Battie

Nepo ass comment section. If you’re objectively good enough for Gateley, you’re good enough for a tonne of other firms with zero nepo accusations. Little sympathy here sorry.

Irwin Mitchell 100 PQE

“objectively good enough for Gateley, you’re good enough for a tonne of other firms”.

L comment.

Anonymous

Feel sorry for the grad – it’s not even been confirmed if they’re related

Human Person

Well the Prime Minister and Joe Biden are both my 15th cousins so that’s also rife for nepotism. Mind you this partner and the Trainee are also at least my 15th cousins so maybe I can now make this article all about me actually.

Pratik

If the candidate has been recruited on merit, this must be celebrated and not have a backlash.

Firms need good talent and if employees feel happy encouraging relatives to apply it goes on to show how good the firm is as a place of work.

BA(honz)Nottingham Trent

What’s “Nottingham Trent” ?

Is that a football team?

Heh

Rookie mistake.

What usually happens is partners at city firms do a kids swap for training contract: a partner at one firm will take kid of partner at another firm and that partner will return the favour. Everyone wins. Except meritocracy.

Mastermind World

Don’t understand the fuss given the TC ain’t with a top MC or US firm.

Z

What a silly comment.

Critical thinker

“No one can ever be sure the trainee got in on their own merits”. That’s my point. Can you not read? The point is l, you can’t assume either way. I’m not ignoring obvious facts. The facts are very obvious and I can read, but unlike you, I can think critically. I presume you haven’t heard of the logical fallacy called “affirming the consequent”. Look it up.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Daughter of Mishcon de Reya chief operating officer starts training contract at Mishcon de Reya

It is understood that she has gone through the same recruitment process as other trainees

Oct 19 2018 12:33pm

Law firms, please start rejecting applicants that gain work experience from daddy’s contacts

Then you'll have hard-working trainees who aren’t used to receiving everything on a plate

Jun 6 2016 9:00am

‘Should I work as a paralegal at the firm I’ve secured a training contract with?’

I planned to fill the gap with legal work but the job market is flat so options are limited, writes one Legal Cheek reader

Jun 19 2020 10:10am