Financial Times estimates Slaughter and May profit per equity partner to be £4 million

Avatar photo

By Thomas Connelly on

6

Highest ever figure touted for secretive elite firm

Math lady meme
Elite law firm Slaughter and May is famously tight-lipped about its partners’ earnings.

Still, that hasn’t stopped journalists from speculating. The latest estimate comes courtesy of the Financial Times — and if anyone’s in a position to make an educated guess, it’s them, right?

In an article exploring whether the MC player can withstand growing competition from US firms in the City, the FT estimates profit per equity partner (PEP) to be “pushing” £4 million.

The newspaper doesn’t say how it comes to that figure but does reference revenue and profit figures produced by The Lawyer.

This £4 million sum is particularly noteworthy as it appears to be the highest estimate published to date. Legal Cheek and The Times estimate the firm’s PEP at around £3.5 million, while last year, Law.com placed it closer to £2.5 million.

The FT explains that the firm avoids disclosing partner pay by choosing to operate as a general partnership rather than the more common limited liability partnership (LLP)

But Slaughters isn’t the only elite law firm trying to keep its finances on the down low.

APPLY NOW: The Legal Cheek Winter Virtual Vacation Scheme, run in partnership with The University of Law, starts this coming Monday

Last summer, Freshfields announced it would no longer share a detailed breakdown of its financial performance — including PEP — with journalists, though some figures remain accessible through Companies House. Instead, the firm claimed the “real sign” of its progress lies in the “quality” of its business and “client mandates”.

Among the rest of the Magic Circle, Clifford Chance reported a PEP of £2.04 million earlier this year, while Allen & Overy recorded £2.2 million ahead of its merger with Shearman & Sterling. Meanwhile, Linklaters posted a PEP of £1.9 million.

While Slaughter and May may seem to lead the Magic Circle in partner profits, it’s important to note that partners at elite US firms in London can command even larger sums. The Legal Cheek Firms Most List shows PEP at Kirkland & Ellis comes in at a staggering £6.1 million, while their counterparts at Paul Weiss earn an equally impressive £5.1 million.

6 Comments

Commentator

Profit built on the blood, sweat, and tears of their juniors.

Idiot

FT: “Average profits per partner are estimated to be pushing £4mn.”

Legal Cheek editor: “I don’t understand what pushing means!”

anon

Does anyone know what % of partners will earn £4m? FT says the junior ones make £1.5m.

Anon

I think you’ll find there’s good reason for PEP being kept secret. They’re the last to increase salaries, and when they do, they barely keep up with their competitors (and that’s being kind). It smacks of pay increases being a chore they do begrudgingly. I should imagine they’d be many unhappy staff there, if the partners were to go around advertising their US-firm-matching PEP.

Chris

An absolutely incredible firm. Lawyers with brains the size of planets

Leopard

The £4m figure is very hard to believe given their hourly rates are often lower than other MC, their associate pay is so much lower than all their competitors and they only do £650m in revenue with 110 partners (so £5.9m revenue per equity partner, about the same as Clifford Chance).

Those figures don’t stack up when you compare to US firms with £4m PEP. They also don’t have many US clients which is where the really big fees come from. The impoverished FTSE 100 is not a great hunting ground from juicy fee arrangements.

Others have estimated Slaughter’s PEP to be about £2.9m, which is more likely. That is a little bit higher than CC/Freshfields at around £2.2m, which you can explain by Slaughter’s much smaller international footprint/practice area range.

My experience working with them is they do generally have smart people (very Oxbridge heavy and polished presentation/writing style) but have a tendency towards pedantry and impracticality. They will kid themselves into thinking they are being cleverer than everyone else, but when you compare their advice to top QCs/KCs, whose brains really are galactic, you immediately see the difference.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

business man looking ้his shadow rich under money rain success concept vector

Law’s high rollers: The firms turning their top lawyers into multi-millionaires

A rundown of the impressive partner profits at the country’s leading outfits

Nov 20 2024 8:46am
10

Magic circle vs US MoneyLaw: An associate’s perspective

One City lawyer sets out some of the factors they took into consideration before making the switch 🇬🇧 ➡️ 🇺🇸

Jul 22 2021 8:00am