Judge given formal warning over sex in judicial chambers

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

19

Incident occurred 15 years ago


A judge has received a formal warning after admitting to having sex in his judicial chambers over 15 years ago.

Recorder Paul Kirtley admitted the encounter, with his then partner, had taken place as alleged and accepted that his conduct was inappropriate. He expressed shame and offered his “unreserved apologies”, according to the public disciplinary statement.

The Guide to Judicial Conduct requires judicial office holders to ensure their behaviour, both in and out of court, maintains public confidence in their impartiality and avoids situations which might undermine respect for the judiciary.

A complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) alleged that Kirtley had “engaged in sexual intercourse with the complainant”, his then partner, in his chambers while they were in a relationship.

An investigation was carried out following the grant of an extension of time due to exceptional circumstances. A nominated judge found that Kirtley’s behaviour amounted to misconduct.

The judge noted in mitigation that the incident was a one-off, consensual encounter that occurred over 15 years ago, but concluded that engaging in such activity in judicial chambers risked reducing respect for judicial office. They recommended that Kirtley receive a formal warning.

The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor accepted the recommendation and issued the warning.

19 Comments

Sexy Judges

The leniency of the JCIO is astounding.

Alex

Hell hath no fury, that’s for sure

Lord Denning

Legend

Anonymous

Good lad

Terrence Wang

“The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor accepted the recommendation and issued the warning….”

… alongside a hearty slap on the back and a little wink to the absolute mad lad who received it.

All Rise

FFS. 15 years ago? Actually, come to think of it, I really don’t care if a judge has sex in chambers today.

What’s the problem? I’m sure he locked the door.

Go mate. 👍

Anon

The misconduct here would appear to be poor judgment in the choice of sexual partners…

Anonymous

Absolute mad lad

Cymru Am Byth

A very stiff warning no doubt

Archibald O'Pomposity

Something for counsel to keep in their back pocket (like Judge Kirtley did) if ever they need a handy quip to ease tensions in court.

Porky McPorkface

So… ex-partner (a willing participant) went and snitched on him after all these years?

Chinedu

Like a wise person said an age ago, hell hath no fury …

Whyy

These types of scorned lover allegations that didn’t affect anyone should really be ignored. Especially if from 15 years ago.

Bad Boiz Bad Boiz…

I suspect the smacked bottom penalty was because he was honest about it.

They wouldn’t have been so lenient if he had denied it and had been found to have done it.

David

It’s the JCIO’s pathetic window-dressing charades that bring the justice system into disrepute whilst the real judicial misdemeanors go unchallenged.

Justice Prevails

It baffles me that this was reported 15 years later. The Judge should have marked the act as “Private and Confidential”

Rock Soff

Absolutely no one will 1) care, or 2) be surprised.

Chinedu

Like a wise person said an age ago, hell hath no fury …

A. N. Other KC

I wish I had had the brief for the disciplinary hearing.

Join the conversation