Law firms told to ditch ‘Dear Sirs’

Avatar photo

By Julia Szaniszlo on

54

New Law Society guidance


The Law Society has issued new diversity and inclusion guidance urging law firms to ditch “Dear Sirs”, a standard legal greeting dating back to a time when the profession was predominantly male.

The guidance stresses that the phrase no longer reflects the reality of the legal profession, explaining that the Society wants to “account for and represent the broad scope of recipients, including women and individuals with other gender identities, including non-binary”.

“This gendered greeting perpetuates the assumption that the recipients of correspondence are by default men,” the Society says.

The 2026 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

“Dear Sirs” has traditionally been used when the recipient’s name is unknown. The Law Society has now published a list of alternative greetings that avoid gendered language.

When unsure of the recipient’s name, organisations are encouraged to use neutral phrases such as “Dear team”, “good morning/afternoon”, or “Dear all”. Other alternatives include addressing the recipient using their role (“Dear managing partner”) or the more formal “To whom it may concern”.

These alternatives, the Law Society says, “maintain professionalism while ensuring your communication is respective of all gender identities”.

Although the guidance was only released this month, Legal Cheek previously reported that several firms — including Freshfields, Clifford Chance, Withers and Quinn Emanuel — had already gone public with their decisions to remove gendered language from their communications.

54 Comments

Anti-DEI Partner

Nah, you’re alright.

Modern Solicitor

Edgy

James

I consider myself right wing, and I disagree with “Dear Sirs”. It has nothing to do with pandering and everything to do with modern practice.

John

You have been socially engineered

Learned Friend

It’s embarrassing for a partner to be unwilling to add a few extra characters and simply write ‘Dear Sir or Madam’ instead of ‘Dear Sirs’. What a snowflake.

Victoria

How annoying

BdaPara

I dont know about the other gender labels, but it is a great idea as it includes females.

Ling time coming, I never liked the blanket Dear Sirs. Good call Law Society

John

“Dear Sir/Madam,”

Has been around for ages, covers both genders that exist

Eloise

But John, it´s rarely used in this context. Almost always the default is to Sirs…

Dear Sirs

This sort of nonsense is why Farage will be PM. As the “alternatives” show, there is no decent alternative. English takes the masculine form when addressing a mixed gender group. It’s grammar not prejudice.

Robin Humphrey

He won’t be PM unless PM means prat-monkey

Eloise

In which grammar textbook does it say that it´s grammatically correct? Sir means a man in a position of authority, so it isn´t accurate. Language evolves all the time, as does the law. This is fossilised and inappropriate, and when it may once have been grammatically correct, this was also at a time when women could not vote, let alone be lawyers. The clinging onto tradition without a solid and robust argument in favour of keeping Sirs is baffling to almost everyone other than those within the law. And even then, the Magic Circle law firms, amongst many others, ditched it a while back. Only the remaining SMEs fear the change, and I honestly don´t know why.

Female salary partner

Woke piffle. No thanks.

Tim Burr

Well put…more woke bollocks

Progressive Polly

I always start my letters:

Dear Sir/ Madam/ both/ neither/ Zir/ Zadm/ Zing/ Zem/ Fish/ Banana/ Coconut/ Kitty/ Kittiwake/ Zebra/ Concept/ Mineral/ Other (please state)

That way no one gets offended.

dEAr sIrs

Suggest “Dear all” as more pithy and non-denominational, unless your point is to be intentionally obtuse and inconsiderate for no other reason than to be intentionally obtuse and inconsiderate?

Pomme Puss

I’m so glad that you find Single Lens Reflex cameras endearing.

Passive Voice

“Dear all” sounds awful when addressed to a third party business when the specific recipient(s) is not known. “Dear Sirs” works perfectly well then.

Mr Lizardman

I’m not shocked, I’m just disappointed.

Nice one mate

top bants mate, da wrld iz 2 woke now amirite???

Zingi

I self-identify as a Zinger Tower Burger.

How do you propose to accommodate my needs, please?

RND

What’s wrong with sir or madam? Only 9 extra characters … just saying.

Lairg

What if they don’t identity as a sir or madam, what if they’re an itty bitty UWU.

Stop assuming binary gender.

Mx B

Tell that to the Supreme Court!

I pity the fools

How ignorant a comment is that? Shows the poster has no concept of what the decision in For Women Scotland was about and how the court reached its conclusion.

Anonymity

Dear reader ,
Some folk need to get out more often.
Or need more debt.

Dave

Well, lawyers always call their opponents “my learned friend”, and proceed in their arguments to show how unlearned their opponents really are. I agree. Let’s do away with “Dear Sirs” and let’s just refer to them as “Dear Unlearned friends”.

Boaty McBoatface

I am a ship. People keep referring to me as a female. She did this and she did that.

They say that, like all ships, I’m female. But I don’t feel female and I want people to recognise that. Can’t we start calling me “they/ them”.

This ship language needs updating. Otherwise ships will start striking in their droves. And you’ll have a lot of ships taking up valuable hospital beds in very ill health.

Oh and please stop calling me Loretta, Stan.

Jim

I was taught (20+ years ago) that the correct way was only ever “to whom it may concern” when addressing a letter to persons unknown. I recall being specifically told that dear sirs was entirely unacceptable. That was common sense back then. Today, Farage’s brigade would have you believe this is some new, crazy idea. It is not – it is plain English decency and manners, and has been around for years.

Lucy

This is a great move, much welcomed. As a non-practising solicitor who left the profession due to misogyny and homophobia (and I identify as gender queer using they/them pronouns), this change couldn’t come soon enough. It really does matter, and to suggest otherwise only highlights your ignorance of your colleagues within the profession. In my case it’s too little too late, but I hope that this catalyzes change that makes the profession more inclusive and accessible to more than white cis-het able bodies.

Eyes roll

Sadly, there is a fair chance that this self-pitying rant is not a parody. And it is “catalyses”, this is England.

Ziggy

I don’t even identify as human, though I was assigned human at birth.

How should I be addressed?

Gilly

Are you a cat from Japan?

Ziggy

No, I’m a Zebra from Croydon.

And before anyone says I’m a stripy horse, I want you all to know how ignorant and upsetting that is!

Free speech absolutist horse

You are just a stripy horse. And one that misses pop culture references at that.

Ziggy

And no I don’t play the bloody guitar!

People keep asking me if I play guitar!

Now I’ve had my species-affirming surgery I have hooves!

Do I look like I play guitar????

curious future trainee

what are your preferred adjectives?

Ziggy

Gnim/gnee

Eloise

You only need to read Harriet Harman´s report into sexual harassment at the Bar to know that your experience is real, Lucy. Dear Sirs, to me, it is symbolic in its sexism, and so to do away with it is quite right.

Margaret

😆 🤣 😂

Brian, age 10

You can avoid this altogether but starting letters with

“To whom it’s about to concern”

OB

Wow the article and the comments on this are insane. I’m sorry can’t you acknowledge the gender of 50% of the planet. I’ve been the receiving end of this a couple of times in engineering. It did NOT make me excited to work with those colleagues at all. How does this still happen in 2025. I’m not asking you to pander to the minority here just the other half of the planet…

Won-KenOB

At your age, assuming you are of working age, women are the minority. It’s that old 1.05/1.00 birth ratio.

Dyche

Utter woke nonsense

J

Most decent firms made this change years ago. Not sure why it’s controversial.

Jonathan Carroll

We did this 4 or 5 years ago. Nobody batted an eyelid.

Abbie

Utter nonsense. Dear Sirs is simply formal, and usually used when you have no idea who the specific reader will be. It’s never offended me and I’m not male. I suspect those that open my correspondence don’t care either. Thankfully I’ll be retired in about 10 years and won’t need to care anymore.

Dear Sirs

Exactly. English uses the masculine form for mixed groups or an individual of unknown gender. It grammar not discrimination.

Scouser of Counsel

I’ve always thought that “Dear friends,” has a nice conciliatory ring to it!

Litigator

A lateral used “Dear Sir / Madam” in a draft letter and he didn’t pass probation.

The point is that “Dear Sirs” is, in my view, the only acceptable legal greeting when the gender of the addressee is unknown. Just like there are more male partners / silks in the legal profession.

Anonymouse

Please no, anything but change!!!!!

Robert A Harrison

The rules of statutory interpretation are simple.

If a statute refers to ” he ” it also means ” she “.

It really is as simple as that.

No need for the woke brigade to be involved in any way.

W

in which case “The House of Lords” might be due a bit of a rebrand …

Carole

And what’s with the “Dear”? If you don’t know who I am, then you should not be addressing me as “Dear,” whether I am male, female, or any of the labels mentioned above. Am I to assume that you love or care about me? If you don’t know me, then probably not.
“To Whom It May Concern” has no affection nor a label.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Withers latest to drop ‘Dear Sirs’ in emails

Reminds staff to use 'gender neutral' salutations instead

Jan 28 2022 11:49am

Law Society condemns Trump’s attack on lawyers as top firms quietly remove DEI content from their websites

Hogan Lovells and Latham & Watkins among those to make online tweaks

Mar 19 2025 3:08pm
11

Quinn Emanuel follows Freshfields in ditching ‘Dear Sirs’ from lawyers’ emails

'The idea is to show that we take gender seriously', says US firm

Feb 17 2020 10:53am