BPP, ULaw, Oxford and KCL embrace AI training in new deal with US tech giant Harvey

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

4

Plug tech directly into teaching and legal research


Four of the UK’s biggest legal education players — BPP, The University of Law, Oxford University and King’s College London — have teamed up with US tech giant Harvey to bring its AI tools and training into their law courses.

The partnership brings Harvey’s generative AI tools and teaching materials into classrooms, research centres and professional training courses, marking the company’s first formal move into the UK university market after rapid adoption across more than 25 top US law schools.

Harvey builds AI tools for the legal sector, helping lawyers with everyday tasks like contract reviews, due diligence and compliance checks. Its technology is already used by a number of major City firms (including A&O Shearman and Macfarlanes) as well as global businesses looking to speed up their in-house legal work. Backed by big-name investors such as Sequoia and the OpenAI Startup Fund, Harvey has quickly become one of the most recognisable AI providers in the City.

Oxford Uni pointed to the academic benefits of the deal, with Dean John Armour explaining:

“Generative AI is transforming the legal sector. By making generative AI tools available to our faculty members, we empower them to experiment with applying these tools in their research. Through this, we are learning about the capabilities of AI tools and reflecting on the ethics and utility of their deployment in research and for pedagogy.”

The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

ULaw and BPP — which train most of the country’s future lawyers — will use Harvey’s platform in their day-to-day teaching. BPP plans to fold the tech into training for aspiring lawyers, giving students early access to tools already used by Magic Circle and global firms. ULaw is expected to use Harvey to help prepare students for real practice, meaning many SQE candidates could be working with the software long before they start in an office.

At King’s College London, Harvey will slot into the law school’s wider AI skills push, with plans for student workshops, course embeds and joint projects on how AI fits into modern legal work. Professor Dan Hunter said: “Harvey is helping us give every one of our students and staff the opportunity to engage directly with the technologies transforming legal practice, and is a core part of the school’s AI literacy programme.”

Harvey described the UK expansion as an obvious next step. Chief business officer John Haddock said: “The UK’s law schools have a rich history of shaping global legal practice, and their embrace of AI in education sets an exciting precedent for the profession worldwide.”

4 Comments

BPP student

BPP should spend its time and money upgrading its learning materials and bank of MCQs, both of which are deficient.

Cat James

BARBRI is the way forward

Anonymous PGDL student

No thanks.

The effect of AI in the workplace is completely different to its use in education:

A lawyer’s role (distilled to its fundamentals) is to create an end product for a client: whether a contract, due diligence report, client letter, or piece of legal analysis. GenAI is obviously hugely helpful for this, saving lawyers time and clients costs.

As a student, however, our purpose is not to produce an end product, but to learn the knowledge, skills, and behaviours that are required to make that end product. We learn by doing. Everyone knows an LLM can churn out a broadly-passable answer to an essay or problem question, so the real question is: can I? It’s the process of writing that answer that counts, as opposed to the mere endpoint of having it on your computer screen. Education is not business (though for-profit universities such as ULaw and BPP may beg to differ…) – taking shortcuts is not a good thing.

It’s all very well to draft a contract with Harvey when you’re a 10+PQE solicitor who knows how to do it yourself; it’s a different thing altogether to do so simply because that’s the only way you’ve ever learnt.

This move seems short-sighted on ULaw’s part, and I hope that the firms paying them vast amounts of money to educate their future trainees will understand this mistake. GenAI *is* “transforming the legal sector”, but it is naive to assume that any such “transformation” of legal education will be anything but detrimental to the careers of future lawyers whose educators are encouraging them to outsource their thinking to private equity.

LLMs are only getting more powerful. If today’s legal educators are incorporating GenAI from the outset of our legal training, then tomorrow’s lawyers won’t be able to advise, analyse, or draft without GenAI.

And if we can’t draft without AI, how can we possibly draft better than it?

Trump

I agree: AI can be a powerful productivity tool for experienced professionals, but education serves a fundamentally different purpose — to develop independent thinking, judgment, and skill through practice. If learners rely on AI before they’ve mastered the underlying craft, they risk bypassing the very processes that build expertise, leaving them dependent on tools they don’t yet understand well enough to challenge, improve, or surpass. Used too early or too loosely, AI doesn’t accelerate learning — it hollows it out.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

AI beats lawyers at legal research, study finds 

But humans continue to outperform when issues require deeper nuance

Oct 22 2025 8:15am
8