Ex-Linklaters and Akin lawyer charges students £300 for interview advice

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

20

Ross Macgregor defends new business venture


A former City lawyer has left the cut and thrust of corporate law to market interview coaching to students at £300 per session.

The offering from former Linklaters and Akin lawyer Ross Macgregor comes alongside several social mobility organisations offering similar support services for free in an effort to promote and widen access to the legal profession. See Aspiring Solicitors, The 93% Club and SEO London, among others.

Macgregor, who served as a trainee supervisor at Linklaters, opens his pitch by telling students that he has interviewed dozens of training contract hopefuls and has been in the room when decisions are made about “who gets an offer, and who narrowly misses out.”

“I know exactly what you need to demonstrate at interview to show you’ll be a great trainee,” he continues. “I know exactly why brilliant candidates fail at the final hurdle, and how you can instead leave your interviewers impressed.”

The £300 sessions last 75 minutes, during which Macgregor says he will “grill” would-be lawyers as part of a “realistic simulation of a hybrid competency & commercial interview”, before providing “actionable advice on your answers, delivery, and body language”.

The lawyer says he has recently left the City to “pursue business ventures” and, after delivering the sessions, will “travel abroad next month”.

While many of Macgregor’s LinkedIn connections seem to have welcomed his venture, some students have questioned whether it is appropriate to charge for such advice.

One aspiring lawyer Legal Cheek spoke with said it seemed unfair to charge for what appears to be “insider” information. They said:

“The average student cannot afford a £300 ‘intensive’ masterclass for what may be the most important interview of their life. Those who can afford it gain a further, paid-for edge in a profession that already struggles badly with social mobility.”

Echoing these concerns, another training contract seeker accused the former lawyer of seeking to “capitalise off of the stress that prospective applicants are feeling”, adding that the £300 fee is “not only ludicrous but it also limits these supposedly useful sessions to those who already enjoy relatively financially advantageous positions”.

Unperturbed, Macgregor played down the criticism, suggesting it came from “a very small minority”. He told Legal Cheek that “if £300 is what helps you secure a £150k+ NQ job, that is a literal bargain.”

He added: “If you are preparing for the most important hour of your career … why would you cheap out on the prep?” It makes no sense to drop £400 on a new suit to look the part, but refuse to spend £300 to ensure you actually sound the part.”

Macgregor also rejected claims that he was exploiting applicants’ anxiety or selling privileged information. “I’m not capitalising on stress; I’m offering a solution to it,” he told us. “I am taking that ‘secret curriculum’ and selling it on the open market. A service you can save up for is inherently fairer than a bloodline you have to be born into.”

Addressing the fact that social mobility organisations offer similar services for free, Macgregor said: “Free schemes rely on volunteers and waiting lists. If you have an interview on Tuesday, you cannot wait for a match. You need an expert now. An emergency plumber comes with a call-out charge, but you don’t complain about the price when your bathroom is flooding.”

Finally, he said that “for those who truly cannot pay, I offer discretionary discounts — because I want talent to rise, regardless of background”.

Akin and Linklaters declined to comment.

The 2026 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

20 Comments

Anonymous

New wave of capitalism beyond my comprehension just dropped.
This sounds like one of them Youtube ‘self help’ ads.

Average Green Party voter

An individual providing a paid coaching service to willing buyers who want to buy the service is a “new wave of capitalism” now? LOL

Have you ever heard of, for example, personal trainers? You can see those capitalists at your local gym exploiting the needs of people who want/need to get healthy.

No, but seriously, I really don’t see why this should even be news. Especially since, as pointed out, there are plenty of free alternatives available. If this guy just took the students’ money and provided a rubbish service with zero effort, then I would get it. But surely some dude charging for a service they provide is hardly that interesting. What next, go after uni lecturers who provide tutoring in exchange for money, or SQE coaches? At the end of the day, IMO this guy is unlikely to provide you with anything groundbreaking compared to what your uni career service would, but surely a grown-up (yes, even a uni student who’s supposed to have spent years now developing their critical thinking skills) can be expected to make a decision on whether this guy’s specific background is worth an extra £300 without it automatically being “exploitation”.

Matt

if he had started with this I might have felt less annoyed at him

“Finally, he said that “for those who truly cannot pay, I offer discretionary discounts — because I want talent to rise, regardless of background”.”

but he didn’t so, I don’t.

Anonymous

Go to your uni careers team instead! They helped me excel – for free. Well, packaged with the price of the prep course, but with the bonus of at least 3 different expert opinions and lots of opportunities to practice the skills.

LawChic

£400 on a suit? For an interview? What planet is he on? M&S do excellent men’s suits. As do eBay (I got a gorgeous £14 Prada women’s suit a few years ago).

With this context it’s clear he has his own welfare in mind rather than that of anyone he might be able to help.

Saras

Is he talking about sharing insider knowledge from the Magic Circle firms, the International Elite Corporate structures, the institutional inhouse legal departments, High Street law firms, law firms doing legal aid or Banking law firms with securitisations and how to cover up contruct toxic debts, wonder which part of law he teaches, criminal or civil?

Que Saras?

Are you talking about constructing toxic debts or covering them up? They are different departments.

Ifyoudontlikeit

A good father should have provided at least one high end bespoke suit to their children by the time they are at this stage. One can obtain a lower tier one for a few thousand if one is being cheap, but it is always so much better to use the family tailor.

Anon

To be honest, I don’t see the issue – lots of providers give interview advice, and many are paid (think TCLA, etc).

While I personally think £300 is a lot of money and I would struggle to justify paying it when there are free alternatives such as uni careers people etc, if people are willing to pay that amount then I don’t see why he shouldn’t be able to charge it. He is providing a legitimate service in the same way that people hire tutors if they are struggling with a particular subject at school or if they want to learn a new language.

I also think the argument re social mobility providers giving it for free is flawed as not everyone is eligible for them. I think what they do is great, but that shouldn’t stop someone not eligible for social mobility initiatives but also without a nepo ‘backdoor’ in from paying for support. By way of analogy, just because charities provide for people in need, that doesn’t mean that shops shouldn’t be able to charge for their products.

Regarding the point on insider information, I do understand concerns there and I suppose it really depends on what he is providing. If he were to be selling a backdoor into the firms he worked for by providing things that give an unfair advantage (i.e the interview questions they ask etc) then that would be completely wrong. OTOH, if its just application advice based on his experience being a successful applicant/ being involved in recruitment, I don’t see an issue with that: that merely makes him more qualified to provide the advice.

Anonymous

There are similar businesses for Oxford and Cambridge interviews, so what’s wrong with it? Where there’s demand, people will supply services. If it genuinely helps people secure TCs, which, as he rightfully says, secure £150k+, I don’t see a problem with what he’s doing.

Also, it’s ridiculous to say it’s preying on people’s stress. If a business provides a solution you’re struggling with, is that preying on you or helping you? Paying for private tutoring helps stressed, struggling kids and parents reach their goals. Does that make it inherently unfair, or are parents generally happy with their investment if it brings results?

Yes, he may charge a lot. But if you think his services are too expensive, simply don’t pay for them.

J

The irony of his comment are not lost on me. Spend £400  suit then why not spend another £300! I could barely afford my £20 train for last vac scheme interview.

Talk about out of touch.

So

Some eat a Gordon Ramsay, some at McDonalds. It is not out of touch, it is simply knowing there is a market and offering services to it. The fact you may not be on the demand side of that market is neither here nor there.

Archibald O'Pomposity

That Macgregor has an answer for everything!

Shame on LC

I really despise this form of journalism.

I don’t get the problem, and this isn’t news. So he is trying to monetise his unique knowledge and experience, so what?

This politics of envy really has to stop. There will be people out there who want to pay for this service, others will not. And that’s fine, we live in a free market economy where individuals are increasingly monetising their skills.

There are plenty of free resources out there also, so take your pick for what works for you.

I think it’s a real shame to drag this guy’s name in the mud just because he is trying to build something for him.

Archibald O'Pomposity

Completely agree. Interview advice is available from a range of sources, many free. Charging for tuition is not a sin. If he’s not scamming people, as he clearly isn’t, he should be free to charge for his knowledge without being panned on a website for legal sophomores.

Ross was my supervisor

He was genuine and kind and treated me like a human being, which is more that can be said for some of the other partners/people at Akin.

Not sure why we are shitting on others for simply trying to make a living.

Lawyer with some common sense

What a load of nonsense from LC! It’s not like the man is selling drugs at the local primary school. Let’s not be taking ethics lessons from aspiring corporate lawyers…

Alan

God forbid someone try to make money. Doesn’t take much for the lefties to get their pitchforks out.

hear hear

Good on him

———

The suit cost comparison to justify his costs shows how out of touch he is.

Those relying on the bank of mum and dad might be able to drop £400 on a suit and £300 on a mock interview, and clearly that’s the market he is aiming for. He’ll probably have enough ex-clients kids coming his way. But for the majority of people aiming for this career, they will struggle to find this type of money.

At least with a suit you’d get value from for many months/years. You’ll know whether it fits by trying it on before you buy, and you can always get a refund if it doesn’t suit you/you don’t need it. The same won’t be said of such mock interviews which could easily be £300 down the drain, especially given they will only really provide value for Akin’s recruitment process given his experience.

If he’s off on an extended holiday too, it’s not like he’s going to be around for follow up support either.

Join the conversation

Related Stories