Law student drops legal action over Birmingham bin strikes

Avatar photo

By Sophie Dillon on

14

Open University student withdraws case after receiving written assurances from the union about adherence to picketing rules


A Birmingham law student came within hours of facing one of the UK’s largest unions in court over the ongoing bin workers’ strike, which has left the city strewn with rubbish.

Mr R. Heart, 34, threatened Unite the Union with a high court injunction in a bid to stop striking bin workers from blocking lorries at depots across the city, including the Atlas site in Tyseley. He claimed their picket line tactics during the ongoing all-out strike were unlawful and posed a risk to public health.

A first-year Open University law student, Heart said he was driven by a belief that the actions of striking workers — including allegedly circling in roads and obstructing access — went beyond what is permitted under picketing laws. “The behaviour I was witnessing… couldn’t possibly be right or lawful,” the student told Legal Cheek.

The case was due to be heard at Birmingham Civil and Family Justice Centre on Thursday 10 April, but was withdrawn following written confirmation from Unite that the union would continue to follow legal requirements around picketing.

Despite apparently facing the possibility of a hefty costs order, Heart pressed ahead with his application, which centred on alleged breaches of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and the 2024 Code of Practice on Picketing. He was ultimately seeking an injunction with a penal notice to stop strikers from obstructing the highway or delaying council refuse services.

Unite has strongly denied any wrongdoing. A spokesperson for the union told Legal Cheek:

“No case has been settled out of court. The application was withdrawn after Unite reiterated that it always abides by the law and liaises with police to hold peaceful picket lines. This is true for every strike.”

Heart, who has previously mounted legal challenges against public authorities, said he acted after witnessing the impact of more than 17,000 tonnes of uncollected waste piling up across the city. He described the situation as “untenable”.

Now pursuing a legal career with hopes of becoming a barrister, Heart said that he is particularly interested in cases that “make a difference to the lives of people”, especially those involving public accountability.

Meanwhile, Birmingham City Council has made a new offer to its striking refuse workers, raising hopes of a resolution to the dispute.

14 Comments

Rostam

All bin men involved in strikes, blocking lorries, and making false bookings at recycling centres should be sacked. The union, which is part of the problem, should be held liable for criminal charges for allowing a bin worker to reject the offer, as the union is trying to promote itself.”

Dr. Pedant

The strike action has been going on almost long enough where it ceases to be a protected strike, and thus dismissal of striking workers is no longer automatically unfair (though may still be unfair considering other circumstances). So you may get your wish.

Binderella

*Bin people.

There. Fixed that for you.

Anon

Is that you Heart

Mark

Sack them all

Michael Holt

To think, this legal challenge was made in the city of Birmingham which has, as part of its rich history one of the greatest demonstrations of working class solidarity ever at Satley Gate, is very sad indeed.. On that day literally thousands of every day workers, from engineers, to drivers, and manual workers of kinds, peacefully marched on the Saltley depot in such numbers that Saltley had to close and a national dispute was won. The likely reality is, that this type of presnent day challenge by an individual, legal or otherwise, has not materially changed the course or outcome of the Birmingham bin dispute in anyway. Whereas collective solidarity often does and can.

Archibald O'Pomposity

Cool story, bro

Deborah M.

Sack them and those placing themselves on a pedastle will become bin workers will they?

Who you gonna call.....strike busters !

For once the Council is getting it right by issuing redundancy notices .How ironic that a labour council is fighting the Government’s paymasters

R

The council needs to pay their workers. The council is also responsible for scheduling pick ups for the vulnerable and then not going through with it and swallowing people’s money. Stop using our tax money for your own gain and using it to fund genocide and not picking up for the community. The MP is also responsible for the community. You get paid for what? Clear our streets or pay your staff. Simple.

Query?

Lots of rubbish all over the place?
Fire hazards come to mind.

Archibald O'Pomposity

Excellent point. Why not mosey on out there with your clipboard and undertake a risk assessment?

Al ali

Give us our council tax back. We are paying g for a service that’s not being delivered.

Jay

Unite needs disintegrating. The amount of economic damage their management causes by forcing strikes for the sake of a few extra pounds in their pockets is absolutely ridiculous. To top ot off, their logic never has any common sense.

They’re striking against a bankrupt council. How exactly do they expect the council to meet their demands?

The council have already made multiple (imo generous) offers, despite having no budget.

Keep in mind that this is the same union that likes to strike against companies that are losing money and try to reduce their workforce a bit in order to maintain the majority of it. A union that would rather bankrupt an entire company with strikes instead of being reasonable. They’ve caused more job losses than most cuts combined if you include all the closures and bankrupies caused by strikes…

Join the conversation