Barrister who appeared at two criminal trials at the same time is disbarred

Avatar photo

By Julia Szaniszlo on

4

Misled court

Courtroom door
A barrister has been disbarred after acting dishonestly in relation to two criminal trials in Nottingham and Stafford.

Saleema Mahmood, called to the bar in 1999, was granted permission by the court to attend the Nottingham trial remotely so she could be near her ill mother. However, it later emerged that Mahmood had not informed the court that she was also appearing in another trial in Stafford at the same time.

NEW: The 2026 Legal Cheek Chambers Most List

The tribunal found that Mahmood — who admitted the allegations during the hearing — had acted “dishonestly and failed to act with integrity,” according to a statement published by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). It concluded that the appropriate sanction was disbarment.

The tribunal also ordered that Ms Mahmood’s practising certificate be suspended with immediate effect.

Commenting on the decision, a BSB said:

“The public and the profession must be able to have confidence that barristers act with honesty, this being particularly the case in relation to professional commitments. The tribunal’s decision to disbar Ms Mahmood reflects the seriousness of this misconduct and the importance of maintaining trust and confidence in the profession.”

The tribunal’s decision remains open to appeal.

4 Comments

Not a Barrister

So then it begs the question. If she had said, “I got another trial its remote as well but the distance between A and B is too far, so you cool with me going remote?” would that have worked?

While she shouldn’t have lied, but thats an extreme punishment for someone who may or may not be overwhelmed and taking on too much work.

feasel

Disbarrment is the default sanction for lying to the court.

How could it not be? The whole point of having specialist advocates is so the court can rely on what they are saying.

Barristers have a duty to properly manage their practices. This includes a duty to make all reasonable efforts to avoid a clash of hearing dates.

Where, despite making all reasonable efforts, a clash occurs, there is published guidance on deciding which to attend and what to do about the other(s). It is neither complicated nor particularly onerous.

Banjo

I was really hoping this was someone appearing in two physical courts and putting on a moustache, glasses and nose humorously running between two hearings…

An Barrister

It’s not what was done, but the dishonesty that’s the issue.

You can muck up pretty badly at the Bar and still survive as long as you are honest about it.

Integrity is everything at the Bar.

Join the conversation