Captain Picard sets course for another Brexit referendum

By on

Actor and meme sensation Patrick Stewart says that the characters he played would be Remainers

Veteran actor Sir Patrick Stewart is campaigning for a referendum on Theresa May’s Brexit deal, saying that he wants voters to be given a chance to reject the impending divorce arrangements and stay in the EU — as the captain of the Enterprise would have wanted.

The man who brought us Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek and Professor Charles Xavier in X-Men told the BBC that both sci-fi characters “would have voted Remain”. Stewart later spoke at a London rally, telling supporters of a vote on the deal:

“It is not Charles Xavier standing here in front of you — although I can assure you that if he was, he would have voted Remain. And why? Because unity, common cause, wellbeing of society and debate were paramount to belief of this fictional character.”

The 77-year-old is best known for his classical and Hollywood acting, adorable friendship with Ian McKellen and questionable taste in YouTube videos.

A vote to reject the deal eventually thrashed out in Brussels wouldn’t necessarily have any legal effect. A referendum in the same form as last time would not be any more legally binding than the original.

As the High Court put it in the Gina Miller case: “A referendum on any topic can only be advisory for the lawmakers in Parliament unless very clear language to the contrary in the referendum legislation in question.”

The latest comments from across Legal Cheek

But it could achieve one of two things. It could give MPs a political excuse to vote the deal down and send the government back to the negotiating table.

A new report today by boffins at the influential Institute for Government think tank says that this could work: “If Parliament voted the Government’s deal down without amendment, this could lead to a renegotiation if the Government faced insurmountable political pressure to heed Parliament’s concerns, and the 27 member states of the EU (EU27) were willing to discuss the issues raised by parliamentarians”. It rejects the conventional wisdom that it’s ‘deal or no deal’ — either take what the EU offers, or crash out with no safety net. The Law Society has said that would be “devastating” for the UK legal sector.

Or the government could try to pack the whole thing in. Stewart said yesterday that if his referendum idea worked, “we would simply stay in the [European] Union”.

Most lawyers agree that if all the other EU countries agreed, we could stay (although the chat over the Ferrero Rocher would be pretty awks for a while).

But there’s been a fierce legal debate about whether Britain can change its mind unilaterally, by just taking back its Article 50 notification of withdrawal. Most British lawyers think that it can, while others disagree.

A case trying to get the European Court of Justice to give a definitive ruling on the issue is currently before the Scottish courts. The judges aren’t that impressed by it so far, though.

Ultimately there’s no magic legal bullet that will stop Brexit. There would need to be a big change in public opinion if the UK were to reverse course. At the moment, that still looks light years away.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter





We are leaving



My god this place is running out of legal material to post lately isn’t it?

Dying on it’s arse would be a kind description of this website at the moment.



Not Amused

One of the nice things about Britain is that we actively expect our politicians to do as they are told. We expect votes to be honoured and manifesto pledges to be kept. We’re not perfect by any means. But it is nice to live in a country which believes in these things.

They are welcome to campaign to re-join the EU. Article 49 is right there in the Treaty and that is their democratic right. I look forward to hearing the arguments and to someone finally making a positive case for EU membership (if one can be made).

But it is time to stop this sort of thing.



Of course he’d be a Remoaner, Earth in Star Trek is governed by one world government after all and the federalist desire of many within the EU would be a preliminary step to this


Very amused

Captain Picard is going senile.

We already had a vote and the majority voted to leave. The terms were entirely clear (see the Government pamphlet – leaving single market etc etc).

If we have another referendum, do we have to keep on having them every year as whoever loses will just say we need another one? Or is it best of three?


Just Anonymous

“Wow, Picard thinks we should remain. I had concerns about the EU, and I did think we should probably leave. However, if a fictional character in an imaginary universe thinks otherwise, then that totally changes my mind.”

Said no-one ever.



Picard was French. What do you expect.



This ‘Luvvies for EU’ campaign will no doubt flip those working class Leave areas to supporting Remain.


Comments are closed.

Related Stories