News

High Court quadruples suspension of City lawyer convicted of Christmas party sex assault

By on
16

Alastair Main reportedly poured beer over his victim’s head and called her an ‘Australian slut’

High Court

A City lawyer who last year was convicted of sexual and racially-aggravated assault has had his professional suspension increased by the High Court.

Alastair Main, a former in-house lawyer at global investment outfit Schroders, was suspended for two years and ordered to pay approximately £2,080 in costs by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT). The suspension, however, was effectively less than a year as it was backdated to when Main lost his job following his conviction in January 2017.

At trial, Wimbledon Magistrates Court heard how the University of Nottingham grad had poured beer over a 27-year-old woman at the London Rowing Club’s 2015 Christmas party in Putney. Main, who trained at international law firm Ashurst, was also said to have slapped her bottom and called her an “Australian slut”.

Main was found guilty of sexual assault and racially-aggravated assault and was handed a 12-month community order, 200 hours of unpaid work, and placed on the sex offenders register for five years.

The 2019 Firms Most List

The High Court has now quadrupled Main’s professional suspension following an appeal by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). His suspension was due to be lifted on 4 January 2019, but has now been extended to 23 January 2022.

According to Legal Futures, the High Court found that the tribunal had referred only to Main’s risk of reoffending, as opposed to focusing on a period of suspension necessary to protect the reputation of the profession and public confidence. The legal news website went on to quote a report of the ruling produced by Lawtel. It said:

“The flaw in the tribunal’s reasoning was exposed by the SRA’s submission that if the date of the criminal trial had been postponed by two years, the suspension would have lapsed by the time it was imposed had the tribunal applied the same logic.”

It continued: “The criminal orders would expire in January 2022 and a one-year suspension in light of that was inappropriate. Protection of the public and the profession’s reputation required a four-year suspension.”

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub

16 Comments

Anonymous

2000 in costs? Not any more? The compensation should be large.

(0)(1)

Anonymous

Seems a bit OTT.

(9)(7)

Anonymous

Seems like the comments section doesn’t think sexual assault is a big deal.

(21)(7)

JD Partner

What is this “sexual assault” that you speak of?

(2)(2)

Anonymous

The one for which he was convicted?

(3)(2)

Anonymous

Sweat near me and I’ll try to make a tort, but it isn’t a crime.

(0)(2)

TT

Getting put on the sex offenders list for a smack on the bottom (probably a sleight if hand) is over the top.

(3)(5)

Anonymous

How about a slap in the cock? Not really sexual assault is it? Would be quite willing to take a months suspension for that one, when do you want it? 😉

(0)(0)

Anonymous

Not exactly the same. That is a sexual organ. Also (slightly) less cushioned. I’m into that sort of thing though, so any time darling.

(0)(0)

Anonymous

Not sure about this. Sex offenders register for 5 years was silly though.

(4)(4)

Harvey

Was the beer pouring that did it…

(1)(0)

Anonymous

Why, did he try to lick it off?

(1)(0)

Harvey

Good idea… I’ll meet you in the Chancery section of Middle Temple Library, 6 pm tonight…

(0)(0)

Anonymous

What! You mean it wasn’t you last night?

(1)(0)

Harvey

No… I was in Australia

… “Down under”

(0)(1)

ST

His defence seems to have been “I may have called her a slut, but not an Australian slut.”

(0)(0)

Comments are closed.

Related Stories