City law firms to offer training contract interviews to super-exam pilot candidates

By on

Other perks up for grabs include open day invites, one-to-one coaching sessions and £500 in cash

SQE super exam students solicitors

In recognition of their endeavours (and bravery), aspiring lawyers who perform well in the upcoming super-exam pilot could be offered a training contract interview at a City law firm. The opportunity is just one of a number attractive “career development” prizes being offered by firms in what will be the assessments first outing.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has gathered together a group of willing guinea pigs to sit stage one of the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), ahead of an anticipated launch of September 2021. The pilot, which focuses on candidates’ knowledge of black letter law and will take place in March, is being overseen by Kaplan, the legal education giant that won the contract to develop and run the exam for eight years.

It has now emerged that those who successfully secured a place on the pilot (the SRA said it received “a large number of applications”) could be offered, among other things, a place on a training contract assessment day at a City law firm. Other career opportunities available to “the best performing candidates” include open day places, skills workshops, and one-to-one coaching sessions.

The 2019 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

While it remains unclear which firms will offer what, the SRA has published a list of outfits which are taking part. This includes Mayer Brown, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP), Sidley Austin, Browne Jacobson, Atherton Godfrey, Brethertons and Moore Blatch.

Post-pilot, high performing candidates will be allowed to select the opportunity they wish to take up based on their overall result and availability (i.e. the highest scoring candidate will have first choice), according to the SRA’s website.

There are cash incentives, too. Candidates who complete the pilot will receive £300, while those who score in the top 10% will receive an additional £200.

An SRA spokesperson told Legal Cheek:

“For the pilot results to be as helpful as possible, we need candidates who are as representative as possible of the range of people who will take the actual SQE 1. We’ve had an excellent range of applications. The extra incentives, including the opportunity for career development within a firm, should further encourage all those taking part to give it their best shot. After the March pilot is complete, we will share the specific details of the opportunities at each firm with the best performing candidates.”

But it’s not all good news. The SRA stressed that candidates who successfully complete the pilot will not be exempt from the SQE once it comes into force.

The SRA’s director of education and training, Julie Brannan, will be speaking at Legal Cheek’s Future of Legal Education and Training Conference which takes place on Wednesday 22 May 2019 at Kings Place London. Tickets (first release) are available to purchase at the rate of £240 + VAT.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub



The legal profession is becoming more and more of a joke.



So is your mum.



At least I have a mother, unlike you who was clearly abandoned as a child.






How generous, an actual interview for an actual training contract? Suddenly, the thousands of pounds of debt they’ve all inevitably racked up seems worth it.



So the best performing candidates

On a legal exam

Get interviews with top firms

This isn’t a perk, it’s recruitment?



Anything is a ‘perk’ to LC.



This is absolute Bull to even be a part of the pilot scheme the participants would already need to have completed the LPC



Further to your point, this would mean that if they do well, it would suggest that the result would be due to their current grounding from the LPC.

At the very least, it would not provide qualitative support to any pilot scheme for the course that it works.

TOP education behemoth Kaplan, who bombed out of the UK previously, back at it again


Great Uncle Bulgaria

I think I’d be a shoe-in for Womble Bond Dickinson

What do you think?



I think more Womble-Bondage Dick-in-son LLP (Amsterdam)


Hanridjik Van Der Beek

Very racist.



I’m fed up with all the comments filled with a grotesque sense of self-entitlement by today’s ‘yoof’. I was from council estate, dyslexic and Aspergers with discalculia. I had to fight literally tooth and nail to get into uni as mature student at 30 with no qualifications and crappy eratic work history. Did the law degree, did a masters then set-up a paralegal office doing contract docs and business stuff. Now 22 years later I have a nice big office (but modest), 3 staff and clients in 34 countries, specialising in brands, media & tech law, IP law & Business Law. I did it ALL myself without any carrot being dangled by these idiot big city firms offering scrapings to future minions. My advice is forget the traditional routes (theyll soon merge all lawyers into 1 anyway), and take the ILEX route. I charge out at £250 an hour based from a small seaside town. You could do that too. The pubplic couldnt care less if you are whatever firm status nowadays. As long as the work is the same, its all about price point and VFM.
And Legal Cheek – shame on you for charging £240+ for tickets to what essentially, is just a jobs fair.


Comments are closed.

Related Stories