Weekly round-up of the top legal blogosphere posts
Juries are locked in deliberation rooms and told to never reveal what happens – so how can we trust their decisions? [iNews]
Fiona Onasanya: what is it like to represent yourself in the Court of Appeal? [Barrister Blogger]
A collapsed case shows the perils of policing ‘transphobia’ [The Spectator] (registration required)
24 days to Brexit — a brief roundup [Obiterj]
Blades — no glory [Minted Law]
We still can’t get over this correction to the New York Times’s Chris Grayling piece [New Statesman]
Remorse: A sorry story [BBC Radio 4]
Apple’s trade mark opposition goes pear shaped… [The IPKat]
Judges could help ‘defeat a tyrannical regime’ [The JC]
Comment: Too much jam today for partners yet the future of law will need long-term investment [Legal Business]
Joshua Rozenberg: president’s precedent favours transparency [Law Society Gazette]
Best advice at this Biglaw firm is not to ever have sex [Above The Law]
“These initiatives are of little help when the culture looks down on juniors using them. How much can an NQ do when a partner pressures them on staying? And on the broader culture side, you arguably can’t leave your team hanging when things are busy (ie most of the time)” [Legal Cheek comments]
Diverse range of practitioners sought to serve as clerks and panel members at disciplinary tribunals [Legal Cheek Hub]
