News

Exclusive: Top divorce lawyer Ayesha Vardag told female staff to ditch the cardigans in incredible 1,000-word dress code email

By on
58

Leaked to Legal Cheek

Ayesha Vardag — Credit: Vardags

One of the country’s top divorce lawyers told female staff to ditch the cardigans and that they could be “discreetly sexy” (according to their preference), in an incredible 1,000-word dress code email leaked to Legal Cheek.

It has emerged that Ayesha Vardag, who runs plush bijou law firm Vardags in London’s Old Bailey, dished out personal fashion and lifestyle pointers in an email titled, ‘Attire and image — dress code and beyond’, to staff in July 2019.

“We need to be looking fabulous at all times, including during the summer heat,” the ‘diva of divorce’ writes in the email, before going on to tell new starters and remind old staff of “a few elements to the Vardags brand”.

Women are advised to dress “formal” but are also told they can be “discreetly sexy and colourful and flamboyant at the same time according to your preference”. They should aim for “a Chanel/Dior/Armani look” and “nothing homespun or homely or what you’d cosy up by the fire in”.

Trouser suits are “just fine” but “cardigans are almost never ok”. In fact, Vardag claims in the email she “once sent a trainee in a cardigan out of a client meeting until she could borrow or find a jacket to wear”.

Also considered by Vardag to be a fashion faux pas in the office are “jersey and stretchies” which are “to be treated with extreme caution”. She adds: “Some can be classic and formal but often they look a bit teenaged or low-rent. Baggy, billowy, shapeless things are not good.”

Vardag offers further tips on female accessories. These include stockings and tights which should be sheer, black, dark grey or natural; scarves which should be “silk and classic, not raggedy and sloppy or the sort of thing you might stuff in your backpack on your gap year”; and “elegant” shoes. “I don’t say high-heeled, as I feel high heels have been disenfranchising and disabling women for decades,” she adds.

There’s advice on hair, too, which “should always be squeaky-clean and should at least appear natural”, as well as guidance on nails. “If nails are polished they must not be chipped and must be in (you guessed it) classic colours, not green, blue, black, etc. Clear lacquer or just oiling and filing may be safest in your busy and active lives but if you want to take on the scarlet commitment, hey.”

“Be elegant, sophisticated, classic but with glamour and style,” the email continues. “Never be tacky or tarty and at the same time never be drab. It’s a delicate balance which most of you know instinctively. The naked look, with lots of flesh, is not ok.”

The latest comments from across Legal Cheek

Vardag lays out rules for men, too. “It’s a Savile Row look we’re espousing”, writes Vardag, who goes on to encourage male staff to dress “classic, tailored [and] formal”. Cravats and formal waistcoats she doesn’t mind, but woolly jumpers or singlets, tweed or top-stitched trousers are a no-no. So are “super-tight trousers or pointy toes” which are “sternly frowned upon”.

Further, men are advised to wear “classic” shoes that are “black” because, as the old adage goes, “never wear brown in town”.

Vardag concludes with advice on health and fitness. “Eat well, move a lot, watch what you drink, get outside as much as you can, and glow,” she writes.

When approached by Legal Cheek for comment, Vardags director of strategy, Stephen Bence, said:

“As a top City law firm, we hold ourselves to the highest possible professional standards, extending to our dress code — to which every employee consents upon joining the business. While most of our staff have a full understanding of the standards we hold ourselves to, the occasional reminder is needed.”

Read the leaked email in full

For a weekly round-up of news, plus jobs and latest event info

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

58 Comments

Anonymous

How come the headline only focuses on females being advised what to wear when males were asked too?

(4)(1)

Decking LOl

I think that Miss Vardag should take her own advice before commanding her staff to look sexy.

(9)(1)

Kropotkin

If she were a Dickens character this woman would be called Mrs Terrorcunt and would have an army of dwarves and children in a basement hovel under the Bailey spinning her scarves made from the bile of endangered animals.

(15)(0)

Bridget Schadenfreude

Very strange!! What prompted this to come out now?? I hope this story has legs to run and run. Saville Row covered legs of course hehe!!

Pulls up my Bridget Jones knickers and big glass of Pinot Grigio while settling down in my battered old cardigan to watch this thread with interest ??

(10)(0)

wtf

The dress code is formal, not sexy. I’m a lawyer, not a sex worker.

(6)(0)

Dedicated Follower

If Madame JoJos coat check was the target look she nailed it.

(7)(0)

Kirkland NQ

We dress better over here, thank you very much! Best Dressed Firm Award 2020

(2)(0)

Teilischa Obrein

Load o Crap

(1)(0)

A Knowall

Perhaps Legal Cheek or one of the tabloids should stalk this lady’s office and take pictures of staff for publication. Then, plebs who buy their clothing from Tesco’s can then have a visual lesson of knowing how lawyers should dress.

(1)(2)

Paul Dant

Plebs would write “Tesco’s”. It is just “Tesco”.

(5)(0)

Paul Dant

A firm whose “business model” was simply to take after the event credit for the industry wide effects of White v White and global capital appreciation.

(0)(1)

Martin Routh

I’d call that a canny business model. Sounds like you don’t approve though. What would you call it?

(1)(0)

Billy Bunter

This is disgraceful prejudice, some of my best shoes are brown!

(3)(0)

Tom

“she once sent a trainee in a cardigan out of a client meeting until she could borrow or find a jacket to wear”

Poor trainee. How humiliating.

The irony is that Ayesha Vardag herself looks not the least bit classy.

(7)(0)

Anonymous

Am I the only one who completely gets the look she’s talking about and thinks that she has a right to ask that her employees aren’t dressed like plebs?

(4)(7)

A

She is going for the “7 year old let loose with Mum’s make up” look. She has perfected it.

(3)(0)

Anonymous

The wall remains undefeated.

(1)(0)

S&A

Did she say that hair should appear natural? Ermmm going by her own pic there someone needs to read that email back to her.

(4)(0)

mortlake24

Stephen Bence is perhaps the biggest tool ever to appear on Come Dine with Me and that makes him quite the tool

(6)(0)

Karl

Not sure I’d be taking detailed notes on the fashion tips. Apparently the brand aesthetic is ‘BA long haul flight attendant’.

(5)(0)

Insider

Savage burn there Karl, top

(0)(0)

Hooray Henry

Yes, yes, but what’s the NQ pay at this “plush bijou law firm”? Is it TOP? How about TOP TOP?

(2)(0)

Ex Vardags employee

I personally appreciated that the firm encouraged me to take pride in my appearance and was more generally concerned with me bettering myself in a holistic sense, as opposed to just seeing me as a faceless workhorse.

But hey don’t mind me, I get it. It’s fun to laugh at and dehumanise people.

(0)(10)

A survivor

Hahahaha. As an actual ex vardags employee I know that ayesha is just making you do damage control here but please believe in yourself enough to leave this absolute cesspit of a firm. No one likes a bootlicker

(2)(0)

Anon

Someone should report her to the SRA.

(2)(0)

Anonymous

Is bad make up a disciplinary matter now?

(0)(0)

Comments are closed.

Related Stories