Advice

‘I got a 2:2 in my contract law module. Will this hinder my chances of securing a City training contract?’

By on
51

🤔

In the latest instalment in our Career Conundrums series, one aspiring lawyer is concerned that a poor result in her contract law module has scuppered her chances of securing a training contact.

“Just wanted some advice. I finished my first year law at Queen Mary earlier this summer. Just as a question. In QM, our contract law is broken up into contract law one and contract law two, in that way, it is two 15 credit modules. For my contract law one, I only managed to obtain a 55, that is a poor 2:2. Do you believe this will severely hinder my applications for vacation schemes and training contracts later on? I heard that contract can be a veto of sorts in some City firms. Overall, I have performed to a high 2:1 to 1st standard. What do you think? Thank you for your time!”

If you have a career conundrum, email us with it to careers@legalcheek.com.

51 Comments

Anonymous

Yes.

(18)(33)

Walton

You’ll be fine. Focus on securing a good 2:1 overall. Just be prepared to explain it during interviews.

(26)(2)

Anon

I got a 2:2 in contract law (59) in my first year and I’m at a city firm. I got a 2:1 and came out with 2 training contract offers.
You will be fine !

(37)(3)

topkek

Yeah I know right, nothing like a delicious little fake anecdote to keep the spirits up.

(11)(52)

Sage

To say you can get in with a 2:2 does not mean it isn’t made more difficult by having a 2:2.

(0)(0)

Associate at City Firm

Yes, some firms will reject you outright. It only makes sense, they receive thousands of applications and this is an easy way to filter people out.

I got a 2.2 in my first year contract law module (the rest of my modules were all 2.1s), made 12 applications, got 3 interviews, one vacation scheme and one TC offer at an excellent city firm which I qualified at. It’s doable, your application just has to work harder and you need to be able to explain it.

(35)(3)

Anon Litigator

I got a 2:2 in Tort and now I am a litigation solicitor in a top 20 firm so literally don’t worry about it. If you get a first overall too, that will help!

(8)(2)

.

Ultimately, it will depend on: i) how strong your other grades/rest of application are; and ii) the type of firm you’re applying to, e.g. magic circle, silver circle, regional. I know people with high 2:1s or firsts who are struggling to get a TC, it’s a tough market. You may have to re-apply when you have the contract law 2 grade but no harm in trying for vacation schemes.

“Do you believe this will severely hinder me I applications for vacation schemes and training contracts later on? ” – something that will hinder your chances of a successful application is attention to detail, so make sure you proof read.

(25)(2)

Alex

“something that will hinder your chances of a successful application is attention to detail”

Lack of attention to detail, surely?

(10)(2)

Anonymous

No. Get the 2:1 overall and you should be fine. I carry a 2:2 in contract law module, I was able to secure a TC in the last cycle.

(21)(1)

W

Jeeez does this happen? Firms are ruthless

(6)(1)

MCT

Well, if you have 3.5K applicants for 90 places across 3 vac schemes (the rough figures for each MC firm), you’ve got to slim down those numbers a lot before even reading through applications.

(6)(0)

Anon

I got a 3rd in contract (ikr lol) in first year and have a TC at a City firm. Admittedly, I have a strong overall 2.1 from a top uni and my firm is one of the more ‘enlightened’ in the City.

(23)(1)

Bob

Any clues as to which firm?? Asking for a friend

(2)(0)

Sam

Macfarlanes right?

(0)(0)

Barry Bigglesworthe

I got a 53 in one of my second year modules. At my TC interview I told the interviewers ‘it was three years ago’, they nodded and asked the next question, and now I’m on more wedge than I could have ever dreamed of!

(13)(3)

JB

I hate these clickbait articles and the subsequent comments. Unfortunately both help to perpetuate generalised myths about recruitment in law firms which doesn’t help anyone.

From someone who screens/screened applications for multiple city firms here’s my view:

1) City law firm is a broad church – different types of city firms will could have different attitudes towards this. But even then different law firms within those categories will have different attitudes towards this. One MC firm used to have a strict policy of needing a 62 or above in contract, another MC firm would look at your academics much more holistically. Banding together 50+ city firms into one category and assuming they would all act in the same way is a mistake.

2) It depends on the rest of your profile/application. First of all, against your other academics. From what is mentioned, it will depend on what your other contract module grade is. It will then depend on what the rest of your module grades for that year are (a 69% average with a 2.2 in contract will look very different to a 60% average with a 2.2 in contract). Your module grades could then be assessed against your A-levels. And then there is all the other application sections that are undoubtedly more important than academics – most candidates will strike out on many other things than their academics, whether it is a typo, never having a job, poor career motivation etc. For most firms/individual candidates, it is unlikely that a 55% contract module will be the sole reason for not getting through to the next stage. Consider it more like a first strike.

3) Assuming you took this assessment during lockdown, firms *may* be more open minded to grades this year. The grading system for 2020 went completely out the window and there is very little belief that Spring/Summer 2020 grades are a true reflection of people’s abilities in many cases – and by this I mean both good and bad grades. Due to different universities using a combination of grade inflation, compensation systems, non-detriment policies and students not sitting all modules/assessments, the 2020 results are generally being taken with a pinch of salt.

(43)(2)

J Smith

I knew a person who never attended any lectures and barely attended classes who got a 2.2 and is freelancing for city firms who outsource. Don’t worry about it. With the SQE you don’t even need a TC.

(5)(21)

Joe

This is the worst advice ever

(52)(0)

Otiosum Redding

I never attended lectures and had no classes to go to. I did just fine.

(2)(0)

Tiktokker

Third division result in a key subject for a third division degree. This does not bold well, my friend.

(7)(14)

Lawy McLawface

Bold hahaha, get out

(7)(0)

Why bother with a TC?

You don’t need to get a training contract to do legal work.

The Free Representation Unit (FRU) has staff and volunteers with 2:2 degrees that undertake advocacy in tribunal for clients.

Your local Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) will also allow you to give advice to clients on a very wide range of areas with a 2:2 degree.

Both these places offer great careers. You don’t need a TC.

(7)(24)

Anonymous

FRU or a Citizen’s Advice Bureau for a career????

Can’t think of anything worse.

(7)(0)

Sage

You can be a granny and give CAB advice. You don’t need a 2:2.

(3)(0)

Barry Bonanza

Why do you want to be a City lawyer if you’re not clever enough to avoid a 2(ii) in a Contract law module?

(29)(32)

For the wise

You should perhaps reconsider where your real interests lay if you only obtained a 2:2 in contract law which is the key module that provides the basic framework for the type of transactions you will encounter at City firms. You could however explain it away by saying you’re more interested in litigation/advisory type work – although you may not have any modules/evidence to back this up! The key message here is…. don’t just get sucked into the hype of Magic and Silver Circle firms because they’re constantly shoved in your face as a law student – it may not be for you!

(5)(17)

Alex

And pray what is commercial litigation about!?

(10)(0)

3PQE

I was going to say – good knowledge of academic contract law is more important to litigators than transactional lawyers to be honest.

(1)(0)

SC

You’ll be fine overall – some firms might put this in the “against” column but very few factors in isolation mean a straight no. Basically be prepared to explain it but if the rest of your application is good you shouldn’t worry too much.

(4)(0)

Anon

Firms receive hundreds / thousands of applications. There is no way the majority of application reviewers will go through grades with a fine-tooth comb. They will look at headline details such as previous experience, overall grade (must be a 2:1) and, of course, responses to questions. The 2:2 in the particular module may be raised at the interview stage. That all said, some may view things differently but I think the foregoing will apply to the majority.

(4)(1)

Anon

One bad module against plenty of good modules won’t kill your chances. Some firms will bin your application for this but most won’t.

Not to mention you did this module in 2020. Firms aren’t blind to the disruption caused by the pandemic. You’ll be fine.

(3)(0)

A non-knee mousse

Yes, you are now doomed forever. As a matter of fact, I predict you will become homeless within the next 2 years and become a crack addict selling your body for a fiver. A 2:2 in one module will do that to you.

(In all seriousness, you might get pulled up on it but I highly doubt it will be fatal).

(14)(2)

Jonathan

All I would say is: good luck explaining that to the Partners at Slaughter and May.

(11)(5)

Comments are closed.