Genocide and torture to be cut from controversial new bill aimed at limiting prosecution of overseas soldiers

By on

Ex-Army MP quits over government’s failure to include protections for troops who fought in Northern Ireland

A battle over the prosecution of British soldiers in wars abroad witnessed a dramatic episode this week when the government accepted some revisions over its proposed bill to limit such prosecutions — whilst one of its ministers resigned over it.

The Overseas Operations Bill is the government’s attempt to bring to an end what it sees as “lawfare”, the practice of bringing vexatious claims of human rights breaches against British soldiers serving abroad.

Following extensive proposed amendments put forward by Labour peers in the House of Lords last week and criticism from the military, from the legal profession and beyond, the government accepted some of those changes yesterday.

Along the way, Johnny Mercer MP, Minister for Defence People and Veterans, says he was “forced to resign” over the government’s failure to include protections for soldiers who fought in Northern Ireland, which was for him “a red line”.

Mercer, a former army officer, rose to prominence among Legal Cheek readers over his verbal attacks on Martyn Day, senior partner of Leigh Day, the firm that has brought a number of civil claims over the actions of British soldiers in operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, during heated committee hearings in the course of the government taking evidence on a possible bill.

The original bill, introduced in March 2020, proposed to protect service personnel from legal action relating to overseas operations by introducing “a presumption against prosecution” for alleged criminal offences committed more than five years previously, time limits on bringing civil claims, and a duty on the government to consider derogating from the European Convention on Human Rights in relation to overseas military operations.

The Lords’ amendments that the government has conceded on will carve out of the bill’s presumption against prosecution crimes against humanity, genocide and torture, and will remove the duty to consider derogation from the ECHR.

Speaking to Legal Cheek, Martyn Day commented:

“This bill has been a nonsense from beginning to end with so much opposition from so many different groups. It seems to completely misunderstand Britain’s international obligations; it is clearly welcome that the government is accepting at least some amendments.”

Earlier this week, the Law Society of England and Wales published the results of a public poll it had commissioned from YouGov Direct on the issue of the prosecution of the military. Of a survey of 1,500 people, 96% said the UK courts should hold people in the military either to the same (71%) or a higher standard (25%) as the average citizen.

Commenting on the bill’s intention to limit prosecution of soldiers from certain crimes, Law Society president, I. Stephanie Boyce, said: “No other serious crime, let alone crimes against humanity or torture, has a limitation period and no exception should be introduced.”

One of the solicitors who was involved in bringing a large number of claims arising out of the invasion of Iraq, Phil Shiner, through his now-defunct firm, Public Interest Lawyers, was subsequently struck off in 2017 for professional misconduct. An up-and-coming factual drama produced by the BBC starring Toby Jones as Phil Shiner is, according to the rumour mill, due to be broadcast in May.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter



That protecting murderers and torturers is now a priority of this far right Government says a lot about its totemic pandering to the base Red Wall Brexit mob.


Awwww bless you think the Tories are far right. “Red Wall Brexit mob” Were you born with such disdain for working class people from outside of London… or did you pick it up at private school?


Tarring all working class people with the Red Wall Brexit mob is a straw man argument. The Tories have targeted exactly the sort of Northern voter who though the BNP had some good ideas – poorly educated, unsuccessful and looking for someone to blame for their anger and inadequacy. The recipe is the right hint of dog whistle racism from Boris and Patel, add in anti-EU rhetoric, protect statues more than civil rights and drape the Union Jack everywhere, imbuing it with some totemic status. Oh and I am Northern and working class, thanks for asking. I know exactly the bottom feeding that the Tories are doing to maintain their beloved vote share.



Boris Johnson doesn’t care about you

Akin to living in China. The untouchable culture of the security services is constantly galvanised by the cherry-picking of the rule of law by government. This bill is so beyond fucked it would give corona-graduating students a run for their money.


Oh the Law Society commissioned a poll did they… oh wait its 1500 respondents, no doubt all from central London. I know LC is geared up toward pandering to students, but the number of lefty anti government/military/tradition/free speech/anything wholesome types who are getting their comments published, when very few if any counter comments seem to be published is telling. Unless the regular commenters who skewed center and right have just vanished into thin air all at the same time that is…


U okay hun?


Barry, that is because most of the people who share your view don’t get online much, being in the last decade of their lives.


No bantz no more

Join the conversation

Related Stories