My experience of the SQE so far

Avatar photo

By SQE Student on


A law grad and training contract offer holder details their journey through SQE1

Like most others starting on the SQE, I too had heard the horror stories — too much content, a nightmare to book the assessments and long, tiring exam days. Having recently sat both FLK1 and FLK2 for the first time, this is how I found it.

Studying for SQE1

Having already done a law degree in England, I started preparing for the SQE1 thinking that I might have it easier. But the reality was that a few years had passed since those contract and tort modules and my memory was more than a bit rusty. So, as it turned out, I had to put just as much time into studying for some of the subjects I’d already covered on my law degree, as for those I hadn’t previously encountered.

The large volume of content that the SQE1 tests on was also something to get used to in the initial weeks. Even with the support of a preparation course, I often felt like I was just constantly learning new information and felt doubtful if I was actually absorbing anything. I was used to studying law with cases mapping out the nuanced progression of a rule over time and applying that knowledge in problem questions and essays, while the SQE1 is a multiple-choice question exam. I certainly found myself over-analysing and questioning the answer choices, falling back into the habit of covering all bases as we’re taught to do in a law degree. It also didn’t help that the SQE1 answer choices are in a ‘single best answer’ format, so you’re not necessarily choosing the right answer from a selection of wrong ones — there could be more than one response that answer the question correctly, just that there’s only one which answers it the best.

It took me a few weeks to get into a good study routine, force myself to be consistent and stick to a schedule. Once I did this, I found myself feeling less overwhelmed by how much there was to get through, because it just came down to methodically following a plan. It’s important to remember that there’s going to be some subjects you get the hang of really easily, and some that you just can’t seem to get right. Because the SQE1 is a pass/fail exam, try not to get too bogged down by wanting to learn everything in all the subjects perfectly, and instead, be strategic about your strengths and weaknesses and the areas that you can realistically improve on by dedicating a few extra study hours. Analysing your scores across the different subjects in practice questions and mock exams is helpful to try and understand this — while it may take a bit of extra time, it’s definitely worth it because it means your revision can be more focused.

The 2024 Legal Cheek Law Schools Most List

Having a clear schedule and sticking to it also means that you have better boundaries when it comes to juggling work, family and social commitments, and don’t feel guilty about taking time off so you don’t end up burned out.

Revising for SQE1

When revising I really had to resist the temptation to try and perfect every little bit of information on the SQE1 syllabus. The SRA website provides an outline of the percentage of questions that will be asked from each subject area — it definitely helped me to keep this in mind when revising, so that I wasn’t spending hours and hours on a tiny section of the course that might only come up in a couple of questions on the exam.

I also tried to balance revising content with doing practice questions every day when I was revising, since I found that there was sometimes a gap between knowing the information and applying it to the MCQs. Doing mock exams is also quite helpful to figure out when you start losing focus and begin feeling tired under timed conditions, so that you can factor in some time to take a water break in the exam.

I made sure that I wasn’t doing too many practice questions in the last couple of days before the exam and focused more on any loose ends in the actual content to try and keep my mind fresh for the 5 hours of MCQs on assessment day.

Sitting the exams

After the initial struggle of booking a centre to sit FLK 1 and FLK 2, there wasn’t anything unexpected about the process of sitting either exam — just the usual things. Arriving well ahead of time, having the right ID documents to hand, wearing comfortable clothes — as for any exam.

Perhaps the most challenging aspect was trying not get demotivated when faced with a series of challenging questions and ensuring I wasn’t spending too much time on any one question — I found it helpful to use the ‘flag’ function to earmark questions I was struggling with and come back to it at the end to try and work the answer out. I certainly found my focus wavering around the halfway mark and really had to force myself to concentrate on answering the questions.

Of course, I’ve only just sat the exams, so I haven’t got my results to hand yet. But it might help those who are feeling a bit lost about preparing for and sitting the SQE1 exams to hear about a recent experience of doing the same, for what it’s worth!

‘SQE Student’ is a law grad and training contract offer holder.


City Trainee

The SQE was an absolutely horrible experience…rest assured, life does get somewhat better once you enter practice.


At least it builds resilience or whatever

SQE is awful

My SQE experience was horrific. The process of booking was an all day ordeal, my FLK2 was of such a level of difficulty that I can’t imagine any NQ passing it comfortably, and as the paper will never be released publicly there’s no external oversight of just how bad the questions were in terms of length, complexity, and detail. I was barely questioned on my application of appropriate knowledge, but instead was repeatedly asked to recall the most obscure details of the spec. The advice I received before the exam was to focus on breadth, not depth, and while I managed to do both it was still nowhere near the level of detail they expected.


The SQE1 questions are LONG and VAGUE and full of WAFFLE. The answer options are also SOOOOO VAGUE that at least three could be classed as the “best correct answer”. I don’t actually think any amount of preparation is sufficient. Maybe they should quality check the questions with actual lawyers before approving them?


Not a fan of the SRA (shady, wasteful, incompetent, and unresponsive — it’s ridiculous regulation isn’t done by the Law Society) but they do actually run the questions by a panel of solicitors beforehand. It says so in their explanation of the marking system.


The SQE is not for the faint! Definitely the hardest exam I’ve ever done. On the SQE1 FLK2 paper I just got the Park (52). I hate to say it but SQE2 is even harder! I’m in the middle of them and I learnt all the forms for criminal, property, probate, business and disputes for it to not even be tested in the exam. It’ll all be worth it in the end, at least that’s what I’m telling myself!


I’ve just done sqe1. It was awful. The amount of content was just so much and for this one we started in September for the exams in january. So 10 to 12 hour days every day including weekends just to get through the material. It was full on. Then the exams were just something else. Flk 1 was OK ish, but flk 2 was poles apart in terms of difficulty and specificity of the questions. How they moderated them is anyones guess but everyone said flk 2 was significantly harder. Lets put it this way, I’m not waiting for the results to start revising for the resit.

SQE is grim

Words cannot describe how horrific the SQE1 exams were. The difficulty of it, coupled with the fact that my firm has not offered any form of resit safety net, has resulted in a level of anxiety I’ve honestly never felt before. I say that as someone with a law degree from a good uni. The SRA should be ashamed of this terrible botched assessment that just needs to be binned.

SQE Enemy

Having sat the SQE1 papers this year (sponsored at one of the major providers) after a few years of paralegalling at US firms, I can only chime in to say that it is the hardest exam I have ever sat – attempting to pass was trickier than getting a first at a top 5 UK uni at masters level, and has absolutely no resemblance at all to practice. To make matters worse, most of us are now prepping for a tight turnaround on SQE2 without even knowing if we passed SQE1 for another month and a half.

SQEs have been so badly implemented

Have just taken FLK1 and 2 – I am honestly appalled by how the SRA and Kaplan have behaved regarding their poorly-managed and implemented exams. They’ve tried to create a centralised assessment similar to the ‘Bar’, but have been completely indifferent regarding doing any work whatsoever to provide information regarding the possible content and style of questions featured in these SQE1 exams. They’ve created utterly misleading sample questions nothing like those featured in the assessments, failed to provide course providers such as ULaw, BPP and Barbri, QLTS with example questions (resulting in widely differing ‘SBAQ’ mocks and questions, dismissed and ignored a vast number of complaints and suggestions, and in the exams themselves have failed to create assessments that cover the material properly, instead preferring to narrow down on certain subjects almost exclusively (often unlikely to be even covered in prep courses). A centralised assessment may have been a good thing if the regulator in question wasn’t so clearly incompetent.

Join the conversation

Related Stories