SRA issues warning over fake law firm with its very own ‘Mike Ross’

Avatar photo

By Angus Simpson on

5

Scammers fans of Suits?

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued a warning over a website falsely claiming to be a law firm — featuring one “Mike Ross”.

The website for the supposed law firm “LegalLens Law Firm”, was flagged as a scam by the regulator. Thirteen “individuals who are not authorised or regulated by the SRA” are listed with profile pictures and bios.

But one name in particular caught Legal Cheek’s eye.

“Legal Lens” claims to have a lawyer on their books called Mike Ross who purportedly moved from corporate law to specialise in family and private client. Since 1991, the website says, Ross’s 30 years’ hard graft has helped him make partner — even heading the fictitious family team.

Mike Ross is (also) a protagonist in the drama Suits, famous for being a whip smart lawyer — whilst keeping quiet about not actually holding a law degree.

The SRA said the website falsely displays a supposed SRA ‘digital badge’, plus email addresses, and a North America phone number. The regulator confirmed it does “not authorise or regulate a firm of solicitors called ‘LegalLens Law Firm’” — so it seems this “Mike Ross” probably isn’t fit to practise either.

Alongside scam dangers, the regulator issued this warning in part to alert lawyers and laypeople to mistaken identity. For more details, check the alert.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

5 Comments

Ollar

If he’s half as smart as the real Mike Ross, then there’s hardly an issue

Susan

Sra only investegate the lawyers they want to, they say they have a code of practice but when I reported a solicitor who would not get a medical report that was wrong put right they said the solicitor was of good character and did nothing, I have had to go to the osbudsman who I am still waiting to look into it, so being registered with sra means nothing

Pete

For the SRA not to take any action because the Solicitor is off good character is totally wrong and irrelevant. Surely, her actions in not correcting a medical report is against what she has been instructed to do by client. I hope you get the answers you need from Ombudsman in due course.

Archibald O'Pomposity

Why on earth would the SRA want to get involved in such a trivial dispute? It’s only your biased opinion that states the medical report contained inaccurate data. The solicitor, who is bound by a duty to act honestly and in good faith, presumably believed otherwise. Case closed.

Abdabs

Usually people only post half the story. The medical report was probably unfavourable and you didn’t like it and wanted someone who’d agree with you. Otherwise you’d be making a negligence claim against the solicitor instead of going to the LEO.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Fraudsters impersonate magic circle law firm on WhatsApp

Fake Linklaters texts concern a 'foreign business transaction'

May 11 2021 11:06am
Harvey Specter

Harvey Specter’s apology to law students

Actor behind student fav worries show misrepresents law

Feb 5 2025 8:48am
4