Aspiring lawyer wins right to sue Clyde & Co over alleged discrimination after TC rejections

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

19

Law grad claims she was unfairly denied remote assessment


An aspiring lawyer has been given the go-ahead to pursue legal action against Clyde & Co over alleged discrimination after being rejected for a training contract, though parts of her claim have been struck out by a judge.

The City law firm initially tried to block Anne Epelle’s claim, arguing that she had waited too long to bring it.

However, employment Judge Oliver Segal found that the aspiring lawyer — who is representing herself — had acted on information that only came to light at a later stage, making the case “not entirely straightforward”.

According to Law360 (£), Epelle studied for a UK law degree while living in Nigeria and applied for training contracts at the firm’s offices in Bristol and Hamburg, Germany.

Epelle — who studied engineering at Leeds University before going on to complete a conversion course and LPC at The University of Law — says that after being rejected by the firm, she later discovered she “had passed the initial sifting process” and should have been offered a remote assessment — but wasn’t.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

Epelle alleges that Clyde & Co discriminated against her by requiring her to take an in-person assessment, which she says was impractical given that she was around 3,000 miles away in Nigeria. She says she is suing “because this firm advertised on its website that conducts virtual assessment centres” and accused the law firm of discriminating against her based on her race, nationality and visa status.

The firm’s barrister argued at the hearing that the Bristol training contract differed from others because it required an in-person assessment, according to the report.

Although Epelle is allowed to pursue her claim, Judge Segal rejected her attempt to add senior members of Clydes — including partners — to the legal action, finding no evidence that they were involved in any of the decisions made.

Separate claims of direct discrimination and harassment against members of the firm’s recruitment team were struck out.

The judge’s decision to allow the aspiring lawyer to pursue some of her claims against the firm followed a hearing back in April, where an appeals tribunal overturned a lower tribunal’s ruling that her claims fell outside its jurisdiction.

The Legal Cheek Firms Most List shows Clydes recruits over 70 UK trainees each year on starting salary of between £24,000 and £47,000 depending on location.

The firm declined to comment.

19 Comments

Anonymous

If you really want the job… You’d have travelled to it…

(50)(116)

WorkingClassLawyer

Without employer funding? I am sorry but not all of us are millionaires with an unlimited budget. Very different travelling Manchester to London etc. and thats expensive enough but Nigeria?

Be real

It was her choice to apply? What a ridiculous comment…

Read the full article you melt

Did you miss the part where it said the firm had mentioned that it conducted virtual ACs?

Anonymous

Interesting! Let’s see how this one plays out.

Anonymous

Great idea to sue a law firm before you’ve even begun and spaff your name out there for the market to see.

(144)(10)

Kelvin

What a way to lower the mast

Paul

Any law firm that has a business mind would hire her! Well done!

City Lawyer

Epelle’s case is weak because it hinges on a firm’s right to require in-person assessments, especially for location-specific roles. She wasn’t denied based on race or nationality, but logistics. Suing before entering the profession publicly brands her as litigious – hardly strategic. This looks less like discrimination, more like entitlement.

VJ

“had passed the initial sifting process” and should have been offered a remote assessment — but wasn’t.”…. how would you even find that out?

Robin

Surely a meeting in person is a must?? I attended my interview for a part time position at Spud U Like in person and in a mis match suit. I impressed them enough, made my £££ as a student and rest was brilliant. I wasn’t in Nigeria but made sure I chose a location which was accessible for an interview 🤔🤨😃. Careful what I say as this trainee lawyer may drag me to court. 😂

Maureen

No such a thing as a UK law degree.

Gorgotron

The mainstream media forget about Scotland.

Andrew

It’s an undeniably ballsy move to sue, but firms don’t have carte blanche when dealing with potential trainees, so they’ve got every right to stand up for themselves. In any case, win or lose, this may well be a good professional advertisement for their skills.

Anonyme

Well that is one way to make sure you never get hired…

Lol what

Employer: please attend our office for an interview
Aspiring Solicitor: Ill see you in court

Anonymous

You know what? hell yeah

‘ ear ‘ear !

Hell is empty…….
All the……
Are here !

Not another one

Urgh. Stuff like this annoys me.

The firm’s process for that office was an in person assessment, and if you are applying for a placement there, surely you have to expect that you might need to travel?

I get that the applicant was abroad, but if travelling to assessment is not possible, then it up to her to find suitable alternatives. It is not on the firm to cater to every need or face getting sued.

No wonder our insurance premiums are so high with this type of action from someone who is sore for not progressing…

Join the conversation