News

‘A cosy old boys’ network’: MP grills SRA over its handling of Weinstein NDA scandal

By on
11

Regulator says there is an investigation under way into Allen & Overy, the firm that drafted the document

Philip Davies MP submitted the chief executive of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to intense questioning this morning, about what Davies saw as the lack of action taken by the regulator against magic circle law firm Allen & Overy (A&O).

The firm and its employment partner, Mark Mansell, were advisers to Miramax at the time that the company, founded by Harvey Weinstein, entered into a highly-criticised non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with Zelda Perkins, Weinstein’s former assistant in London.

Davies grilled the SRA’s Paul Philip about the fact that the SRA had on the one hand issued a warning notice to the profession about NDAs — which it had in March 2018 — and yet at the same time appeared not to have taken action against the firm for drafting Perkins’ NDA that included provisions which, so drafted, “could amount to professional misconduct,” Davies said.

Philip confirmed that the regulator does have “an open investigation” into the matter.

SRA chief executive, Paul Philip

The committee also criticised the SRA for not obtaining a copy of the NDA itself when the matter was first reported to it in November 2017. The committee heard that the SRA had met with A&O on 28 November 2017 but had not at that point in time taken any further action pending “further information coming to light”. But nor had the SRA seen a copy of the NDA itself, the committee heard.

The 2018 Firms Most List

Philip conceded that the SRA “should have asked for it [the NDA]” at the time.

Davies concluded that the whole episode “leaves a taste in the mouth that the SRA and its relationship with solicitors is like that of a cosy, old boys’ network, scratching each other’s backs and not taking anything seriously”. He asked Philip: “Are you not embarrassed about this?”

Philip denied this and defended the SRA’s record in investigating and pursuing solicitors who cross the line:

“The fact is that we receive about 12,000 complaints each year, we have taken action in relation to about 1,000 of these, and about 200-300 of those are prosecuted before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.”

Davies pressed him further: “Maybe it is a cosy organisation for big solicitor firms?”

Philip, again, defended the SRA’s record in relation to the larger firms, arguing that the regulator has taken “a number of significant pieces of action against big solicitor firms in the past three years”.

The NDA, signed by Perkins in 1998 following an allegation of sexual harassment against Weinstein, has been heavily criticised for its heavy-handedness and, potentially, “perverting the course of justice” as it attempted to bar Perkins from reporting her allegations to the police and even putting restrictions on her ability to discuss her situation with a medical practitioner.

The Women and Equalities Committee set up an inquiry into sexual harassment in the workplace in light of the Weinstein scandal, looking into how widespread sexual harassment is, and what the government and employers should be doing to improve the situation.

During the inquiry, the committee has focused particular attention on the use of NDAs by employers in relation to ex-employees, and the role of lawyers in drafting them.

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Newsletter

11 Comments

Anonymous

A cost old boys network. As a practicing barrister of 14 years, sounds spot on to me. The profession stinks to high heaven.

(13)(3)

Anonymous

“Cosy”

(2)(0)

Anonymous

practising

(2)(0)

TRUTH SIREN

Barristers are such a set of gimps

(0)(1)

Negative Equity

All Old Etonians no doubt.

(5)(2)

Anonymous

It may have been an urgent meeting at the Grand Lodge to see which 3rd degree free masons could be dropped into position to take orders from the fourth degree. That could explain the omission of the request for the nda.

That aside, what action have the sra taken against large firms, as claimed ?

There is a perception of leniency there in the comments section of lc.

(2)(2)

Papa Shango’s Pronunciation Guide

It’s not:

Ween-Steen
Wine-Stine
Ween-Stine
or
Wine-Steen.

Rather, it’s

Wank-Stain

(2)(2)

Corbyn. Sympathiser

That’ll be my new name for my pal Trumpenkreig. Thanks.

(0)(1)

A trust fund with a trust fund

This post has been removed because it breached Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(1)(0)

Oppidan

Not one of ours

(2)(0)

Anonymous

This post has been removed because it breached Legal Cheek’s comments policy.

(1)(0)

Comments are closed.

Related Stories