News

All firms should publish gender pay gap data, says Law Society

By on
15

Current rules only require outfits with at least 250 employees to report figures

The Law Society of England and Wales is encouraging all law firms regardless of size to publish their gender pay gap data.

The current regulations only require firms with at least 250 employees to disclose their pay gap stats, however, Chancery Lane bigwigs are now urging outfits with fewer than 250 employees to “report voluntarily where it is practicable to do so.” Firms who heed the Law Society’s advice will appear on the government pay gap portal with a digital badge indicating that their report was voluntary.

Elsewhere in today’s new guidance, the Law Society asks firms to consider collecting additional information about their disability, ethnicity and sexuality pay gaps as this will offer firms a more “comprehensive picture of the overall state of equality and inclusion in the organisation”.

The guidance makes a number of other recommendations that go beyond the legal requirements. These include reporting partner remuneration, creating a robust narrative report and a detailed action plan.

The 2019 Firms Most List

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said:

“Law firms can get ahead of the curve by assessing and tackling the range of pay gaps that may exist in their organisation. Inequalities can be compounded by the intersection of protected characteristics like gender and ethnicity, so identifying these dynamics will help firms to create far more effective and sustainable equality action plans. We have worked with the profession to develop a common set of standards that provide the level of transparency expected by firms’ clients, people and the public.”

The fresh guidance comes just days after Macfarlanes revealed its pay gap data for 2018. The single-office City player reported a partner inclusive mean and median result of 75% and 49%, respectively. This followed hot on the heels of Allen & Overy‘s results, again including partners, of 61.2% (mean) and 39% (median).

Earlier this summer, the magic circle player faced heavy criticism from MPs after refusing to recalculate its 2017 results including partners. At the time, Rachel Reeves, chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (BEIS), accused A&O of “dragging its feet” over partner pay figures.

For all the latest commercial awareness info, and advance notification of Legal Cheek's careers events:

Sign up to the Legal Cheek Hub

15 Comments

Anonymous

Gender pay gap?

Anonymous

We all waiting with baited breath for the pay gap figures for those high street firms in Walsall.

Anonymous

We need to address bullying and intimidation in city law firms, eg Nick Levy in Cleary.

We need to look closely on the long hours culture of city law in order to address diversity and gender pay gap issues.

We need to change city law

#metoo

Anonymous

We need to stop putting random sentences in a list.

We need to stop drawing false parallels.

We need to stop looking for problems that don’t exist.

Anonymous

Publish hours billed by each gender also

Triggered Loon

ABSOLUTELY NOT! THAT WILL DESTROY THE NARRATIVE!

Man Booker 2019.

Fine, apart from solicitation, law firms will also publish fiction.

Anonymous

Most of the hours billed are fiction.

Anonymous

no one cares about how much Patel, Mirza and Others LLP pay their secretaries

Steven Seagull

How many of the 100+ genders will they be covering in the report?

Anonymous

Can we vote to leave the law society?

Anonymous

Not sure how much can be taken from arbitrary pay grades. In our team we have pay disparities at the same level as some roles involve lots of travel and nights away from home. The overall time spent on the job is about 10-15% more consuming than those spent chained to their desk. A simple tabular overview won’t tell you that.

Steven Seagull

Chained to their desk?

Some people would pay good money to be in that position!

Anonymous

JESUS ALEX CLOSE THE COMMENTS

Davvy Jones

Masta Turnah!

Feel free to go ashore…

…the very next time we make port!

(Laughs)

Join the conversation

Related Stories