Weekly round-up of the top legal blogosphere posts
The £1 billion IT project that has caused chaos in the criminal courts [The Spectator] (registration required)
Why do lawyers talk legalese? [Pink Tape]
Can the government veto legislation by advising the Queen to withhold royal assent? [Public Law For Everyone]
Police and crime commissioners are not up to the job [The Times] (registration required)
Why is Chris Grayling spending so much money on telephone bills? [The Spectator] (registration required)
Our courts must protect domestic abuse victims from being silenced [Liberty]
Delay is a waste of time [Spinning Hugo]
Tommy Robinson faces defamation action over Syrian refugee video [Zelo Street]
The risks of the “Grieve amendment” to remove precedence for government business [Policy Exchange]
Crispin Passmore: Change happens in two ways — gradually and then suddenly [Legal Futures]
Home Office put eight-month-old baby with British citizenship in immigration detention centre [Free Movement]
“Denning survives as a great interview filter. If a candidate waxes on about how great he was, it’s rejection for them…” [Legal Cheek comments]
How will Brexit disarray affect future lawyers? With Ashurst, Hogan Lovells, Henderson Chambers, Shearman & Sterling and ULaw [Legal Cheek Hub]
Jobs jobs jobs! [Legal Cheek Hub]
