Weekly round-up of the top legal blogosphere posts
How English Law presumes you guilty, even if your conviction is quashed [Barrister Blogger]
There’s no presumption of innocence for the wrongly imprisoned [The Spectator]
Lord Pannick QC: An amazing amount has changed over a lifetime of covering law [The Times] (registration required)
Guest post by Joanna Hardy: Court closures and the cost of losing local justice [Secret Barrister]
Being a litigator ‘what I’d tell a younger me’: The Secret Barrister’s self-defence instructor — Sarah Robson [Civil Litigation Brief]
What modules are best for you? [The Almost Lawyers]
Professor Richard Moorhead: What is really being protected in the Linklaters case? [Legal Futures]
Case Law: Burgon v News Group, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice successful in libel action against ‘Nazi symbols’ allegation [Inforrm’s Blog]
The best blogs to help students through law school [The Guardian]
Book Review: Transparency in the family courts — publicity and privacy in practice [Pink Tape]
Opinion: Alabama executions — strictly a Christian affair [Alabama Political Reporter]
Yellow vests crisis: What are flash-balls and why haven’t they been banned? [Legal Cheek Journal]
“It’s a difficult one for everyone involved. From the SRAs perspective you can’t be seen to be allowing someone to be complicit in fraud / dishonesty EVEN when there is an element of bullying / etc. involved. I have the utmost sympathy for Ms Scott but I think the wider message here is to blow the whistle before getting involved in what is a crime of dishonesty.” [Legal Cheek comments]
Jobs jobs jobs! [Legal Cheek Hub]
