SRA defends use of MCQs in SQE exams

Avatar photo

By Julia Szaniszlo on

5

Regulator says approach is fair, efficient and not just recall

Online exam
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has published a new explainer justifying its use of single best answer multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE1).

The regulator says the MCQ format “does not test simple recall” but instead assesses aspiring lawyers’ ability to apply legal knowledge in a practical way.

According to the SRA, the approach is widely used in other high-pressure professions, such as medicine and accountancy. It argues that the method allows broad coverage of topics, is cost-effective, and ensures consistency because answers are marked by computer rather than examiners. It also points out that SQE2, taken later in the qualification process, does assess more traditional skills like legal drafting, writing and advocacy.

The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

The explainer adds that the format is considered “fair”, noting that post-exam analysis shows no evidence of particular questions disadvantaging certain groups of candidates. It also points to data indicating that candidates who perform well in SQE1 usually go on to achieve strong results in SQE2

The SRA’s justification of the MCQ format comes amid criticism from students and academics, some of whom argue it reduces the exam to more of a memory test than an assessment of genuine legal reasoning. Others question whether it reflects the reality of legal practice, where problems rarely come with five pre-set options.

The most recent SQE1 pass rate, released in April, was 56% — up from the record low of 44% in the previous sitting.

5 Comments

Yikes

It’s recent failings make clear that the SRA is not fit for purpose and needs to be abolished and rebuilt from scratch. The previous system should be brought back in the interim.

Mid level associate

I really feel for those doing sqe. Run by a paper pushing inadequate regulator that over charges us all for the privilege (pun not intended). The exams are [redacted] and unfit for purpose. Woke has plagued the sra too long.

If i had to do sqe, would not bother. Feel worse for those paying from their own pockets to the churn machines known as BPP/ulaw

Anonymous

I acknowledge the fact that the SQE is supposed to be very hard, as it should be, considering it is such a valued profession. Having passed SQE1, I also see the value of the current MCQ format well, but at the moment, it seems impossible for the SRA to actually evaluate and assess some of the shortcomings of the process, and actively take into consideration the procedural problems that people have with the exams.

There’s a lack of available past papers (which is understandable if they actually reuse questions tbf), and the contrast in difficulty of the SRA sample Qs compared to the actual exam is quite stark, which forces people to spend more and more money on external mock exams, which can take quite a toll on non-sponsored students.

Let’s hope they provide individual pass rates for course providers for the latest results. Also, the vagueness of the specification causes different providers to provide different levels of detail, which could cause some students to have a severe disadvantage on exam day. Personally, I think the MCQ format has value and the content allows you to think and problem solve, but the lack of acknowledgement of any shortfalls by the SRA really annoys me.

MC Trainee

Let us be realistic. A lot of the people that failed the SQE (particularly multiple times) probably did not work hard / smart enough. It is a hard exam – perhaps the hardest I have undertaken, but it is not impossible. Statistics show that MOST people pass first time. Agreed that the SRA could be better, agreed that SQE is perhaps rather expensive, but DISAGREE that a hard exam is the issue here.

This will be an inflammatory take, unfortunately… but t’is truth

Anonymous

I dont think you can quite classify the exam as being ‘passed by most’ when its pass rate hovers around 50%. I do wonder if you have considered people who work full time in law/any sector whilst studying. It is incredibly difficult to fit the content in when working 35+ hours a week. I dont think difficulty is the issue most people have, as opposed to format as discussed in the article.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

news SQE Hub

SQE2 pass rate hits record 82%

2,753 students sat latest assessment

Aug 28 2025 8:54am
10
news SQE Hub

‘My 10 point plan for SQE reform’

Thom Brooks, professor of law and government at Durham University, puts forward his recommendations for overhauling the SQE

Jun 30 2025 7:33am
29